1. Multiple Shape Correspondence by Dynamic Programming Yusuf Sahillioğlu 1 and Yücel Yemez 2 Pacific Graphics 2014 Computer Eng. Depts, 1, 2, Turkey.

2. Goal: Find correspondences between all shapes in the collection:.. Key: Minimize the overall distortion. Naïve algorithm: Pick the min-distortion map between each consecutive pair.. Problem: No guarantee on the overall distortion, i.e., distortions of the maps between non-consecutive pairs, e.g., and, may be very high. Our dynamic programming algorithm addresses this multiple shape correspondence problem. Problem Statement

3. Improved pairwise correspondences to better perform Shape interpolation: Attribute transfer: Shape registration: Shape matching: Statistical shape analysis: Applications

4. Improved pairwise correspondences suggests with a total distortion sum of.061 +.063 +.069 =.193.061 +.065 +.060 =.186.186 <.196 Contributions VS.

5. Contributions An algorithm which explicitly minimizes the overall distortion while enforcing consistency*. Dynamic programming. Novel graph structure. No initial set of maps required. No embedding ambiguities and errors. Close approximation to the optimal solution. Much faster than the alternatives. * A set of maps is consistent iff all cycles of maps yield the identity map.

6. A collection of initially unmatched isometric: or nearly isometric shapes: Scope with arbitrary topology and scaling, as well as potential noise and non-uniform triangulation.

7. Our method is purely isometric. Intrinsic global property. Similar shapes have similar metric structures. Metric: Geodesic distance g. Isometry Isometric distortion of a map between shapes and g g gg g g g g average for A variant of the isometric distortion measures used in Bronstein et al., SISC, 2006. Huang et al., SGP, 2008. Sahillioğlu and Yemez, {PAMI, 2012}, {CGF, 2013}.

8. Same graph used in all multiple shape corresponders so far. Vertices: all shapes. Edges: weighted by the matching cost of the initially assumed pairwise maps. Graph Representation General theme: Replace potentially “bad” maps with compositions of “better” maps. Charpiat, NORDIA’09: Replaces a pairwise map b/w each shape pair by the composition of maps on the shortest path between the two shapes. Nguyen et al., SGP’11: Force all 3-cycles of maps return to identity. Huang et al., SIGGRAPH Asia’12: Cycle consistency plus neighbor-preservation. Huang and Guibas, SGP’13: Cycle consistency as the solution to a semidef. program.

9. We introduce a novel graph. Vertices: maps between shape extremities. Edges: no weighting (no initial maps required). Graph Representation Optimal path finding on this graph to solve our problem. Accumulate & Use distortion info on growing paths via DP.

10. All shapes in the collection: Algorithm

11. Enumerate maps between consecutive shapes as graph vertices: for

12. Create paths from to and store their overall isometric distortions m=1m=2m=3 m=4 m=M-1. Initially (m=1) a path is just a vertex and its distortion is easy to compute:. 3 rd shape in process.Create paths ending at x-marked vertex. Compute each path distortion via dynamic programming: Eq. 6 Save only the highlighted path with min-distortion. Do the same for the next x-marked graph vertex.And the same for another x-marked vertex. 4 th shape in process. Note that existing paths may change, e.g., subpath to top node in is updated. 5 th shape in process. Last shape in process. Output the path with min-distortion: That is, the vertices/maps on this red path.

13. Results Huang et al., SIGGRAPH Asia, 2012. Our method.

14. Different map enumarations, e.g., to produce different types of correspondences. Partially isometric. Non-isometric. Dense (currently we match 300- samples on a high-reso and interpolate to full dense map). Future Work New ways of combining maps other than composition.

15. Rather than improving a given set of initial pairwise maps, explicitly minimize the overall isometric distortion function Isometric distortion minimized in the original 3D Euclidean space wherein isometry is defined, i.e., no embedding. Output: consistent bijections over all pairs of isometric sets. Closely approximates the optimal solution in a fast way. Robust to non-uniform triangulation and noise. No restriction on topology. Conclusion

16. Assoc. Prof. Yücel Yemez, PhD supervisor Yusuf, Asst. Prof. People