1. Climate Change and Food Security: Research on Adaptation in Ethiopia Salvatore Di Falco University of Geneva Switzerland salvatore.difalco@unige.ch

2. Outline Background Use of survey data for policy relevant research Case study => adaptation pay off and identification of the “best” strategies for food security Data needs Environment for Development (EfD): a success story 2

3. 1970-2004 (IPCC 2007) 3

4. Current agreements to limit emissions, even if implemented, will not stabilize atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and climate change Crop productivity to decrease “for even small local temperature increases (1 – 2° C)” (IPCC 2007) In many African countries => “yields from rain fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50% by 2020” (IPCC 2007, p.10) Serious implications for food security 4

5. How would the future look like? (IPCC, 2007)

6. Can we do without adaptation? Probably not The identification of climate change adaptation strategies is therefore vital in sub Saharan Africa 1.Autonomous adaptation => pay off? 2.What is the impact on food security of farmers’ decision to adopt some strategies in response to changes in temperature and/or precipitation? 3.What are the driving forces behind farmers’ decisions to adapt to climate change? 6

7. 7 Case study: Ethiopia Nile River Basin

8. 8 Agriculture accounts for about 40% of GDP, and 90% of exports, and 85% of employment (MoFED, 2007) Ethiopian agriculture is heavily dependent on natural rainfall, with irrigation agriculture accounting for less than 1% of the total cultivated land in the country Ethiopia suffers from extreme weather events: - frequent droughts (1965, 1974, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1990, 1991, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2009); - recent flooding (1997, and 2006) Food insecurity

9. 9 Data Partners: IFPRI, USA; Ethiopian Development Research Institute 1,000 crops farms (2,823 plots) 2004 and 2005 => Smallholders Agriculture Area: Ethiopia Nile River Basin Great survey on the issue! Use of farm specific weather data Thin Plate Spline method of spatial interpolation for imputation of farm and plot specific rainfall and temperature Perceptions and adaptation Extension services, tenure security, information + others In other 8 African countries

10. Systematically different between adapters and non adapters Some farmers are better than others… Unobservable characteristics of farmers and their farm may affect both the adaptation strategy decision and net revenues => inconsistent parameter estimates Self selection 10 Issues for quantitative analysis

11. 11 Ideally, we would like to have… Quantity produced by farmer X if DID adapt Quantity produced by farmer X if DID NOT adapt Control Group Treatment Group Compare the expected food productivity under the actual and counterfactual cases that farmer X adapted or not to climate change Statistical tools: Di Falco et al. 2011

12. 12 What Adaption to Climate Change actually is? What are the “best” strategies that can be implemented to deal with climatic change in the field What are the economic implications of different strategies? Identify the most successful strategies by implementing a counterfactual analysis

13. 13

14. Strategies (1) changing crop varieties only; (2) implementing only water strategies such as water harvesting, irrigation or water conservation; (3) implementing only soil conservation; (4) implementing water strategies and changing crop varieties; (5) implementing soil conservation and changing crop varieties (6) implementing water strategies and soil conservation (7) implementing water strategies, soil conservation, and changing crop varieties; (8) implementing other strategies. 14

15. Switching Regression Model (Di Falco et al. 2011; Di Falco and Veronesi; 2012) Two stage procedure 1.We estimate the probability of choosing a particular strategy (selection model where a representative farm household chooses to implement a specific strategy) 2.The information stemming from the first step is used on farm revenue, where farm net revenues are regressed against climatic variables and other control variables

16. 16

17. How do we get there? First stage of the model tells you exactly that Barriers and drivers for autonomous adaptation Besides climate and past shocks Trees as tenure security is important driver The dissemination of information on changing crops and implement conservation strategies are very important – increase awareness Extension services are very important in determining the implementation of adaptation strategies (also training)

18. Future research needs More (and better) surveys – involvement of local institutions (academia, research, training) Going back to areas previously interviewed Nile Basin: How things have changed How perception have changed How the barriers and drivers have changed Dynamic implication of adaptation strategies Long term vs short term responses

19. A platform is necessary: EfD Environmental economics and advocacy in developing countries for 20 years => SIDA (Swedish Development funded) Weak and underfunded academic institutions Academic brain-drain Government agencies unable to attract and maintain academic capacity for policy analysis Weak interface between academia and government Two pillars: building capacity (PhD programs and courses) Policy relevant research => on the field EfD centers

20. Characteristics of EfD centers Strong research capacity and facilities Connection to a graduate program Strong policy interface Efficient administration Ethiopia – EDRI/Addis Ababa University Ethiopia Kenya –University of Nairobi/KIPPRA Kenya China - Peking University China Tanzania – University of Dar es Salaam Tanzania South Africa – University of Cape Town South Africa Central America – CATIE Central America Sweden – EEU/UoG Sweden USA – Resources for the Future USA

21. Conclusions Adaptation in the field => food security Understanding what can be done to facilitate it Combination of surveys, methods Randomized controlled trials and field experiments can complement Building capacity is essential to face challenges of climate change Follow and expand experiences like EfD

22. Thank you very much salvatore.difalco@unige.ch

23. Multinomial endogenous switching regression model First Stage 23 if strategy j provides expected net revenues greater than any other strategy k  j (2)

24. Second stage: Multinomial Endogenous Switching 24 if the error terms of the selection model  ij are correlated with the error terms u ij of the net revenues functions (3a)-(3m), the expected values of u ij conditional on the sample selection are nonzero Estimates will be inconsistent by OLS