Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

James A. Shifflett Dissertation Presentation For Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Washington University in St. Louis April 22, 2008 Chairperson:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "James A. Shifflett Dissertation Presentation For Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Washington University in St. Louis April 22, 2008 Chairperson:"— Presentation transcript:

1 James A. Shifflett Dissertation Presentation For Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Washington University in St. Louis April 22, 2008 Chairperson: Professor Clifford M. Will Extensions of the Einstein-Schrodinger Non-Symmetric Theory of Gravity

2 Einstein-Maxwell theory  -renormalized Einstein-Schrodinger (LRES) theory - Lagrangian - Field equations Exact solutions - Electric monopole - Electromagnetic plane-wave Equations of motion - Lorentz force equation - Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman method Observational consequences - Pericenter advance - Deflection of light - Time delay of light - Shift in Hydrogen atom energy levels Application of Newman-Penrose methods - Asymptotically flat 1/r expansion of the field equations LRES theory for non-Abelian fields Conclusions Overview

3 Greek indices ,, ,  etc. always go from 0…3 Geometrized units: c=G=1 Some conventions Einstein summation convention: paired indices imply summation comma=derivative, [ ]=antisymmetrization, ( )=symmetrization,

4 Einstein-Maxwell theory

5 The fundamental fields of Einstein-Maxwell theory The electromagnetic vector potential A  is the fundamental field Electric and magnetic fields (E and B) are defined in terms of A 

6 The fundamental fields of Einstein-Maxwell theory Metric determines distance between points in space-time dx 1 dx 2 Connection determines how vectors change when moved  dx  r 2D radial coordinates (x 1,x 2 )=(r,  ) generalized Pythagorean theorem (ds) 2 =(dx 1 ) 2 +(dx 2 ) 2

7 Almost all field theories can be derived from a Lagrangian The field equations are derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations which minimizes the “action” Lagrangian is also necessary for quantization via path integral methods. Guarantees field equations are coordinate independent and self consistent

8 Einstein-Maxwell theory = General Relativity + Electromagnetism Lorentz-force equation Einstein equations

9 Early attempts to unify General Relativity and Electromagnetism

10  -renormalized Einstein-Schrodinger (LRES) theory

11 LRES theory vs. Einstein-Maxwell theory

12 Einstein-Schrödinger theory is non-symmetric generalization of vacuum GR LRES theory basically includes a  z term in the ES theory Lagrangian - gives the same Lorentz force equation as in Einstein-Maxwell theory  z term might be expected to occur as a 0th order quantization effect - zero-point fluctuations are essential to Standard Model and QED - demonstrated by Casimir force and other effects  =  b +  z resembles mass/charge/field-strength renormalization in QED - “physical” mass of an electron is sum of “bare” mass and “self energy” - a “physical”  is needed to represent dark energy! Non-Abelian LRES theory requires –  z ≈  b ≈ 10 63 cm -2 ~ 1/(Planck length) 2 - this is what would be expected if  z was caused by zero-point fluctuations  z term could also result from the minimum of the potential of some additional scalar field in the theory, like the Weinberg-Salam  field  z modification is a new idea, particularly the non-Abelian version LRES theory is well motivated

13 The field equations Ampere’s law is identical to Einstein-Maxwell theory The electromagnetic field tensor f  can be defined by Other field equations have tiny extra terms

14 Exact Solutions

15 Exact charged black hole solution of Einstein-Maxwell theory Called the Reissner-Nordström solution Becomes Schwarzschild solution for q=0 -2M/r term is what causes gravitational force

16 Exact charged black hole solution of LRES theory The charged solution is very close to the Reissner-Nordström solution, Extra terms are tiny for worst-case radii accessible to measurement:

17 Charged solution of Einstein-Maxwell theory vs. LRES theory LRES Einstein-Maxwell Event horizon conceals interior (disappears for Q>M as is the case for elementary particles) r+r+ r-r- r+r+ r-r-

18 EM plane wave solution is identical to that of Einstein-Maxwell theory Exact Electromagnetic Plane Wave Solution of LRES theory

19 Equations of Motion

20 Lorentz force equation is identical to that of Einstein-Maxwell theory Usual Lorentz force equation results from divergence of Einstein equations +q/r 2 -q/r 2 +q/r 2 Lorentz force equation in 4D form Also includes gravitational “force”; it becomes geodesic equation when q=0

21 Requires no sources (no in the Lagrangian) LRES theory and Einstein-Maxwell theory are both non-linear so two stationary charged solutions summed together is not a solution EIH method finds approximate two-particle solutions for g ,    and A  Motion of the particles agrees with the Lorentz force equation q/r 2 Lorentz force also results from Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman (EIH) method

22 Observable Consequences

23 M 1, Q 1 M 2, Q 2 Pericenter Advance Kepler’s third law This ignores radiation reaction Einstein-Maxwell theory LRES theory modification Comparison to Einstein-Maxwell theory extremal charged black hole Q=M=M sun, r=4M atomic parameters Q 1 =-Q 2 =e, M=M P, r=a 0 fractional difference10 -75 10 -85

24 Deflection of Light photon M, Q  Einstein-Maxwell theory LRES theory modification Comparison to Einstein-Maxwell theory extremal charged black hole Q=M=M sun, r=4M atomic parameters Q=e, M=M P, r=a 0 fractional difference10 -76 10 -54

25 Time Delay of Light radio signal M, Q t=d/c+  t t=0 satellite –(–( )–)– Einstein-Maxwell theory LRES theory modification d Comparison to Einstein-Maxwell theory extremal charged black hole Q=M=M sun, r=4M atomic parameters Q=e, M=M P, r=a 0 fractional difference10 -75 10 -55

26 may contain all of the Standard Model (excluding F  F  term) Shift in Hydrogen Atom Energy Levels

27 Application of Newman Penrose Methods

28 1/r expansion shows that: a) LRES theory has no continuous wave Proca solutions like  τ ≈sin(kr-  t)/r b) LRES theory = Einstein-Maxwell theory to O(1/r 2 ) for k=  propagation 1/r expansion may not necessarily rule out wave-packet Proca solutions. Perhaps a Proca field with M/ħ~1/L P could be a built-in Pauli-Villars field? Asympotically flat 1/r expansion of the field equations

29 Non-Abelian LRES theory

30 Non-Abelian LRES theory vs. Einstein-Weinberg-Salam theory

31 The non-Abelian field equations Ampere’s law is identical to Weinberg-Salam theory The electro-weak field tensor f  is defined by Other field equations have tiny extra terms

32 L  L under SU(2) gauge transformation, with 2x2 matrix U L  L under U(1) gauge transformation, with scalar  L*=L when A and f  are Hermitian

33 For the details see Refereed Publications “A modification of Einstein-Schrodinger theory that contains both general relativity and electrodynamics”, General Relativity and Gravitation (Online First), Jan. 2008, gr-qc/0801.2307. Additional Archived Papers “A modification of Einstein-Schrodinger theory which closely approximates Einstein-Weinberg-Salam theory”, Apr. 2008, gr-qc/0804.1962 “Lambda-renormalized Einstein-Schrodinger theory with spin-0 and spin-1/2 sources”, Apr. 2007, gr-qc/0411016. “Einstein-Schrodinger theory in the presence of zero-point fluctuations”, Apr. 2007, gr-qc/0310124. “Einstein-Schrodinger theory using Newman-Penrose tetrad formalism”, Jul. 2005, gr-qc/0403052. Other material on http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jashiffl/index.html Check of the electric monopole solution (MAPLE) Check of the electromagnetic plane-wave solution (MAPLE) Asymptotically flat Newman-Penrose 1/r expansion (REDUCE)

34 Why pursue LRES theory? It unifies gravitation and electro-weak theory in a classical sense It is vacuum GR generalized to non-symmetric fields and Hermitian matrix components, with a well motivated  z modification It suggests untried approaches to a complete unified field theory - Higher dimensions, but with LRES theory instead of vacuum GR? - Larger matrices: U(1)xSU(5) instead of U(1)xSU(2)?

35 Conclusion: Non-Abelian LRES theory ≈ Einstein-Weinberg-Salam Charged solution and Reissner-Nordström sol. have tiny fractional difference: 10 -73 for extremal charged black hole; 10 -61 for atomic charges/masses/radii. Standard tests extremal charged black holeatomic charges/masses/radii pericenter advance 10 -75 10 -85 deflection of light 10 -76 10 -54 time delay of light 10 -75 10 -55 Other Standard Model fields included like Einstein-Weinberg-Salam theory: - Energy levels of Hydrogen atom have fractional difference of <10 -49. fractional difference from Einstein-Maxwell result Extra terms in the field equations are <10 -13 of usual terms. Lorentz force equation is identical to that of Einstein-Maxwell theory EM plane-wave solution is identical to that of Einstein-Maxwell theory.

36 Backup charts

37 The non-Abelian/non-symmetric Ricci tensor We use one of many non-symmetric generalizations of the Ricci tensor Because it has special transformation properties For Abelian fields the third and fourth terms are the same

38 Proca waves as Pauli-Villars ghosts? For the Standard Model this difference is about 60 Non-Abelian LRES theory works for d  d matrices as well as 2  2 matrices Maybe 4πsin 2  w /  or its “bare” value at  c works out correctly for some “d” SU(5) almost unifies Standard Model, how about U(1)xSU(5)? If wave-packet Proca waves exist and if they have negative energy, perhaps the Proca field functions as a built-in Pauli-Villars ghost

39 Electron Self Energy  mass renormalization m = m b - m b ·ln(ћω c /mc 2 )3  /2  Photon Self Energy (vacuum polarization)  charge renormalization e = e b - e b ·ln(M/m)  /3  Zero-Point Energy (vacuum energy density)  cosmological constant renormalization  =  b - L P 2  c 4 (fermions-bosons)/2   c = (cutoff frequency) L P = (Planck length) M= (Pauli-Villars cutoff mass)  = (fine structure constant)  e-e-  e+e+ e-e-   e-e- e-e-  =  b +  z is similar to mass/charge renormalization in QED


Download ppt "James A. Shifflett Dissertation Presentation For Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Washington University in St. Louis April 22, 2008 Chairperson:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google