Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTyson Stanford Modified over 9 years ago
2
Nonsocial Social
3
Nonsocial groups: Social facilitation—do better on easy tasks and worse on hard tasks For children winding fishing wire (Triplett, 1897) Adults doing various tasks And even cockroaches Why? Arousal Evaluation apprehension Distraction
5
Social loafing—put in less effort for group tasks Ringelmann, 1880 Over 150 tasks Women and Asians tend to do less, at least on easier tasks BUT People think they are doing as much or more as when they are alone
6
Sat participant in a group of 6 people… Blindfolded participant and had them put on headphones Played clapping or shouting over headphones I.V. thought they were making noise alone or with 5 others Results: 1/3 less noise when they thought others were also making noise
7
Brainstorming 1. The more ideas better 2. the wilder and more creative the better 3. listen, improve, and combine 4. don't be critical of self or others Come up with ideas to improve KNU
8
Evaluation apprehension Social loafing Productivity blocking Category activation
9
Reasons “Debate” instructions—do criticize—seems to work better Brainstorming alone and then together can also work Electronic brainstorming
10
Cohesive groups do better on tasks that require a lot of cooperation Doing well or being less diverse can make groups more cohesive BUT Cohesion can cause elements of groupthink
11
When retaining group solidarity becomes more important than getting the right answer Group is highly cohesive Group is isolated from outside points of view There is a directive leader There is high stress There are poor decision making procedures http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/FIS/Courses/LIS2 149/Groupthink.html http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/FIS/Courses/LIS2 149/Groupthink.html
12
Groups are less likely to listen to outside influences than are individuals (reading for today).
13
Leader should be impartial Group should seek outside opinions Create small groups then come back together Get opinions anonymously
14
Diverse groups can be good because more people have different types of information BUT people tend not to share unique information in group discussions People focus on the information that they all know in the discussions, leading to poorer decisions
15
Wendy is a college senior planning her graduate work in chemistry. She has been admitted to a university that has very rigorous standards of excellence so that only a fraction of the students succeed in getting their PhD’s. She could also go to a school with a lesser reputation but where most students succeed. What is the LOWEST probability Wendy should accept of getting a degree before deciding to go to school at Cal Tech, the top university? 1 in 106 in 10 2 in 107 in 10 3 in 108 in 10 4 in 109 in 10 5 in 1010 in 10
16
No, groups tend to come up with more extreme opinions than individuals do Why? Social comparison—want to be like others Persuasive arguments—people talk more about shared information May happen even more now that it’s easier to seek out confirming information
17
What would you do if you could be invisible for a day? Deindividuation can make people feel less personally responsible. Zimbardo prison study example: http://www.prisonexp.org/ http://www.prisonexp.org/ People become more obedient to group norms So, it depends on the norm. Wearing disguises vs. nurse uniforms What about the internet?
18
Transactive memory—the memory of groups is better than that of individuals
19
Personality doesn’t seem to affect much (other than being tall) Leaders can be task or relationship oriented Which is better depends on type of task and relationship between group and with leader Transformational leaders
20
Over 17,000 managers in 62 countries 2 seemed to be important across countries Charisma Team-orientation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.