1. Chapter 21 Solid and Hazardous Waste

2. 21-1 What Are Solid Waste and Hazardous Waste, and Why Are They Problems?
Concept Solid waste contributes to pollution and represents the unnecessary consumption of resources; hazardous waste contributes to pollution as well as to natural capital degradation, health problems, and premature deaths.

3. We Throw Away Huge Amounts of Useful Things and Hazardous Materials (1)
Solid waste
Industrial solid waste
Mines, farms, industries
Municipal solid waste (MSW)
“Trash”
Hazardous waste (toxic waste)
Threatens human health of the environment
Organic compounds
Toxic heavy metals
Radioactive waste

4. Recovery =
Recycling +
Composting

9. Municipal Solid Waste in the United States
Leader in solid waste problem
What is thrown away?
Leader in trash production, by weight, per person
Approximately 4.4 lbs. per person per day
(recent NY Times article)
Recycling is helping

10. Total and Per Capita Production of Municipal Solid Waste in the U.S.
Figure 21.4: This graph shows the total and per capita production of municipal solid waste in the United States, 1960–2008. (Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
Fig. 21-4, p. 560

11. Hundreds of Millions of Discarded Tires in a Dump in Colorado
Figure 21.5: Hundreds of millions of discarded tires have accumulated in this massive tire dump in Midway, Colorado (USA). Lehigh Technologies has developed a recycling method that uses liquid nitrogen to freeze the scrap tires, making them brittle. The rubber is then pulverized into a fine powder, which can be used in a variety of products such as paints, sealants, and coatings. A preventive approach to managing this waste would be to double the average lifetime of tires in order to reduce the number thrown away each year.
Fig. 21-5, p. 561

12. Pay as you throw
In communities with pay-as-you-throw programs (also known as unit pricing or variable-rate pricing), residents are charged for the collection of municipal solid waste—ordinary household trash—based on the amount they throw away. This creates a direct economic incentive to recycle more and to generate less waste.
Traditionally, residents pay for waste collection through property taxes or a fixed fee, regardless of how much—or how little—trash they generate. Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) breaks with tradition by treating trash services just like electricity, gas, and other utilities. Households pay a variable rate depending on the amount of service they use.
Fort Worth, TX, proportion of households recycling:
21% to 85%

13. 21-2 How Should We Deal with Solid Waste?
Concept A sustainable approach to solid waste is first to reduce it, then to reuse or recycle it, and finally to safely dispose of what is left.

14. We Can Burn or Bury Solid Waste or Produce Less of It
Waste Management
Reduce harm, but not amounts
Waste Reduction
Use less and focus on reuse, recycle, compost
Integrated waste management
Uses a variety of strategies

15. Integrated Waste Management: Priorities for Dealing with Solid Waste
Figure 21.7: Integrated waste management: The U.S. National Academy of Sciences suggests these priorities for dealing with solid waste. To date, these waste-reduction priorities have not been followed in the United States or in most other countries. Instead, most efforts are devoted to waste management through disposal (bury it, burn it, or send it somewhere else). Question: Why do you think most countries do not follow these priorities, even though they are based on reliable science? (Data from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. National Academy of Sciences)
Integrated waste management: The U.S. National Academy of Sciences suggests these priorities for dealing with solid waste. To date, these waste-reduction priorities have not been followed in the United States or in most other countries. Instead, most efforts re devoted to waste management through disposal (bury it, burn it, or send it somewhere else).
Question: Why do you think most countries do not follow these priorities,
even though they are based on reliable science?

16. NY Times article: The Side Effects of Consumerism

17. 21-3 Why Are Reusing and Recycling Materials So Important?
Concept Reusing items decreases the consumption of matter and energy resources, and reduces pollution and natural capital degradation; recycling does so to a lesser degree.

18. Reuse: Important Way to Reduce Solid Waste, Pollution, and Save Money
Reuse: clean and use materials over and over
Downside of reuse in developing countries
Salvaging poor exposed to toxins
Flea markets, yard sales, Goodwill, eBay, Craigslist, freecycle.org
Rechargeable batteries

19. There Are Two Types of Recycling (1)
Primary, closed-loop recycling
Materials recycled into similar
products
Secondary recycling
Materials converted to other products: tires
Types of wastes that can be recycled
Preconsumer: internal waste
Postconsumer: external waste

20. There Are Two Types of Recycling (2)
Do items actually get recycled?
What are the numbers?

21. Case Study: Recycling Paper
55% of world’s tree harvest used to make paper
Pulp and paper industry 5th largest energy consumer, and uses more water per unit weight of product produced than any industry.
Recycled paper:
64% less energy
35% less water pollution
74% less air pollution
Replacement of chlorine-based bleaching chemicals with H2O2 or O2
Total wastepaper recycling rates:
United States: 50%
Denmark: 97%
South Korea: 77%

22. Case Study: Recycling Plastics
Plastics: composed of resins created from oil and natural gas
In U.S., only about 4% (by weight) of all plastic wastes is recycled.
Litter: beaches, oceans
Kills wildlife
Gets into food chain and seafood

23. Trade-Offs: Recycling
Figure 21.12: Recycling solid waste has advantages and disadvantages (Concept 21-3). Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 569

24. We Can Encourage Reuse and Recycling (1)
What hinders reuse and recycling?
Market prices don’t include harmful costs associated with production, use, discarding
Recycling industries get less favorable government treatment than large industries do
Prices for recycled materials fluctuate

25. We Can Encourage Reuse and Recycling (2)
Government
Increase subsidies and tax breaks for using such products
Decrease subsidies and tax breaks for making items from virgin resources
Fee-per-bag collection
New laws
Citizen pressure

26. 21-4 The Advantages and Disadvantages of Burning or Burying Solid Waste
Concept Technologies for burning and burying solid wastes are well developed, but burning contributes to air and water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and buried wastes eventually contribute to the pollution and degradation of land and water resources.

27. Solutions: A Waste-to-Energy Incinerator with Pollution Controls
Figure 21.13: Solutions.
A modern waste-to-energy incinerator with pollution controls burns mixed solid wastes and recovers some of the energy to produce steam to use for heating or producing electricity. Great Britain burns about 90% of its MSW in incinerators and Denmark burns about 54%, compared to 13% in the United States and 8% in Canada. To be economically feasible, incinerators must be fed huge volumes of trash every day. This encourages trash production and discourages reuse, recycling, and waste reduction. Questions: Would you invest in such a project? Why or why not?
Fig , p. 571

28. Trade-Offs: Waste-to-Energy Incineration
Figure 21.14: Waste-to-energy incineration of solid waste has advantages and disadvantages (Concept 21-4). These trade-offs also apply to the incineration of hazardous waste. Since 1985, more than 280 new incinerator projects have been delayed or canceled in the United States because of high costs, concern over air pollution, and intense citizen opposition. Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Dioxins--Fact Sheet from W.H.O.
Fig , p. 571

29. Burying Solid Waste Has Advantages and Disadvantages
Open dumps
Widely used in less-developed countries
Rare in developed countries
Sanitary landfills

30. Solutions: State-of-the-Art Sanitary Landfill
Leachate
Figure 21.15: Solutions.
A state-of-the-art sanitary landfill is designed to eliminate or minimize environmental problems that plague older landfills. Since 1997, only modern sanitary landfills have been permitted in the United States. As a result, many small, older landfills have been closed and replaced with larger local or regional landfills. Question: Some experts say that these landfills will eventually develop leaks and could emit toxic liquids. How do you think this could happen?
Fig , p. 572

31. Trade-Offs: Sanitary Landfills
Figure 21.16: Using sanitary landfills to dispose of solid waste has advantages and disadvantages (Concept 16-4). Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 572

32. 21-5 How Should We Deal with Hazardous Waste?
Concept A sustainable approach to hazardous waste is first to produce less of it, then to reuse or recycle it, then to convert it to less hazardous materials, and finally, to safely store what is left.

33. Integrated Hazardous Waste Management
Figure 21.17: Integrated hazardous waste management: The U.S. National Academy of Sciences has suggested these priorities for dealing with hazardous waste (Concept 21-5). Question: Why do you think that most countries do not follow these priorities? (Data from U.S. National Academy of Sciences)
Fig , p. 573

34. Core Case Study: E-waste— An Exploding Problem (1)
Electronic waste, e-waste: fastest growing solid waste problem
Most ends up in landfills and incinerators
Composition includes
High-quality plastics
Valuable metals
Toxic and hazardous pollutants
Readings for Thursday

35. We Can Detoxify Hazardous Wastes
Collect and then detoxify
Physical methods
Chemical methods
Use nanomagnets
Bioremediation
Phytoremediation
Incineration
Using a plasma arc torch

36. Solutions: Phytoremediation
Figure 21.18: Solutions.
Phytoremediation involves using various types of plants that function as pollution sponges to clean up contaminants such as radioactive substances (left), organic compounds (center), and toxic metals (right) from soil and water. (Data from American Society of Plant Physiologists, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Edenspace)
Fig , p. 575

37. Trade-Offs: Plasma Arc
Figure 21.19: Using a plasma arc torch to detoxify hazardous wastes has advantages and disadvantages. Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 576

38. We Can Store Some Forms of Hazardous Waste (1)
Burial on land or long-term storage
Last resort only
Deep-well disposal
64% of hazardous liquid wastes in the U.S.

39. Trade-Offs: Deep-Well Disposal
Figure 21.20: Injecting liquid hazardous wastes into deep underground wells has advantages and disadvantages. Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 576

40. We Can Store Some Forms of Hazardous Waste (2)
Surface impoundments
Lined ponds or pits
Secure hazardous landfills

41. Surface Impoundment in Niagara Falls, New York
Figure 21.21: This surface impoundment for storing liquid hazardous wastes is located in Niagara Falls, New York (USA). Such sites can pollute the air and nearby ground water and surface water.
Fig , p. 577

42. Trade-Offs Surface Impoundments
Figure 21.22: Storing liquid hazardous wastes in surface impoundments has advantages and disadvantages. Questions: Which single advantage and which single disadvantage do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 577

43. Solutions: Secure Hazardous Waste Landfill
Figure 21.23: Solutions.
This diagram shows how hazardous wastes can be isolated and stored in a secure hazardous waste landfill.
Fig , p. 577

44. What Can You Do? Hazardous Waste
Figure 21.24: Individuals matter.
You can reduce your output of hazardous wastes (Concept 21-5). Questions: Which two of these measures do you think are the most important? Why?
Fig , p. 578

45. Case Study: Hazardous Waste Regulation in the United States (1)
1976: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Congress enacted RCRA to address the increasing problems the nation faced from its growing volume of municipal and industrial waste. RCRA amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act of It set national goals for:
Protecting human health and the natural environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.
Energy conservation and natural resources.
Reducing the amount of waste generated, through source reduction and recycling
Ensuring the management of waste in an environmentally sound manner.[2]
It is now most widely known for the regulations promulgated under RCRA that set standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous waste in the United States.
Cradle to grave
Covers only 5% of hazardous wastes

46. Case Study: Hazardous Waste Regulation in the United States (2)
1980: Comprehensive Environmental, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
National Priorities List
2010: 1300 sites
340 sites cleaned so far
Pace of cleanup has slowed
Superfund is broke
Brownfields properties whose expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off green spaces and working lands.

47. Love Canal
Revisiting Love Canal

48. 21-6 How Can We Make the Transition to a More Sustainable Low-Waste Society?
Concept Shifting to a low-waste society requires individuals and businesses to reduce resource use and to reuse and recycle wastes at local, national, and global levels.

49. Grassroots Action Has Led to Better Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
“Not in my backyard”
Produce less waste
“Not in anyone’s backyard”
“Not on planet Earth”

50. Providing Environmental Justice for Everyone Is an Important Goal
Everyone is entitled to protection from environmental hazards
Which communities in the U.S. have the largest share of hazardous waste dumps?
Environmental discrimination

51. International Treaties Have Reduced Hazardous Waste (1)
Basel Convention
1992: in effect
1995 amendment: bans all transfers of hazardous wastes from industrialized countries to less-developed countries
2009: Ratified by 195 countries, but not the United States

52. International Treaties Have Reduced Hazardous Waste (2)
In 2000, delegates from 122 countries completed a global treaty in Stockholm to phase out the “dirty dozen” Persistent Organic Compounds (POPS).
EPA: “Though the United States is not yet a Party to the Stockholm Convention, the Convention has played a prominent role in the control of harmful chemicals on both a national and global level. For example, EPA and the states have significantly reduced the release of dioxins and furans to land, air, and water from U.S. sources. In addition to assessing dioxins, EPA has also been working diligently on the reduction of DDT from global sources.”
Everyone on earth has POPs in blood

53. We Can Make the Transition to Low-Waste Societies
Norway, Austria, and the Netherlands
Committed to reduce resource waste by 75%
East Hampton, NY, U.S.
Reduced solid waste by 85%
Follow guidelines to prevent pollution and reduce waste

54. Three Big Ideas
The order of priorities for dealing with solid waste should be to produce less of it, reuse and recycle as much of it as possible, and safely dispose of what is left.
The order of priorities for dealing with hazardous waste should be to produce less of it, reuse or recycle it, convert it to less hazardous material, and safely store what is left.

55. Three Big Ideas
We need to view solid wastes as wasted resources and hazardous wastes as materials that we should not be producing in the first place.