1. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Unemployment by Area

6. Educational attainment Apr. 2010 Feb. 2011Mar. 2011Apr. 2011 Less than a high school diploma Employment- population ratio 39.439.239.838.9 Unemployment rate14.713.913.714.6 High school graduates Employment- population ratio 55.854.654.454.6 Unemployment rate10.59.5 9.7 Some college or associate degree Employment- population ratio 65.164.164.664.5 Unemployment rate8.37.87.47.5 Bachelor's degree and higher(2)2 Employment- population ratio 73.573.673.5 Unemployment rate4.84.34.44.5 Bureau of Labor Statistics – Unemployment by Educational Attainment

7. “While indicators of spending and production have been encouraging on balance, the job market has improved only slowly. Following the loss of about 8-3/4 million jobs from 2008 through 2009, private-sector employment expanded by a little more than 1 million in 2010. However, this gain was barely sufficient to accommodate the inflow of recent graduates and other new entrants to the labor force and, therefore, not enough to significantly erode the wide margin of slack that remains in our labor market…. Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established. “ -Chairman Bernanke, February 2011 Labor Market is crucial to economic recovery

8. “Soaring unemployment has poured salt into a long-festering economic wound - the widening gap between rich and poor Americans, a trend that has been accompanied by a hollowing out of the middle class.” -San Francisco Chronicle, September 26, 2010 "We have got to address this inequality, or it will derail the economy," -Robert Reich, Former Secretary of Labor

9. $160,000 $16,500

11. Juhn, Murphy and Pierce, “Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill”

12. Autor, Figures 1 and 2 Low-end and High-end occupations grew relative to middle occupations High-end wages grew relative to middle-end wages

13. W Number workers LS LD Min W

14. Supply Side – Changes in Labor Force Size and Composition Increasing educational attainment Participation among women Declining participation among male minorities Growth in immigrant population If changes are spread evenly across occupation or wage distribution, these supply effects could not drive polarization.

15. Long-term Trends in Labor Market Participation for Men and Women

16. Long-term Trends in the Distribution of Earnings for Men and Women

17. Changes in Labor Force Participation among Men

18. Long-term Trends in Immigration: Educational Composition

19. W Number workers LS LD W* Wages and employment go in opposite direction

20. Demand Side Hypotheses for Labor Market Polarization Technological change Offshoring/Change in industrial structure International trade

21. Increasing returns to education

22. Autor, Figure 3

23. Institutions Hypotheses for Labor Market Polarization Minimum Wage Unionization

24. Min W falling

26. Atkinson, Picketty and Saez (2011)

32. Washington Post op-ed Economic redistribution can meet some basic needs. We provide food stamps to relieve hunger or vouchers to make housing more affordable. But social equality is not achieved through redistributing cash. "Our research," argue Isabel Sawhill and Ron Haskins of the Brookings Institution, "shows that if you want to avoid poverty and join the middle class in the United States, you need to complete high school (at a minimum), work full time and marry before you have children. If you do all three, your chances of being poor fall from 12 percent to 2 percent."Isabel Sawhill and Ron Haskins of the Brookings Institution So the main reasons for inequality are failing schools, depressed and dysfunctional communities and fragmented families. For the most part, inequality does not result from a lack of consumption by the poor but from a lack of social capital and opportunity. Addressing these challenges is more complex than fiddling with the top tax rate. Economic inequality can be justified as the reward for greater effort - so long as there is also social mobility. In the absence of mobility, capitalism becomes a caste system.

33. Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor under Clinton: Between 2002 and 2007, the bottom 99 percent of incomes grew 1.3 percent a year in real terms, while the incomes of the top 1 percent grew 10 percent a year. During these years, the top 1 percent accounted for two-thirds of all income growth. Over the past three decades, the top 1 percent's share of national income has more than doubled. So there's no reason the top 1 percent should continue to get the Bush tax cut. The top 1 percent spends a much smaller proportion of their income than everyone else. That means there's very little economic stimulus at these lofty heights. … Inequality continues to widen in America. But an especially wide chasm has opened between the upper- middle class - including lawyers, doctors and small-business owners - who earn up to $500,000 a year, and the truly privileged who now occupy top perches in executive suites and on Wall Street, and who pull in millions if not billions. The political power of this top 1 percent is evident in everything from hedge-fund and private-equity- fund managers, who can treat their incomes as capital gains (subject to a 15 percent tax), to multimillion-dollar home-interest deductions on executive mansions. "We have got to address this inequality, or it will derail the economy,”

34. Educational attainment Not seasonally adjustedSeasonally adjusted Apr. 2010 Mar. 2011 Apr. 2011 Apr. 2010 Dec. 2010 Jan. 2011 Feb. 2011 Mar. 2011 Apr. 2011 Less than a high school diploma Civilian labor force 12,22511,56511,70312,07911,75811,38311,31711,65211,567 Participation rate 46.845.746.146.246.045.145.546.145.5 Employed10,4479,80910,00010,3039,9639,7709,74910,0599,876 Employment- population ratio 40.038.839.4 39.038.739.239.838.9 Unemployed1,7781,7561,7031,7761,7951,6131,5681,5931,691 Unemployme nt rate 14.515.214.514.715.314.213.913.714.6 High school graduates, no college(1)1 Civilian labor force 38,77937,54137,48538,85438,20337,51337,52537,17137,506 Participation rate 62.360.660.462.460.960.3 60.060.4 Employed34,72333,60433,88634,76334,46533,97233,96533,65433,881 Employment- population ratio 55.854.354.655.854.954.6 54.454.6 Unemployed4,0563,9373,5994,0913,7383,5413,5603,5173,626 Unemployme nt rate 10.5 9.610.59.89.49.5 9.7 Some college or associate degree Civilian labor force 36,54736,51936,46336,65036,80936,84136,78436,65336,637 Participation rate 70.869.569.371.070.2 69.569.7 Employed33,59033,70833,82933,62533,82133,87833,91933,93833,907 Employment- population ratio 65.164.164.365.164.564.664.164.664.5 Unemployed2,9572,8112,6343,0252,9882,9632,8652,7152,730 Unemployme nt rate 8.17.77.28.38.18.07.87.47.5 Bachelor's degree and higher(2)2 Civilian labor force 45,79446,97946,91345,83946,31246,26346,59146,91946,897 Participation rate 77.277.0 77.276.976.476.9 77.0 Employed43,77844,94344,97643,64144,09544,32244,58844,84344,789 Employment- population ratio 73.873.673.873.573.2 73.673.5 Unemployed2,0152,0361,9372,1982,2171,9412,0032,0762,109 Unemployme nt rate 4.44.34.14.8 4.24.34.44.5 Footnotes (1) Includes persons with a high school diploma or equivalent. (2) Includes persons with bachelor's, master's, professional, and doctoral degrees. NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.