Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ANITA G. MARASIGAN, MD FPPS, FSPCCM

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ANITA G. MARASIGAN, MD FPPS, FSPCCM"— Presentation transcript:

1 ANITA G. MARASIGAN, MD FPPS, FSPCCM
FLUID MANAGEMENT OF DENGUE FEVER AND DENGUE HEMORRHAGIC FEVER (2010 INTERIM GUIDELINES) ANITA G. MARASIGAN, MD FPPS, FSPCCM ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR FEU – NRMF MEDICAL CENTER

2 OBJECTIVES: To update the section on fluid management of the 2008 PPS Dengue Evidence – based guidelines. To develop clinical algorithms on fluid resuscitation of patients with Dengue based on clinical features.

3 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009
Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009 Case Definition for Dengue Fever Probable: An acute febrile illness with 2 or more of the following: headache Retro-orbital pain Arthralgia Rash Hemorrhagic manifestations Leukopenia Supportive serology Confirmed: a case confirmed by laboratory criteria Non severe Dengue w/o Warning Signs: Probable Dengue: live in/travel to dengue endemic areas. Fever and 2 of the following criteria Nausea Vomiting Aches and Pains Tourniquet test positive Laboratory Confirmed Dengue: (impt. when no sign of plasma leakage)

4 Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Case Definition for: Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) The Following must ALL be present: 1. Fever, or history of fever, lasting for 2 to 7 days, occasionally biphasic 2. Hemorrhagic tendencies evidenced by at least one of the following: (+) tourniquet test Petechiae, ecchymosis, purpura Bleeding from the mucosa, GIT, injection sites or other locations Hematemesis or melena

5 Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Case Definition for: Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) 3. Thrombocytopenia (100,000 cells/mm3 or less) 4. Evidence of plasma leakage due to increased vascular permeability, manifested by at least one of the following: A rise in the hematocrit equal to or greater than 20% above average for age, sex and population a drop in the hematocrit following volume replacement treatment equal to or greater than 20% of baseline Signs of plasma leakage such as pleural effusion, ascites and hypoproteinemia.

6 Hypotension for age AND Cold, clammy skin and restlessness
Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Case Definition for: Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS) All of the four criteria for DHF must be present, plus evidence of circulatory failure manifested by: Hypotension for age AND Cold, clammy skin and restlessness

7 DHF Grade I Grading of Severity of DHF/DSS
Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009 Grading of Severity of DHF/DSS DHF Grade I Fever accompanied by non-specific constitutional signs & symptoms such as anorexia, vomiting, & abdominal pain The only hemorrhagic manifestation is a (+) tourniquet test &/or easy bruising Non severe Dengue w/o warning signs OR Dengue w/ (Mild) warning signs Fever and 2 of the following criteria: Nausea, Vomiting Rash Aches & pains Tourniquet test positive Leukopenia Any mild warning sign, eg. Mild abdominal pain or tenderness, mild liver enlargement

8 DHF Grade II Dengue w/ warning signs
Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009 Grading of Severity of DHF/DSS DHF Grade II Spontaneous bleeding in addition to manifestations of Grade I patients usually in the form of skin or other hemorrhages (mucocutaneous), GIT Dengue w/ warning signs Abdominal pain or tenderness Persistent vomiting Clinical fluid accumulation Mucosal bleed Lethargy, restlessness Liver enlargement >2cm Laboratory: increase in Hct concurrent with rapid decrease in platelet count Requires strict observation & medical intervention

9 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009
Current WHO Case Definition of Dengue and Levels of Severity (1997) as adapted by the PPS Clinical Practice Guidelines of Dengue 2008 Proposed WHO Classification and Levels of Severity 2009 DHF Grade III Circulatory failure manifested by rapid, weak pulse & narrowing of pulse pressure or hypotension w/ the presence of cold clammy skin and restlessness Severe Dengue Should be considered if the patient is from an area of dengue risk presenting with fever of 2-7 days plus any of the following features: Severe plasma leakage, leading to: Shock Fluid accumulation w/ resp. distress Severe bleeding, as evaluated by the clinician Severe organ impairment Liver: AST or ALT > 1000 CNS: impaired consciousness Heart & other organs DHF Grade IV Profound shock w. undetectable blood pressure or pulse

10 Notes: Shock Is a critical condition that results from inadequate delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the tissues to meet metabolic demands. Characterized by: Inadequate perfusion Low cardiac output

11 MOD ↓ Perfusion ↓ Cardiac Output Tissue hypoxia Anaerobic metabolism
↑ Lactic acid & CO2 Irreversible cellular damage Cardiovascular damage MOD

12 SEVERITY OF SHOCK Compensated shock Hypotensive shock
signs of reduced perfusion as long as SBP is maintained Hypotensive shock When compensatory mechanism fails & SBP drops SBP of <90mmHg or MAP <70mmHg or SBP decrease of >40mmHg of <2 SD below normal for age

13 ASSESSMENT Level of consciousness Heart rate – Increased
CRT – sluggish, delayed, > 2 secs. Pulse pressure – narrow Peripheral pulses – thready, absent Blood pressure – decreased Output – decreased (<1mL/kg/hr in infants) (<30ml/kg/hr in adolescents) Skin – cold, diaphoretic

14 TABLE 4: HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT: CONTINUM OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES
PARAMETERS STABLE CONDITION COMPENSATED SHOCK HYPOTENSIVE SHOCK Sensorium Clear & Lucid (shock can be missed if you don’t touch the patient) Change of mental status (restless & combative) CRT Brisk (<2sec ) Prolonged (>2sec) Very prolonged, mottled skin Extremities Warm & pink Cool peripheries Cold & clammy Peripheral Pulse Good volume Weak & thready Feeble or absent Source: WHO & Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases, Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention & Control, 2009

15 TABLE 4: HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT: CONTINUM OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES
PARAMETERS STABLE CONDITION COMPENSATED SHOCK HYPOTENSIVE SHOCK Heart Rate Normal for age Tachycardia Severe tachycardia w/ bradycardia in late shock Blood Pressure Normal pulse pressure for age Normal SBP but rising DBP. Narrowing pulse pressure, Postural hypotension Narrowed pulse pressure (<20mmHg) Hypotension, Unrecordable BP, Metabolic Acidosis Resp. Rate Tachypnea Hyperpnea, Kussmaul breathing Source: WHO & Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases, Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention & Control, 2009

16 Fluid Management of Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever
A. Fluid Management for patients w/ DF/DHF (Dengue w/o warning signs) who are not admitted In patients w/ DF/DHF Grade I who are not admitted, oral rehydration solution should be given as follows based on weight, using currently recommended ORS Reduced osmolarity ORS containing Na 45 – 60mmol/L Sports drinks (Na), <20meqs should not be given Body Weight (Kg) ORS to be given > 3-10 100 mL/kg/day > 10-20 75 mL/kg/day > 20–30 50-60 mL/kg/day > 30-60 40-50 mL/kg/day

17 Fluid Management of Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever
B. Fluid Management for patients who are admitted, without shock (DH/DHF Grade I & II or Dengue w/o warning signs Isotonic solutions (D5LRS, D5 Acetate Ringers, D5 NSS or 0.9 NaCl) are appropriate for DHF patients who are admitted but without shock. Maintenance IVF computed using the caloric expenditure method (Holliday Segar Method) or calculation based on Weight (Barnes & Young Method) Body Weight (Kg) Total Fluid Requirement (mL/day) 0-10 100 mL/kg > 10-20 1000 mL + 50mL/kg for each kg > 10kg > 20 1000 mL + 50mL/kg for each kg > 20kg

18 Fluid Management of Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever
If the patient shows signs of mild dehydration, the volume needed for mild dehydration is added to maintenance fluids over the next 6-8 hours. The following formula may be used to calculate the required volume of intravenous fluid to infuse: Maintenace IVF + Fluids as for Mild Dehydration Where volume of fluids for mild dehydration is computed as follows (to be added to the maintenance fluid volume): Infant 50ml/kg/6-8 hours Older Child or Adult 30 mL/kg/6-8 hours

19 Fluid Management of Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever
Periodic reassessment is needed so that fluid rate may be adjusted accordingly. After 6-8 hours, fluid rate is computed at maintenance rate over hours Clinical parameters should be monitored closely & correlated w/ hematocrit. This will ensure adequate hydration, avoiding under and over hydration. The IVF rate may be decreased any time as needed.

20 Improvement (b) See table 4
C. Fluid Management for patients ADMITTED to the hospital w/ DHF GRADE III (Compensated Shock) Compensated shock (systolic pressure maintained but has signs of plasma leakage (hemoconcentration or reduced perfusion) Box A. Obtain baseline Hct (a) Fluid resuscitation with plain isotonic crystalloid 10-15ml/kg/hour over 1 hour. Give oxygen support Improvement (b) See table 4 Yes No Box B. IV Crystalloid 5-7ml/kg/hr for 1-2 hours, then reduce to 3-5 ml/kg/hr for 2-4 hours; reduce to 2-3 ml/kg/hr for 2-4 hours; Fluids should not exceed 3L/day to avoid fluid overload. If feasible, monitor Hct every 8-12 hours or as necessary (a) Reassess hemodynamic status frequently (see table 4) including urine output (f) Monitor signs of bleeding If patient is stable & Hct increases by 10% from baseline, correlate clinically & assess need to increase fluid rate If patient is unstable and Hct increases, go to Box B. If patient is unstable & there is a sudden drop in Hct, look for signs of bleeding. Consider transfusion w/ fresh whole blood 20ml/kg or pRBC 10ml/kg If patient is stable for 48 hours, stop IVF or give maintenance fluids or ORS

21 Improvement (b) See table 4
C. Fluid Management for patients ADMITTED to the hospital w/ DHF GRADE III (Compensated Shock) Compensated shock (systolic pressure maintained but has signs of plasma leakage (hemoconcentration or reduced perfusion) Box A. Obtain baseline Hct (a) Fluid resuscitation with plain isotonic crystalloid 10-15ml/kg/hour over 1 hour. Give oxygen support Improvement (b) See table 4 Yes No Box C. Administer 2nd bolus of fluid, colloid/crystalloid (c ) 10-20ml/kg/hr in 1 hour Box B. Box D. If there are signs of occult/ overt bleeding Patient is stable Hct Decreases Patient is unstable Hct Increases Administer 3rd bolus of fluid (colloid/ crystalloid) 10-20ml/kg/hr for 1 hour Go to Box B Box E. If patient does not improve, consider inotropes (d) & refer to tertiary center If patient improves, go to Box B

22 If patient does not improve, go to Box E
C. Fluid Management for patients ADMITTED to the hospital w/ DHF GRADE III (Compensated Shock) Compensated shock (systolic pressure maintained but has signs of plasma leakage (hemoconcentration or reduced perfusion) Box A. Obtain baseline Hct (a) Fluid resuscitation with plain isotonic crystalloid 10-15ml/kg/hour over 1 hour. Give oxygen support Improvement (b) See table 4 Yes No Box B. Box C. Box D. If there are signs of occult/ overt bleeding, initiate transfusion with fresh whole blood 20ml/kg or prbc 10ml/kg Reassess hemodynamic status & bleeding parameters If improved, go to Box B If patient does not improve, go to Box E

23 Improvement (b) See table 4
D. Fluid Management for patients admitted to the hospital w/ shock DHF IV/DSS (Hypotensive Shock) HYPOTENSIVE SHOCK Box A. Obtain baseline Hct (a) fluid resuscitation w/ 20ml/kg plain isotonic crystalloid or colloid over 15 mins. ( c). Give oxygen support Improvement (b) See table 4 Yes No If patient is stable & Hct increases by 10% from baseline, correlate clinically & assess need to increase fluid rate Box B. Crystalloid/ Colloid 10mL/kg/hr for 1 hr, then continue w/: 5-7ml/kg/hr for 1-2 hrs; Reduce to 3-5 ml/kg/hr for 2-4 hrs; Reduce to 2-3 ml/kg/hr for 2-4 hrs. Fluids should not exceed 3L/day to avoid fluid overload. If feasible, monitor Hct every 6 hrs or as necessary. Reassess hemodynamic status frequently (see table 4) including output (f). Monitor signs of bleeding. If patient is unstable & Hct increases, go to Box B. If patient is unstable & there is a sudden drop in Hct, look for signs of bleeding. Consider transfusion w/ fresh whole blood 20ml/kg or pRBC 10ml/kg If patient is stable for 48 hours, stop IVF or give maintenance fluids or ORS

24 Improvement (b) See table 4
D. Fluid Management for patients admitted to the hospital w/ shock DHF IV/DSS (Hypotensive Shock) HYPOTENSIVE SHOCK Box A. Obtain baseline Hct (a) fluid resuscitation w/ 20ml/kg plain isotonic crystalloid or colloid over 15 mins. ( c). Give oxygen support Improvement (b) See table 4 Yes No Box C. Administer 2nd bolus of fluid, (colloid) 10-20ml/kg over ½ to 1 hr. Check hemodynamic parameters (see table 4) Box D. If there are signs of occult/ overt bleeding initiate transfusion w/ fresh whole blood 20ml/kg or prbc 10ml/kg Reassess hemodynamic status & bleeding parameters Box B. Patient is stable Hct Decreases Patient is unstable Hct Increases Reduce IVF rate to 7-10ml/kg/hr for 1-2 hrs Administer 3rd bolus of fluid (colloid/ crystalloid) 10-20ml/kg/hr for 1 hour If improved, go to Box B If patient improves, go to Box B Box E. If patient does not improve, consider inotropes (d) & refer to tertiary center If patient remains stable, go to Box B. If patient doesn’t improve, go to Box E

25 Notes If Hct is not readily available, assess hemodynamic status of patient using parameters in table 5. Assessment of improvement should be based on 7 parameters: mental status, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, capillary refill time, peripheral blood volume and extremities

26 Crystalloids (Ringer’s Lactate or 0.9 NaCl Solutions
Have been shown to be safe & effective as colloid solutions (dextran, starch or gelatin Comparable to colloids in terms of total amount of fluids used in resuscitation in moderately severe (compensated) dengue shock8-12 Colloids are associated with increased risk of allergic reactions and new bleeding manifestations10-11 Colloids may be used in patients who primarily present with hemodynamic instability 8-12 Jalal SLR et al, The use of colloids and crystalloids in pediatric dengue shock; Dung NM et al, Fluid replacement in DSS; Ngan Ngo Thi et al,. Acute management of dengue; Wills Ba et al, Comparison of 3 fluid solutions for resuscitation; Prasetyo RV et al Comparison of efficacy and safety between hydroxyethyl starch and ringer lactate in children 10-11 Ngan Ngo Thi et al,. Acute management of dengue; Wills Ba et al, Comparison of 3 fluid solutions for resuscitation

27 Crystalloids (0.9% saline/ Normal saline/ NSS)
Saline is a suitable option for initial fluid resuscitation, but repeated large volumes of 0.9% saline may lead to hyperchloremic acidosis Hyperchloremic acidosis – may aggravate or be confused with lactic acidosis from prolonged shock When serum Cl level exceeds normal range, it is advisable to change the to other alternatives such as Ringer’s lactate solution

28 Ringer’s Lactate Has lower Na (131mmol/L) and Cl (115mmol/L) and osmolality of 273mOsm/L It may not be suitable for resuscitation of patients with severe hyponatremia It is a suitable solution after 0.9 Saline has been given and the serum Cl level has exceeded the normal range Avoided in liver failure and patients taking metformin where lactate metabolism may ne impaired

29 Colloids The types of Colloids are gelatin based, dextran based & starch based solutions One of the biggest concerns regarding their use is their impact on coagulation Dextrans – may bind to von Willebrand factor/Factor VIII complex and impair coagulation the most Dextran 40 can potentially cause an osmotic renal injury in hypovolemic patients

30 Colloids Gelatin has the least effect on coagulation among all the colloids but has the highest risk of allergic reaction Allergic reactions: Fever, chills and rigors have also been observed in Dextran 70

31 Hypotension Systolic pressure of <90mmHg
Mean arterial pressure of <70mmHg in adults Systolic blood pressure decrease of >40mmHg of <2 standard deviation below normal for age In children below 10 years of age the 5th centile for systolic pressure can be determined by the following formula: Systolic blood pressure = 70 + (age in yrs x 2)mmHg

32 Urine Output A good urine output indicates sufficient circulatory volume and may be used as an index or guide for decreasing the amount of fluid administered An adequate urine output is at least 1ml/kg/hr & urine specific gravity of is ideal WHO Dengue Guidelines 2009 – 0.5cc/kg/hr is considered acceptable and may have been chosen to avoid congestion in the course of the disease Monitor urine output hourly till the patient is out of shock then 1-2 hourly

33 Inotropes The use of inotropes should be decided on carefully and it should be started after adequate fluid volume has been administered. To calculate the AMOUNT of DOPAMINE to be added to 100 mL of IV base solution: mg of Dopamine = 6 x desired dose (mcg/kg/min) x wt(kg) desired fluid rate (ml/hr)

34 Inotropes To calculate the VOLUME of Drug to be added to 100 mL of IV base solution: mL of Dopamine = mg of drug (determined using formula above) Concentration of drug (mg/mL) Preparation of Dopamine: 40mg/mL and 80mg/mL

35 Appendix A Calculation of Fluids in Obese or Overweight Patients
For Obese & Overweight Patients, Use the Ideal Body Weight for Calculation of Fluid Infusion Estimated Body Weight or IBW (kg) Normal Maintenance fluid (mL/hr) based on Holliday-Segar Formula Fluid Regimen based on 2-3ml/kg/hr (ml/hr) Regimen based on 1.5-2mL/hr (ml/hr) 5 10 10-15 20 20-30 15 30 30-45 60 40-60 25 65 50-75 70 60-90 35 75 70-105 40 80 80-120 50 90 100 90-120 110 105—140 120

36 Estimated Ideal Body Weight for Overweight
or Obese Adults Height in cm Estimated Ideal Body weight in kg for Adult Males 150 50 45.5 160 57 52 170 66 61.5 180 75 70

37 Causes of Fluid Overload
Excessive and/or too rapid intravenous fluids Incorrect use of hypotonic rather than isotonic crystalloid solution Inappropriate use of large volumes of intravenous fluids in patients with unrecognized severe bleeding Inappropriate transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma, platelet concentrates and cryoprecipitates Continuation of intravenous fluids after plasma leakage has resolved (24-48 hrs from defervescence) Co-morbid conditions such as congenital or ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease and renal disease

38 Early Clinical Features of Fluid Overload
Respiratory distress, difficulty in breathing Rapid breathing Chest wall indrawing Wheezing rather than crepitant rales Large pleural effusions Tense ascites Increased jugular pressure hypertension

39 Sample Monitoring Sheet for Dengue Patients
Appendix C Sample Monitoring Sheet for Dengue Patients Parameters Date Time Sensorium Body temperature Respiratory rate Heart Rate Bloo pressure Pulse pressure/ volume Capillary refill time Temperature of extremities Abdominal pain Vomiting Bleeding IVF infusion rate Urine Output

40 Members of the Technical Working Group on the 2010 PPS Interim Guidelines on Fluid Management of DF/DHF Ma. Liza Antoinette M. Gonzales, MD: Overall Chair and Chair, Committee on Dengue, HV/AIDS, another Emerging Infectious disease Maria Anna P. Banez, MD: Co-chair, Committee on Dengue, HIV/AIDS, and other Emerging Infectious Diseases Members: Cynthia A. Aguirre , MD Benjamin T. Lim, MD Gyneth Lourdes G. Bibera , MD Anna Lisa T. Ong-Lim, MD Rosario Z. Capeding , MD Ma. Louisa U. Peralta , MD Reynaldo C. De Castro, Jr. , MD Anita G. Marasigan, MD Flerida G. Hernandez , MD Ma. Norma V. Zamora , MD Magdalena Lagamayo , MD Adviser: Arturo C. Ludan, MD Anna Lisa T. Ong-Lim , MD Anita G. Marasigan , MD

41 p THANK YOU !


Download ppt "ANITA G. MARASIGAN, MD FPPS, FSPCCM"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google