1. Civil Liberties and the 1 st Amendment

2. The Bill of Rights and the State Barron v. Baltimore (1833) Barron v. Baltimore (1833) – While the Bill of Rights protected the people from the national government -- not state governments. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) – “No State Shall …” Slaughter House Cases (1873) Slaughter House Cases (1873) – Privileges and immunities clause Incorporation Theory Incorporation Theory – Selective v. Total

3. Religion Establishment : “ Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion.” Establishment : “ Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion.” Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) – Activity must: 1. Have a secular, nonreligious purpose; 2. Neither advance a religion nor discourage the practice of religion; 3. avoid “excessive government entanglement with religion” Free Exercise: No law “Prohibiting the free exercise of religion” Free Exercise: No law “Prohibiting the free exercise of religion” – Government can regulate when practices are incongruent with public policy What's Allowed: What's Allowed: – Use of the Bible for secular study – religious student organizations (funding) – Student prayer and religious study – Teacher bible study – Opening prayers for public meetings

5. Current Issues Can a religious organization be sued for employment discrimination? Can a religious organization be sued for employment discrimination? – Hosanna-Tabor vs. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: ministerial exception Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment bar suits brought on behalf of ministers against their churches, claiming termination in violation of employment discrimination laws Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment bar suits brought on behalf of ministers against their churches, claiming termination in violation of employment discrimination laws Can a religious organization be compelled to provide services they consider morally offensive? Can a religious organization be compelled to provide services they consider morally offensive? – “Obamacare” contraception mandate --7 States suing over the rule all insurers will be required to provide "preventive health services." all insurers will be required to provide "preventive health services." A religious employer who objects to treatment aimed at prevention of pregnancy may leave it out provided: (1) It has religious inculcation as its primary duty; (2) It primarily employs people of the same faith; and (3) It primarily serves people of the same faith A religious employer who objects to treatment aimed at prevention of pregnancy may leave it out provided: (1) It has religious inculcation as its primary duty; (2) It primarily employs people of the same faith; and (3) It primarily serves people of the same faith Religious leaders and political opponents argue its a unconst. intrusion Religious leaders and political opponents argue its a unconst. intrusion

6. Freedom of Assembly Free assembly as important as free press and free speech Free assembly as important as free press and free speech – Freedom of assembly includes the right to parade and hold demonstrations in public places, – Must get a permit. – May be limited. – Demonstrations are not allowed on private property – interferes with property rights

7. Free Press vs. Prior restraint Government censorship of information before it is published Government censorship of information before it is published – Near v. Minnesota (1931) – Gangsters and Grafters MN law prohibited publication of “Malicious, scandalous, or defamatory” info MN law prohibited publication of “Malicious, scandalous, or defamatory” info Court ruled 5-4 that law must be voided because it involved prior restraint Court ruled 5-4 that law must be voided because it involved prior restraint – Pentagon Papers: NYT Co. v. U.S. (1971) – Credibility Gap DOE official leaked documents, some secret, revealing gov’t lies about Vietnam DOE official leaked documents, some secret, revealing gov’t lies about Vietnam Court ruled in favor of publication 6-3 … emphasized the need to bar the gov’t from hiding embarrassing and harmful info Court ruled in favor of publication 6-3 … emphasized the need to bar the gov’t from hiding embarrassing and harmful info Government may use prior restraint if in the interest of national security Government may use prior restraint if in the interest of national security

8. Free Press Issues The Founders viewed the press strictly as printed material; electronic media had not yet been invented. The Founders viewed the press strictly as printed material; electronic media had not yet been invented. – Radio and television less protected than press media Natural conflict between 1st and 6th Amendments Natural conflict between 1st and 6th Amendments – “Court of public opinion” FCC regulates radio and television. FCC regulates radio and television. – Cannot censor broadcasts but may set standards. – Movies and the Internet are protected by free press guarantees. – Communities may regulate obscenity within acceptable limits Refusal to display, sell, or screen material is legal Refusal to display, sell, or screen material is legal Advertising receives less protection than political speech. Advertising receives less protection than political speech. – commercial speech trumped by protection of the public

9. How do these view differ on flag burning?

10. Should Burning the American Flag be Legal?

11. What reasonable consequences might one face for their expression

12. Freedom of Expression Types of Expression: Types of Expression: – Pure speech: spoken word, verbal expression – Symbolic speech: expressive action – Seditious Speech: challenges authority – Defamatory speech: false speech Slander: spoken Slander: spoken Libel: written Libel: written – Obscenity: offensive speech – Commercial Speech – Political Speech

13. Landmark Cases

15. Is it reasonable to expect privacy on social networking sites?

16. Should allowing access to your Facebook account be a condition of employment?

17. Right to Privacy? Constitutional Right? Constitutional Right? – Not Enumerated: 1 st, 3 rd, 4 th, 5 th, and 9 th Amendment 1 st, 3 rd, 4 th, 5 th, and 9 th Amendment Griswold and Roe Griswold and Roe – Katz 4 th protects people not places 4 th protects people not places Dissent: 4 th refers to tangible items Dissent: 4 th refers to tangible items

18. Cases Olmstead v. US (1929) Olmstead v. US (1929) – Eavesdropping in public area Katz v. U.S. (1967) Katz v. U.S. (1967) – Expectation of privacy in public (people not places) Griswold v. Conn. (1965) Griswold v. Conn. (1965) – Use of contraception (consenting adults in the home) Roe v. Wade (1973) Roe v. Wade (1973) – Right to abortion protected Ouinlan (1976) & Cruzan (1990) cases Ouinlan (1976) & Cruzan (1990) cases – Right to refuse treatment, must have “clear and convincing evidence” it was their wish Washington v. Glucksburg (1997) Washington v. Glucksburg (1997) – No right to suicide Lawrence v. Texas (2003) Lawrence v. Texas (2003) – Sodomy laws unconstitutional (consenting adults in the home) Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) – Legality of physician assisted suicide left to states