Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7"— Presentation transcript:

1 SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7
Course : S Ground Improvement Method Year : 2010 SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7

2 Stabilization Methods:
COURSE 2 Content: Soft Soil Problems Stabilization Methods: Preloading & Vertical Drain Stone Column Dynamic Compaction Chemical Stabilization Reinforcement Bina Nusantara

3 SOFT SOIL PROBLEMS LOW BEARING CAPACITY HIGH SETTLEMENT LIQUEFACTION
Bina Nusantara

4 SOFT SOIL PROBLEMS LOW BEARING CAPACITY Bina Nusantara

5 SOFT SOIL PROBLEMS SETTLEMENT Bina Nusantara

6 SOFT SOIL PROBLEMS LIQUEFACTION Bina Nusantara

7 STABILIZATION METHOD PRELOADING & VERTICAL DRAIN
Encountered problems on fine grained soft soil are low strength, and high compressibility Preloading by surcharge embankment applied to reduce compressibility and increases soil strength Fine grained soil possessed very low permeability that consolidation process takes very long time  Vertical drains provide drainage paths to reach the surface Bina Nusantara

8 PRELOADING & VERTICAL DRAIN
BASIC PRINCIPLE Surcharge Bina Nusantara

9 PRELOADING & VERTICAL DRAIN
BASIC PRINCIPLE Bina Nusantara

10 VERTICAL DRAIN DESIGN Bina Nusantara

11 VERTICAL DRAIN DESIGN D = 1.05 S D = 1.13 S Bina Nusantara

12 VERTICAL DRAIN INSTALLATION
Bina Nusantara

13 VERTICAL DRAIN + VACUUM
Vacuum load can reach greater than 80kPa (equals to 4 – 5 m height preloading fills with g = 17 – 18 kN/m3) Rapidly decreases excess pore water pressure Inward lateral movement Bina Nusantara

14 VACUUM CONSOLIDATION Bina Nusantara

15 CONVENTIONAL VD VS VACUUM CONSOLIDATION
CONVENTIONAL VERTICAL DRAIN VACUUM CONSOLIDATION Bina Nusantara

16 STABILIZATION METHOD VIBRO COMPACTION
Compaction of loose granular soils by penetration of a vibratory probe or vibroflot. Should combine with sand/stone column if applied in fine grained soil Affected area by the compaction energy : m Bina Nusantara

17 STABILIZATION METHOD STONE COLUMN Bina Nusantara

18 STONE COLUMN DESIGN BEARING CAPACITY SINGLE STONE COLUMN
Formula 1  Allowable Bearing Capacity FS = Factor of Safety = 3 Formula 2  Formula 3  Where: v = vertical stress in stone column hs = passive resistance of surrounding soil (the effect of loading shall be considered) v’ = effective friction angle of stone column (35o – 40o) cu = undrained cohesion of surrounding soil PL = Pressuremeter limit presssure Bina Nusantara

19 STONE COLUMN DESIGN Available design methods with respect to settlement: (1) Equilibrium Method (2) Priebe’s Method (3) Granular Wall Method (4) Greenwood Method (5) Incremental Method and (6) Finite Element Method Derived from unit cell idealisation, stone column is modelled to be a concentric body in a composite soil mass. Bina Nusantara

20 STONE COLUMN DESIGN Bina Nusantara

21 STONE COLUMN NOTES Typical design values per column in range of 200 to 300 kN/column Young modulus of stone column in range of 40 to 70 Mpa The settlement of single stone column under design load usually in range of 5 to 10 mm The maximum settlement of sotne column group is 100mm Bina Nusantara

22 STONE COLUMN INSTALLATION
vibrator makes a hole in the weak ground hole backfilled ..and compacted Densely compacted stone column Bina Nusantara

23 STONE COLUMN INSTALLATION
WET METHOD Bina Nusantara

24 STONE COLUMN INSTALLATION
DRY METHOD (TOP-FEED METHOD) Bina Nusantara

25 STONE COLUMN INSTALLATION
DRY METHOD (BOTTOM-FEED METHOD) Bina Nusantara

26 STONE COLUMN INSTALLATION
BOREHOLE METHOD (RAMMED COLUMN) Bina Nusantara

27 VIBROFLOTATION Vibro Compaction Method by using a self vibrating probe or a vibroflot Vibroflot (vibrating unit) Length = 2 – 3 m Diameter = 0.3 – 0.5 m Mass = 2 tonnes Bina Nusantara

28 VIBROFLOTATION Bina Nusantara

29 VIBROFLOTATION INSTALLATION
Bina Nusantara

30 STABILIZATION METHOD DYNAMIC COMPACTION
A method of improving the ground using that involves very high energy waves by hammering the earth Pounders weighing 15 to 40 tons are released in free fall from a height of 10 to 40 m. Most suitable for granular soil Bina Nusantara

31 DYNAMIC COMPACTION Cost effective method for: - sand densification - soil compaction - ground compaction - land fill treatment - unconsolidated fill or soil treatment Bina Nusantara

32 DYNAMIC COMPACTION Bina Nusantara

33 DYNAMIC COMPACTION For design, suitability assessment, and determination of optimum field operation parameters rely mainly on : Empirical Equations Field Pilot Tests Past experiences Bina Nusantara

34 DYNAMIC COMPACTION Bina Nusantara

35 DYNAMIC COMPACTION DESIGN
Effective Depth Improved Bina Nusantara

36 DYNAMIC COMPACTION DESIGN
Applied Energy Bina Nusantara

37 DYNAMIC COMPACTION DESIGN
Design Chart Bina Nusantara

38 DYNAMIC COMPACTION DESIGN
Design Procedure Bina Nusantara

39 DYNAMIC COMPACTION MECHANISM
IN COHESIONLESS SOIL Bina Nusantara

40 DYNAMIC COMPACTION NOTES
Important notes for deep compaction (1) Effective depth will not exceed 15 m in practice (Lukas, 1986). (2) Depth of compaction (D) is proportional to the square root of the impact energy (Metric Ton*Meter) /drop. Different relations have been proposed. D = (W*h)1/2 for cohesive material (Menard and Broise, 1975) D = 0.5 (W*h)1/2 for cohesionless material (Leonards et al., 1980) Actually, D = 0.3~0.7 (W*h)1/2 from field observation. Use a higher value for loose soils. (3) Maximum improvement occurs within a zone between 1/3 to 1/2 the depth of compaction. (4) If a line is attached from the crane to the weight, the efficiency of the energy reduces by 20% (Lukas, 1986). (5) The ground water has to be at least 2 m below existing ground or 0.6 m below the bottom of craters. (6) An area of 5,000 to 10,000 m2 is required to be economical. (7) Vibration and noise (115 to 120 dB at source) may be a concern to the nearby developments. Figure 1.3 shows the estimated vibration velocity due to the compaction (Lukas, 1986). (8) Minimum 34 ~ 50 m clearance from any structure. (9) The number of repeated drop on the same spot should be limited to drops (Lukas, 1986) Bina Nusantara

41 STABILIZATION METHOD CHEMICAL STABILIZATION INJECTION GROUTING
DEEP SOIL MIXING JET GROUTING Bina Nusantara

42 CHEMICAL STABILIZATION
Bina Nusantara

43 INJECTION GROUTING 1. install grout pipes using drilling or driving techniques. 2. The mortar-like grout, injected under certain pressure through the pipes. The grout pipe is then lifted some distance (0.3 to 1.5 m), and the injection process is repeated. 3. Grouting can stiffen and strengthen the soil layer by in creasing its density, and acting as a reinforcement. Grouting may also be used to re-level a structure that has been damaged by differential settlements. Bina Nusantara

44 DEEP SOIL MIXING Soil Mixing is the mechanical blending of the in situ soil with cementitious materials. Strengthen soft and wet cohesive soils in a very short time period Treatment is possible up to depths of 30 m Bina Nusantara

45 DEEP SOIL MIXING Bina Nusantara

46 JET GROUTING Uses high kinetic energy (20-60 MPa) liquid spurt (jet) for chopping up the ground around and mixing it with binding agent. Can be used for treating most soil types Bina Nusantara

47 JET GROUTING TYPES Bina Nusantara

48 JET GROUTING Bina Nusantara

49 CHEMICAL STABILIZATION – RESULT
Bina Nusantara

50 STABILIZATION METHOD REINFORCEMENT Bina Nusantara

51 REINFORCEMENT BASIC PRINCIPLE Bina Nusantara

52 REINFORCEMENT MATERIAL
GEOSYNTHETIC Bina Nusantara


Download ppt "SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google