1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Protecting People from Motor Vehicle-related Deaths and Injuries: Keeping People Safe on the Road – Every Day July 2012

2.  Tobacco use  Nutrition/obesity (including food safety)  HIV  Healthcare-associated infections  Motor vehicle crashes  Teen pregnancy Preventing motor vehicle injuries and deaths is a CDC “Winnable Battle”

3. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts: 2010 Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2012. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811552.pdf. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online]. www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars.  Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of injury death in the United States  Motor vehicle-related injuries send more than 4 million people to hospital emergency departments every year  Motor vehicle crashes killed nearly 33,000 people in 2010 – that’s 90 people every day Crashes are the # 1 cause of injury death

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. (2012). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (producer). www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars. Motor vehicle crash deaths Number of deaths in 2009 Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children and young adults (ages 5-24)

5. Naumann RB, Dellinger AM, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence B, Miller TR. Incidence and Total Lifetime Costs of Motor Vehicle-Related Fatal and Nonfatal Injury by Road User Type, United States, 2005. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2010;11(4):353-60. Motor Vehicle Occupants $70 Billion Motorcyclists $12 Billion Pedestrians $10 Billion Pedalcyclists $5 Billion Other $2 Billion Total Cost: $99 Billion in medical and lost work costs Motor vehicle-related crash injuries and deaths cost ~$100 billion in 2005

6. Seat belts and child passenger safety Teen driver safety Alcohol-impaired driving Preventing crash-related deaths involves three priority areas

7. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts : Lives Saved in 2010 by Restraint Use and Minimum-Drinking-Age Laws. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2012. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811580.pdf. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts: Seat Belt Use in 2010—Use rates in the states and territories. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2011. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811493.pdf. If everyone had worn a seat belt on every trip in 2010, more than 3,341 additional lives would have been saved  Seat belts saved an estimated 12,546 lives in 2010  Seat belt use still varies widely In some states seat belt use exceeds 90%, while in others nearly 30% fail to buckle up Seat belts save thousands of lives each year

8. Department of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Traffic Safety Facts 2010: Children. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2012. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/  Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children  Child safety seats reduce deaths by 71% for infants (younger than 1 year old) and by 54% for toddlers (1-4 years old)  Among children under age 5, an estimated 285 lives were saved by child safety seat use in 2010 Child passenger restraints prevent serious injury and death

9. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts: Occupant Protection. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2009. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811160.pdf. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts: Seat Belt Use in 2010. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2010. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811378.pdf. Beck LF, West BA. Vital Signs: Motor Vehicle Occupant Nonfatal Injuries (2009) and Seat Belt Use (2008) Among Adults—United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In Review 2011. Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS). Safety belt and child restraint laws. http://www.iihs.org/laws/SafetyBeltUse.aspx In 2012, eighteen states still did not have a primary enforcement law  Do they work? Yes – states with primary enforcement seat belt laws achieve significantly higher seat belt use than secondary law states  What are they? Primary enforcement seat belt laws allow law enforcement to pull over a motorist solely for not wearing a seat belt Primary enforcement seat belt laws increase seat belt use

10.  Seat Belts CDC is providing scientific expertise and consultation, and engaging with stakeholders to increase seat belt usage in states  Booster Seats CDC is collaborating with national and state partners to develop a Booster Seat Planning Guide to provide scientific expertise on promoting booster seat use CDC’s Injury Center shares evidence on seat belts, child restraints

11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. (2012). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (producer). www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars. NHTSA [2010]. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis. www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx. Heart Disease 3% All Other Causes 6% Suicide 17% Homicide 19% Other Unintentional Injuries 16% Cancer 6% Motor Vehicle Injuries 33% Leading Cause of Death for Teens (ages 15-19, 2009)  Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens More than 3,200 teens ages 15-19 were killed in vehicle crashes in 2009  Crashes involving teens ages 15-19 cost $14 billion annually Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. (2010). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (producer) www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars.  Does it work? If every state had a strong GDL system, we could reduce the number of 16-year-olds involved in fatal crashes by 20% Research suggests that the most comprehensive GDL programs can reduce fatal crashes by 38%  What is GDL? GDL gives teens driving privileges in stages, helping new drivers gain experience in low-risk conditions Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) saves teen lives

13. Strong GDL programs have a three-stage process: 1.Learner’s Permit Permits are only be available to drivers at least 16 years old, and are held for a mandatory 6 months 2.Probationary License Probationary licenses prohibit unsupervised nighttime driving and limit the number of passengers accompanying a driver without adult supervision 3.Full License A driver only obtains full driving privileges after turning 18 Effective GDL programs require three stages

14.  Getting parents involved CDC released a communications campaign toolkit, Parents Are the Key, to help parents learn about the most dangerous driving situations for their young driver and how to avoid them. (Available online at: www.cdc.gov/parentsarethekey) www.cdc.gov/parentsarethekey  Strengthening GDL In collaboration with external partners, CDC identified evidence- base strategies for the development of a state GDL Planning Guide Currently being pilot tested in eight states CDC’s Injury Center promotes evidence on GDL systems across the country

15. Dept of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). ). Traffic Safety Facts: 2010 data: Alcohol-impaired driving. Washington (DC): NHTSA; 2012. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811606.pdf. Zador PL, Krawchuk SA, Voas RB. Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2000;61:387-95. Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Siegel P, Sleet DA, Mokdad AH, Shults RA, Flowers N. Alcohol-impaired driving among U.S. adults, 1993-2002. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005;28(4):346-350. If all drivers had a blood alcohol content (BAC) level less than the illegal threshold (0.08%), more than 7,000 lives would have been saved in 2010  In 2010, 10,228 people died in alcohol- impaired crashes  Young people have the highest risk of being involved in an alcohol- impaired crash Nearly 1 in 3 crash deaths involve an impaired driver

16. Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, et al. Effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints for reducing alcohol-involved crashes. Traffic Injury Prevention 2002;3:266- 74.  What are sobriety checkpoints? At sobriety checkpoints, law enforcement officers stop drivers systematically to assess their level of alcohol impairment  Do they work? Yes – checkpoints reduce impaired driving crashes and deaths by a median of 20%  What can be done? Local and state law enforcement can use sobriety checkpoints to improve enforcement and deter impaired driving Sobriety checkpoints reduce alcohol-impaired driving

17. Guide to Community Preventive Services. Reducing alcohol-impaired driving: Lower BAC for Young or Inexperienced Drivers. [cited 2010 Oct 20]. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/mvoi/AID/mlda-laws.html.  What are zero tolerance laws? Zero tolerance laws set a lower legal blood alcohol content (BAC), usually between any detectable BAC and 0.02%, for drivers under 21  Do they work? Yes – zero tolerance laws lower fatal crash rates between 9 to 24%  What can be done? States can actively enforce zero tolerance laws and maintain the current minimum legal drinking age at 21 Zero tolerance laws reduce teen drinking and driving crashes

18. Guide to Community Preventive Services. Reducing alcohol-impaired driving: ignition interlocks. [cited 2010 Oct 20]. www.thecommunityguide.org/mvoi/AID/ignitioninterlocks.html.  What are ignition interlocks? Ignition interlocks are devices installed in vehicles to prevent people who have consumed alcohol from driving  Do they work? Yes – installation of interlocks reduces the re-arrest rate of convicted DUI offenders by about 70%  What can be done? States can implement ignition interlocks for everyone convicted of a DUI, even on a first offense Ignition interlocks keep DUI offenders from offending again

19.  Evaluating ignition interlock programs CDC and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration sponsored a National Ignition Interlock Summit and are evaluating ignition interlock programs  Working to prevent alcohol-related injuries in college communities CDC’s Injury Center is working to develop and test strategies for colleges and universities to prevent impaired driving CDC’s Injury Center supports efforts to keep impaired drivers off the road

20.  Motor Vehicle Safety: cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety  Seat Belts: cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/SeatBelts cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/SeatBelts  Child Passenger Safety: cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Child_Passenger_Safety cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Child_Passenger_Safety  Teen Driving: cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Teen_Drivers cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Teen_Drivers  Alcohol-Impaired Driving: cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Impaired_Driving cdc.gov/Motorvehiclesafety/Impaired_Driving For More Information, Visit…

21. For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333 Telephone, 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov Web: www.cdc.gov The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Motor Vehicle-related Deaths and Injuries Are Preventable