1. Response to Intervention: Creating a Systematic Response

2.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

3.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

4.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

5.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

6.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

7.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

8.  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

9. Systematic response for ALL

10. Core RTI Principles  all children  Intervene early  Use a multi-tier model of service delivery  Use a problem-solving method to make decisions within a multi-tier model  Use research-based, scientifically validated interventions/instruction to the extent available  Monitor student progress to inform instruction  Use data to make decisions  Use assessment for 3 different purposes  Screening, diagnostic, progress monitoring NASDSE, 2006

11. RTI Misconception RTI Misconception Is NotIs An instructional programA framework to implement effective practices A group of students that leaves your room for extra instruction A system of matching resources to each individuals student’s needs Possible to implement aloneA collaborative effort The same for every schoolUniquely designed for each building A special ed, a general ed, a Title 1, a Talented and Gifted initiative An “Every” Education Initiative An educational fadA systematic method for delivering instruction, based on research and effective large scale implementation

12. Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

13. Professional Development Special Education ELL District Office Resources Title Programs Curriculum Development Response to Intervention

14. RTI begins with General Education!  Teachers don’t fail students, systems do.  RTI is a system for differentiation of instruction!  RTI is a system that is predicated on the general education teachers’ skill and knowledge of instruction, assessment, curriculum, and children.

15. In The Past General Education Title Reading or Other Reading Support Special Education Some “Fell’” Through Some “Fell’” Through

16. Full Continuum of Support General Education Title Reading & Reading Support, Gifted Ed. Special Education, Gifted Ed. I I I I I I I I all along the continuum! I =

17. Reading Is Not Optional Kindergarten Fourth grade Behavior Problems Low graduation rates

18. Developmental lagSkill deficit Days and Weeks Matter We can’t wait for them to “bloom?” vs.

19. Good reading builds reading AND cognitive skills! Days and Weeks Matter

20. Differences Learning to Read Estimates from NICHD research Population %Journey to ReadingInstructional Requirements 5Easy: children read before starting school Need no formal decoding instruction 35Relatively EasyLearn to read regardless of instructional approach 40Formidable ChallengeNeed systematic and explicit instruction 20One of the most difficult tasks to be mastered in school Need intensive, systematic, direct, explicit instruction

21. A Tale of Two Systems Does the child find the system, or does the system find the child?

22. Pre-referral team (CARES) reviews what teacher has tried Jessie participates in the curriculum Jessie isn’t doing well Teacher tries again Resumes regular program Jessie doesn’t improve Jessie improves Teacher’s effort is deemed sufficient Special Education referral is initiated by the teacher Jessie’s teacher does his best to differentiate instruction and keeps anecdotal data Teacher is told to try again Jessie is tested, usually by special education personnel, using IQ, achievement, and other tests The pre referral/discrepancy approach

23. From the KWL What does the process entail? What are the steps to Special Education referral in RTI?

24. Daisy participates in the general core curriculum with strong instruction Daisy is screened and isn’t doing well Second Group Intervention Data Team designs individualized intervention Resumes general program Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause Special Education referral is initiated by the team Data Team reviews screening data and places Daisy in group intervention Parents Notified How RTI Works from a Student’s Perspective Progress monitoring and intervention data is used

25. Donald participates in the general curriculum with strong instruction Screening shows Donald Isn’t doing well EBIS Team conducts Individual Problem Solving & a more intensive intervention is selected Gains an Elective at the Quarter/semester Donald doesn’t improve Donald improves Donald doesn’t improve Donald improves Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause Special Education referral is initiated Team reviews achievement and behavioral data (school wide) and places Donald in an intervention class Evaluation planning meeting, Procedural safeguards provided, consent obtained, 60 school-day timeline starts Donald cycles through 2 times

26. Think, Pair, Share  How do the two team processes differ?  How are teams currently organized in your district?  How would your team process look different in a multi-tiered, RTI system?  Does the child find the system, or does the system find the child?

27. From the KWL What is a good model for large districts to implement successfully?

28. The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term CONSENSUS

29. So how do we make this happen? Universal screener Core Curriculum with strong instruction Decision rules and reading protocol Progress Monitoring Interventions

30. Leadership  District Level AND  School Level

31. Teaming  Principal  Classroom Teachers  Specialists  School Counselor  School Psychologist Collaborating

32. Teaming  Principal  Classroom Teachers  Specialists  School Counselor  School Psychologist Co-laboring

33. Delivery:  Ongoing  Anticipate and be willing to meet the newly emerging needs based on student and staff need and performance.  Sufficient time to collaborate and plan  Incorporates fidelity checks  Data ALSO used to drive professional development needs. Professional Development and Fidelity Professional Development and Fidelity

34.  5 minute walk through  Core program fidelity check  Intervention fidelity checks Professional Development and Fidelity Professional Development and Fidelity

35. Content:  Core curriculum & instruction  Assessment  Interventions  Teaming  Data-based decision making  SPED procedures Professional Development and Fidelity Professional Development and Fidelity

36. Universal Screening  Universal screening for ALL students at least three times per year  Good screening measures:  Efficient, brief, valid, reliable, unbiased and over- identifies  Screening is used as a key measure to determine:  The health of the core  Which students might need additional intervention

37. Core Program  Phonemic Awareness  Phonics  Fluency  Vocabulary  Comprehension  State standards  Scope and sequence PhonicsPhonics FluencyFluency Phonemic Awareness ComprhensionComprhension Vocabulary For all students!

38. Secondary Core Program The research based curriculum and instruction across all classes that allows students to access and respond to text across content areas.

39. Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation Extended time for literacy (2 – 4 hours of instruction and practice) Professional development Ongoing summative assessment of students and programs Teacher teams Leadership A comprehensive and coordinated literacy program

40. Decision Rules  Provide the “now what” after teams have analyzed student data  Guide decisions for all tiers  Take the guesswork out of “what to do next”  Ensure equity across schools I think… I feel… I believe What data do you have that makes you think/feel/believe that? - Dr. Ed Shapiro

42. Reading Protocol

43. From the KWL How do you know the right intervention?

44. Are the children learning? How can we tell? Progress Monitoring Tools Must Be:  Brief  Valid  Reliable  Repeatable  Easy to Administer Frequency:  Every 2 weeks (minimum)  Every week (ideal)

45. Aimline Determine Response to Intervention When a student fails to make adequate progress we should change their instruction to help her meet the goal Read Naturally Phonics for Reading Reading Mastery

46. Interventions  Must be designed to match identified needs  Is in addition to and aligns with the district core curriculum  Uses more explicit instruction  Provides more intensity  Additional modeling and guided feedback  Immediacy of feedback  Does NOT replace core

47. From the KWL What are some commonly used interventions? Examples.

48. Benefits Of an RTI System RTI will help you to:  Know immediately, “Is what we are doing working?”  Know which students need more/different  Know what each student needs  Provide structures to deliver what students need  Reduce rates of identification of student learning disabilities  Prevent reading problems before they occur  Raise student achievement

49. Do you have a systematic response?  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic

50. Do you have a systematic response?  Urgent  Directive  Timely  Targeted  Administered by trained professionals  Systematic