Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTyree Stringer Modified over 10 years ago
1
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
2
Objective of Study Explore the effect that large-scale ethanol production in Minnesota has had on CRP land protection, particularly with regards to CRP contracts near surface waters. 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
3
Issues of Potential Concern When crop prices are high and CRP rental rates are low, farmers can often make more money converting their land to crop production than keeping it enrolled in CRP. Converting CRP acres to cropland increases soil erosion and surface runoff, degrading and filling nearby wetlands and streams with sediment. Corn requires more pesticide input per acre than soy and most other food crops. In landscapes dominated by corn, estimates suggest that around 17.8 to 35.7 lbs of the nitrogen applied per acre is transported to downstream aquatic ecosystems each year. The amount of phosphorous lost from corn fields can range from 1.8 to 13.4 lbs per acre in a year. 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
4
Background USA: l 96.4 mil. acres in 2012, largest corn crop in 75 years l Corn prices can exceed $8.00/bu, Soybeans $12.00/bu l Land under CRP contract for the 2008 crop year: 34.66 million acres, down 2.11 million acres from 36.77 million acres in 2007. l States with the largest CRP declines: North Dakota and South Dakota, with losses of 400,000 and 248,000 acres, respectively. Source: USDA, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
5
The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) The CRP works to protect environmentally- sensitive farmland voluntarily submitted into the program. To determine which lands are eligible, the CRP uses an Environmental Benefits Index (EBI), which scores a parcel of land on various criteria for suitability for protection (proximity to water, rare or endangered species, slope, etc.). 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
8
Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference CORN
9
Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
11
Minnesota’s Top Corn Counties, 1990 & 2007 Production Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
12
Minnesota Corn Prices Received by Growers (monthly, $/bushel) Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
13
Minnesota Corn Utilization Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
14
Minnesota Corn Processing (million bushels) Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2008 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
15
U.S. Ethanol Production Source: Renewable Fuels Association, 2013 $7.20 - $8.60 /bu corn Sept. 2012 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
16
Minnesota: l 1997: 10% ethanol blend; 2005: 2% biodiesel blend l 2013: 20% ethanol blend Source: MDA, 2013 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
17
Source: Agricultural Marketing Services Division, MN Department of Agriculture, 2013 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference Million gallons
18
Minnesota Ethanol Economic Impact YearProduction (Million Gallons)Output Impact ($ million)Employment (# of Jobs) 19901128.51166 19911742.38247 19923589.30520 19933890.96529 199441101.45590 199551115.26671 199669203.511,089 1997112275.661,476 1998124254.381,362 1999190352.471,759 2000220511.482,231 2001252802.603,132 2002300732.242,858 20033591,074.324,008 20044001,476.025,506 20054201,577.005,883 20065502,766.6110,321 2007 (Projected)6203,067.8011,444 2008 (Projected)1,0004,948.6118,461 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
19
GIS uses the power of a computer and specialized software to stack different maps and data layers on top of each other so that they can be compared and analyzed. Data layers used: Minnesota Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) GIS Database; 1997 (pre-ethanol) and 2008 (post-ethanol) Ethanol Biorefinery Locations 2012 (Renewable Fuels Association) 2010 Stream Assessments (MPCA) Lakes from the USGS 1:100,000 Digital Line Graph Hydrography Layer (MDNR) Base imagery from ESRI (Digital Globe, FSA)
20
Initial Observations: Yellow denotes CRP acreage lost between 1997 and 2008 (742 acres) Red denotes CRP acreage gained between 1997 and 2008 (537 acres) within 5 miles of the Central MN Ethanol Coop, Little Falls, MN (Morrison county) 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
21
Closeup of CRP acreage lost between 1997 and 2008, just west of the Little Falls ethanol plant. Note proximity to surface waters. 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
22
Comparison of 1997 and 2008 CRP acres within 0.25 mi. of surface water body or stream (sub-section of Kandiyohi county)
23
2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference Changes to MN CRP acreage within 0.25 mile of assessed streams or lakes between 1997 and 2008.
24
Conclusions CRP enrollment has increased overall between 1997 and 2008 in Minnesota Up to 10% of 1997 CRP acres near water lost by 2008 Corn prices may affect future CRP enrollment decisions 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.