Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAntonio Harting Modified over 9 years ago
1
May 2013 Mass Report Generation Managing High Volume Reporting
2
Overview of Volume Output Requirements Common Problems Report Resolution Demonstration Overview of Volume Output Requirements Common Problems Report Resolution Demonstration Agenda
3
In 2012 the WorleyParsons Environmental Data Management Team processed: 6,500 lab EDDs, From 4 primary laboratories, accounting for 28,000 samples, and 1,436,000 results, Into 3 databases containing 3,000 facilities across Canada Overview of Volume
4
Common data table and graph outputs are displayed: Historically, year over year With guidelines (action levels) comparisons applied Grouped by analytes From scratch on a regular basis (i.e. quarterly) Output Requirements Table 7 of 8, Page 105 of 132 for 1 of 11 sites Graphing sheet 3 of 800
5
Staffing: It takes ~6 months for staff to get up to speed After 2.5 years they are burnt out Timing: We have several programs that require reporting to be in the clients hand within 24 hours of sample drop off Laboratory issues: Inaccurate or incomplete reporting Reporting what we want, not what we need Labs sign reports, not data System Issues: An x86 32 bit machine has a 2 GB memory limit Large data sets using a modified EQuIS report are time consuming, taking over 45 minutes to run Cross tab display uses 5mb/second Exporting to Excel 20mb/sec Common Problems Does anyone have an analyte group that looks like this? One analyte, multiple methods.
6
In EQuIS 5.6 EarthSoft introduced a new Beta analytical report Allows for a new approach to reporting, using dynamic SQL Combined with a modified lab reporting methodology WorleyParsons has been able to reduce reporting times significantly Core features include: Significant time and memory reduction −47,000 record report (pulled in 23 seconds) −cross-tabbed to 5,785 (37 seconds) −with guidelines applied (41 seconds) −Similar data pulled in standard EQuIS report without guideline comparison and no-cross tab (90 seconds) Simplified analytical grouping Auto Cross-Tab functionality without significant memory loss Direct Guideline (Action Level) comparison Location Specific Guideline Comparison Direct Web GIS Interfacing Report Resolution
7
Demonstration (Standard Analytical Report) Pick Selection
8
Analytical Report Applied to Web GIS Analytical Report Pick Interface Web GIS Report Results
9
Thank you.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.