Download presentation
1
Stress Testing : Which Test to Choose?
Gary J. Balady, MD Professor of Medicine Boston University School of Medicine
2
Stress Testing at Boston Medical Center
Exercise ECG ( treadmill test) Exercise – Echo Exercise – Nuclear Cardiopulmonary ( Metabolic ) Dobutamine –Echo Pharmacologic (regadenoson) nuclear SPECT PET SCM Order Set: stress test selector
3
supply demand
5
supply demand coronary arteries atherosclerosis coronary vasospasm hypoxemia anemia hypotension coronary anomalies coronary vasculitis factors HR x BP contractility wall stress
6
Supply Degree of obstruction Length of lesion
Dynamic properties of lesion Dynamic properties of distal vascular bed thickness of myocardium
7
Supply Collateral flow
8
supply demand factors HR x BP contractility
9
History Chest discomfort Age/Gender/Risk Factors Classes of Angina
Types of angina Quality of discomfort/location Provocative factors Relief Age/Gender/Risk Factors Classes of Angina
10
weight/body habitus vascular bruits heart size skin eye grounds
Physical Examination hypertension weight/body habitus vascular bruits heart size skin eye grounds
11
Resting Electrocardiogram
15
Exercise Testing Protocols
16
Work = force x distance Workrate = work/time VO2 is directly related to workrate
Treadmill Force = body weight Distance/time= Treadmill speed Estimated VO2 (ml/kg/min) ACSM regression equations METs Stationary Cycle Force = resistance against the flywheel Distance/time= Cycling speed Estimated VO2 (ml/min) ACSM regression equations Need body weight to calculate METs
17
Stepped METs Ramp METs Time 10 min
18
Bruce Protocol for Treadmill Testing
STAGE TIME SPEED (mph) GRADE (%) METS REST 00.00 0.0 1.0 1 03.00 1.7 10.0 4.6 2 2.5 12.0 7.0 3 3.4 14.0 10.1 4 4.2 16.0 12.9 5 5.0 18.0 15.1 6 5.5 20.0 16.9 7 6.8 22.0 19.2
19
Boston Medical Center Ramp Protocols
Stage* Very Low Ramp Low Ramp Moderate Ramp High Ramp Athlete’s Ramp mph % grade METs 1 1.0 0.0 1.8 1.5 2.5 2.1 3.0 3.5 2.4 2 1.1 0.2 1.9 0.5 1.6 2.0 2.7 2.2 4.0 3.9 3 1.2 0.4 1.7 2.9 2.3 4.5 4.2 3.2 4 1.3 0.6 3.1 5.5 4.6 3.6 5 1.4 0.8 3.4 6.0 5.0 3.3 4.1 6 2.6 7.0 7 7.5 5.8 5.2 8 2.8 8.5 6.4 6.1 9 9.0 6.8 7.3 10 4.8 10.0 7.4 8.4 11 6.5 5.1 10.5 7.8 9.5 12 11.5 10.6 13 12.0 8.9 5.4 14 8.0 6.2 13.0 9.7 5.7 12.2 15 3.8 6.6 13.5 10.1 16 14.5 10.9 6.3 13.8 17 3.7 15.0 11.4 14.7 18 4.3 16.0 6.9 15.5 19 8.3 16.5 12.6 7.2 16.4 20 4.7 11.0 8.7 17.5 13.3 17.3
20
Duke Activity Status Index
21
Diagnostic level of stress: 85% maximum predicted HR
where MPHR = (220-age)
22
Normal Response Ischemic Response
24
Sensitivity/Specificity/Predictive Value high prevalence population
63 3 95 27 7 21 90 10 exercise ecg test: 70% sensitive/ 70% specific
25
Sensitivity/Specificity/Predictive Value low prevalence population
7 27 21 3 63 95 10 90 exercise ecg test: 70% sensitive/ 70% specific
27
Duke Prognostic Scoring System
x x * x x
28
Heart Rate Recovery 28
29
Heart Rate Recovery: Risk of mortality at 6 years
Cole, et al. NEJM 1999: 341:1351 29
30
Cleveland Clinic ETT Score
Lauer, et al. Ann Int Med 147: ; 2007
31
Hypertension During Exercise: BPs > 180 at 7 METs
The risk is not immediate, but is evident in the near term – the 5-10 year period which is a focus of most preventive strategies and pharmacotherapies, and continues to increase dramatically in the long term – i.e lifetime risk – the focus of public health groups like the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010: 121: 2109
32
Oxygen Uptake - Workrate relationship
No handrail Handrail VO2 ? Workrate
33
CPX System Oxygen sensor Carbon dioxide sensor
Volume measures/flow meters Breath by breath measures BTPS Expired air Oxygen uptake Carbon Dioxide production Ventilation
34
Indications for CPX Accurate assessment of exercise capacity Diagnosis
Clinical Research Diagnosis Dyspnea on exertion Prognosis Heart failure Congenital Heart Disease Disability assessment Treatment Pacemaker settings
35
Exercise Testing additional indications
Adequacy of therapy medical revascularization ( imaging tests) Activity counseling MET Chart Exercise prescription Rhythm assessment Valvular Heart Disease Aortic stenosis Mitral stenosis Mitral regurgitation Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
36
Exercise Prescription Patients with CHD
Intensity Exercise Test calculate heart rate reserve (HRR) peak HR minus resting HR moderate intensity: 50% HRR plus resting HR to 70% HRR plus resting HR keep peak peak HR 10 beats < HR at ischemia Risk Stratify using AHA criteria
37
Stress Imaging Tests Abnormal resting ECG ST segments
Left bundle branch block LVH with strain Need for increased diagnostic accuracy sensitivity 85-90% specificity 85-90% localize ischemia to specific coronary vascular territory
39
Contrast Echo
40
Stress Echocardiogram: Apical septal wall ischemia
41
Stress Nuclear Testing tomographic imaging planes
Short Axis base to apex Vertical Long Axis septal to lateral Horizontal Long Axis anterior to inferior
42
normal nuclear perfusion scan
stress rest stress rest stress rest
43
lateral ischemia on nuclear perfusion scan
stress rest stress rest stress rest
44
Pharmacological Stress Tests
dobutamine echo Dobutamine beta agonist increases myocardial oxygen demand increases HR, BP, contractility
45
Pharmacological Stress Tests
nuclear perfusion scan Adenosine or Dipyridimole direct coronary vasodilator causes shifts in flow leading to relative reduction in flow distal to coronary stenosis minimal change in HR, BP, and contractility
46
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Pharmacologic Positron Emission Tomography (PET) vs. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) PET Energy: 511 KeV Resolution: 1.5 cm Protocol: 45 min Stress EF Myocardial flow quantification More expensive than SPECT SPECT Energy: KeV Resolution: 2.0 cm Protocol: 2-3 h ( or 2 d) Post-Stress EF Courtesy of Edward Miller, MD, PhD
47
www.americanheart.org Scientific publications For more information
Statements and guidelines Exercise standards -2013 47
48
Elective in Stress Testing
Second and third year residents 3 weeks – preferably continuous Fellow surrogate Certification in Exercise-ECG Testing Supervision and interpretation Exposure to stress echo and stress nuclear
50
Approximate METs during Stationary Cycle Testing
Body weight Exercise rate (kg · m · min-1 and watts) kg Lb Kpms 300 Watts 50 450 75 600 100 750 125 900 150 1050 175 1200 200 110 5.1 6.9 8.6 10.3 12.0 13.7 15.4 60 132 4.3 5.7 7.1 10.0 11.4 12.9 70 154 3.7 4.9 6.1 7.3 9.8 11.0 80 176 3.2 5.4 6.4 7.5 9.6 90 198 2.9 3.8 4.8 6.7 7.6 220 2.6 3.4 6.0 7.7
51
Myocardial Contractility
52
Myocardial Wall Stress
P x R/ Th Th R P
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.