Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNyla Chipman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Why immunotherapy fails ? Stephen Durham Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London UK
2
Declaration Research funding, consultancy and lecture fees from ALK Abello Lecture fees from Allergy Therapeutics
3
wrong set up wrong patient wrong allergen(s) wrong dose wrong duration Why immunotherapy fails ?
4
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
5
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
6
Immunotherapy clinic
7
Leadership/organisation of allergy clinic Staff competencies (induction/training) Clinic facilities –bookings, observation space –storage for vaccines / skin test reagents –safety procedures –rescue equipment Immunotherapy protocols Alvarez-Cuesta E et al Allergy 2006; 61 Suppl. 82: 1-20
8
Staff competencies Evaluation of the patients’ condition Entering data in “Immunotherapy Record Form” Injection technique Dose modification Active observation of patients Early recognition of anaphylactic reactions Treatment /monitoring of anaphylactic reactions How to perform scheduled assessments Factors determining whether to continue/stop IT Alvarez-Cuesta E et al Allergy 2006; 61 Suppl. 82: 1-20
9
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
10
Selection of patients for immunotherapy Symptoms induced by allergen IgE to relevant allergen (SPT/RAST) Symptoms due to one or few allergens No contra-indications (severe asthma, beta/blockers, inability to comply with IT)
11
Arvidsson M, Löwhagen O Rak S J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:777-83 Immunotherapy in adults with birch allergy
12
Franklin Adkinson N et al New Engl J Med 1999; Immunotherapy in children with perennial asthma and multiple allergen sensitivities
13
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
14
Selection of allergen extracts Standardisation - in-house reference standards (IHRs) - units of biologic potency - major allergen content (5-20 mcg major Ag) - recombinant allergens Documented benefit (controlled trials) - efficacy - safety - children and adults - longterm effects
15
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 319-25 26 centres, n=410 100,000 SQ, 10,000 SQ and placebo
16
Grass pollen immunotherapy: UK immunotherapy study Frew AJ et al, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 319-25
17
p<0.001 p=0.027 Rhinoconjunctivitis QoL score 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 BaselineSeasonBaseline/Season 100,000 SQ-U10,000 SQ-UPlacebo 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 P=0.027 Frew AJ et al, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 319-25
18
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
19
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 1338-45
20
Sublingual Grass Tablet Immunotherapy J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 1338-45
21
Sublingual Grass Tablet Immunotherapy
22
Randomised DBPC trial (n=855). 3 doses v placebo 2,500 SQ-T 25,000 SQ-T 75,000 SQ-T Once daily 8 weeks pre-season and continued throughout season
23
Durham SR et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 802-9 Sublingual Grass Tablet Immunotherapy
24
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
25
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration - efficacy - tolerance Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
26
17% reduction in average seasonal daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptom (p<0.05) 23% reduction in average seasonal daily medication scores ( p<0.05) 8 Weeks Pre-Seasonal Treatment Calderon MA et al. Allergy 2007
27
> 8 Weeks Pre-Seasonal Treatment 37% reduction in average seasonal daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptom (p<0.0001) 47% reduction in average seasonal daily medication scores ( p<0.0001) Calderon MA et al. Allergy 2007
28
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration - efficacy - tolerance (persistent efficacy after withdrawal) Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
29
Durham SR et al New Engl J Med 1999;341:468-75 Grass pollen IT in adults: 3 years duration induces tolerance
30
House dust mite IT in children : 3 years duration induces tolerance Des Roches A et al, Allergy 1996; 51 :430-3
31
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;12:512-518 Can sublingual immunotherapy induce tolerance?
32
right set up right patient right allergen(s) right dose right duration - efficacy - tolerance Why immunotherapy succeeds ?
33
wrong set up wrong patient wrong allergen(s) wrong dose wrong duration - no efficacy - no tolerance Why immunotherapy fails?
34
Immunotherapy (high dose Ag) Th1 IFN IgG T r IL-10 TGF- IgG4 IgA APC Natural exposure (low dose Ag) + IgE Th2 B cell Eosinophil IgE IL-4 IL-5 Allergy (-) Robinson DS, Larche ML and Durham SR J Clin Invest 2004; 114: 1389-97
35
Two types of regulatory T cells Tr1 Th3 Tr1 cells IL-10 Foxp3? Th3 cells TGF- Adaptive Thn T reg CD4 + CD25 + T cells Foxp3 transcription factor Natural Thymus
36
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; April 17 th epub Phenotypic Tregs in the nasal mucosa CD3 CD25 Foxp3 CD3 IL-10 Foxp3 Controls hayfever Immunotherapy
37
Th2 responses prevent tolerance induction? Positive feedback Amplifier naivenaive TregTreg FOXP3 TGF-β, IL-10 IL-27IL-35 IL-27IL-35 NFAT Th2Th2 GATA3 resistor negative feedback Anti-IL-4 directed therapy to augment tolerance induction against allergens IL-4 TGF- IL-10 Mantel P-Y et al, PLOS Biology 2007; 5 (12): e329
39
Can we predict success or failure of immunotherapy?
40
late phase response IL-10 production Duration of allergen immunotherapy (weeks) 024681216202428323640444852 Change in response 2 weeks Grass pollen count Time course of biomarkers during immunotherapy J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121(5):1120-1125
41
Early skin response late phase response IgE-FAB inhibition Duration of allergen immunotherapy (weeks) 024681216202428323640444852 Change in response IgG4 Duration of allergen immunotherapy (weeks) 024681216202428323640444852 Change in response 4 weeks 8 weeks Late allergen-induced Skin Response Grass Pollen season Time course of changes in IL-10 and IgG-associated inhibitory activity J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121(5):1120-1125 Pollen count Time course of biomarkers during immunotherapy
42
MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST
48
025005000750010000 0 50 r= 0.0 5 p= 0.9 Symptom/Medication score Phl p 5 specific IgG4 (% binding) 100 p = 0.02 025005000750010000 40 60 80 100 r= - 0.6 5 % Inhibition of allergen/IgE binding to B cells Symptom/Medication score Correlation between clinical response (Sx/Rx) IgG4 and IgE-FAB inhibitory activity IgG4IgE-FAB Shamji M et al 2008, unpublished
49
Immunotherapy (high dose Ag) Th1 IFN IgG T r IL-10 TGF- IgG4 IgA APC Natural exposure (low dose Ag) + IgE Th2 B cell Eosinophil IgE IL-4 IL-5 Allergy (-) Robinson DS, Larche ML and Durham SR J Clin Invest 2004; 114: 1389-97
50
Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK M Calderon K T Nouri-Aria G Paraskavopoulos D R WilsonM R JacobsonL Wilcock C Pilette J N Francis C Schmidt-Weber S RadulovicM Shamji S J Till
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.