Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BIO-FREQUENCY SPECTRUM RADIATION & WOUND HEALING

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BIO-FREQUENCY SPECTRUM RADIATION & WOUND HEALING"— Presentation transcript:

1 BIO-FREQUENCY SPECTRUM RADIATION & WOUND HEALING
J. M. Schramm, M.A., R. A. Hardesty, M.D., K. C. Oberg, M.D., Ph.D.

2 BFS & WOUND HEALING PROBLEM & BACKGROUND GOALS & OBJECTIVES METHODS
RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS

3 CLINICAL PROBLEM Compromised wound healing (bed sores, DM, smokers)
Electromagnetic radiation in wound healing Microwave radiation in wound healing Infrared radiation in wound healing Bio-Frequency Spectrum (BFS) radiation

4 BACKGROUND: BFS & LIGHT SPECTRUM
Light frequency spectrum Microwave Infrared BFS

5 BACKGROUND: BFS RADIATION TREATMENT
Reported results of BFS treatment for bed sores Reported results from C. Kun, et. al., 1995.

6 GOALS & OBJECTIVES Controlled evaluation of wound healing
MacFarlane flap tissue survival Simple incision breaking strength

7 METHODS: EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Anesthesia Nembutal 2 cc/kg Flap design MacFarlane flap Standardization 4x10 cm template Stapled incision

8 METHODS: EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Anesthesia Nembutal 2 cc/kg Incisional design Midline incision Standardization 3 cm template Clipped incision

9 METHODS: TREATMENT PROTOCOL
Control group No treatment (Social cage 30 min. twice daily)

10 METHODS: TREATMENT PROTOCOL
Treatment groups Infrared radiation 30 min. twice daily BFS radiation 30 min. twice daily

11 RESULTS: DATA ANALYSIS
MacFarlane flap Planimetric analysis Surface area survivability

12 RESULTS: DATA ANALYSIS
Simple incision Tensiometer analysis Wound breaking strength

13 RESULTS: MACFARLANE FLAP
BFS treatment 22.0% (+/- 11.8%) p<.01 vs. controls p=.16 vs. IR IR treatment 30.3% (+/- 10.0%) Controls 36.9% (+/- 9.6%)

14 RESULTS: SIMPLE INCISION
BFS treatment 2.62N/mm2(+/-0.44N/mm2) p<.001 vs. controls p<.10 vs. IR IR treatment 2.26N/mm2(+/-0.38N/mm2) p<.03 vs. controls Controls 1.73N/mm2(+/-0.47N/mm2)

15 DISCUSSION BFS vs. Controls BFS vs. IR Less flap necrosis
Greater wound breaking strength p<.001 BFS vs. IR Trend towards less flap necrosis p=.16

16 CONCLUSIONS BFS as efficient as IR in wound healing BFS trends
Flap necrosis Simple incision tensile strength BFS trends Appears to show greater wound healing than IR Future research Verify results Expand to other models


Download ppt "BIO-FREQUENCY SPECTRUM RADIATION & WOUND HEALING"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google