Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses 01-19-11.

Published byAnne Siddens Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses 01-19-11."— Presentation transcript:

1 NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses 01-19-11

2 Steady-State Maxwell EM Analysis: PF and TF Coil Loads: Current Scenario #79 with 10% Headroom

3 ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil Assembly Exported to Maxwell

4 ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil Assembly Exported to Maxwell (2)

5 Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure

6 Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Y-Z Plane Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Maxwell and Opera Field Results Agree within 3%

7 Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Coil Surfaces Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

8 Maxwell Results: Magnetic Flux Density on Coil Surfaces(2) Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

9 Maxwell Results: Current Density on Coil Surfaces Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

10 ANSYS WB Full Model Mesh Hex Dominant Mesh Element Size = 5 cm # Nodes = 685908 # Elements = 131969

11 TF Outer Leg OOP Torque and Force, Fixed Ends, No Clevis Load Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom TF OOP Torque = 1.271E06 ft-lbf TF OOP Force = 12 x 24,103 lbf = 2.892E05 lbf

12 TF Inner Leg OOP Torque, OOP Force/ Flag: Fixed Ends Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom OOP Torque = 9.99E04 ft-lbf OOP Force/Flag = 9.99E04 ft-lbf/ (1 ft x 36) = 2.775E03 lbf

13 Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: Half Plane TF OOP Torque Current Scenario #79w/ Headroom

14 Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF1AU Vertical Force Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

15 Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF2U Vertical Force Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

16 Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF3U Vertical Force Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

17 Maxwell/ANSYS WB EM Generated Loads: PF5U Vertical Force Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom

18 Transient Maxwell EM Analysis: Vacuum Vessel Disruption Load: Centered-Plasma Disruption Scenario

19 For the current quench mode, five cases shall be assessed by simulating the linear decay of current at the rate specified for the five locations. For the VDE/Halo mode, four cases shall be assessed. In each case the current in the centered plasma shall be decreased as indicated while the current in the offset plasma shall be increased as indicated to simulate plasma motion. Forces due to induced currents shall be added to forces due to halo currents.

20 ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil and VV w/ Ports Exported to Maxwell

21 Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure: w/ Ports

22 Maxwell Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports Mesh: VV Mesh Settings: Element Length = 3 cm, Faceting Angle = 5 degrees # Elements = 3.32E06

23 Magnetic Flux Density on Y-Z Plane: VV w/ Ports: End of Quench Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Maxwell and Opera Field Results Agree within 3%

24 Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: Start of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

25 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: Start of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

26 Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

27 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

28 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/ Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

29 ANSYS DM Solid Model: Vacuum Vessel w/ Port Extensions

30 ANSYS WB Static Structural Model w/ Ports: Mesh VV Mesh Settings: Automatic Sweep, # Div. = 3; Element Size = 2 cm; No Mid-side Nodes # Nodes = 312928 # Elements = 273458

31 ANSYS Static Structural Model: Loads and Boundary Conditions Fixed Face Face Radial Displacement = 0 OOP Torque = 2.85E06 ft-lbf Pressure =14.7 psi

32 ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: Force Density 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Force Anomalies Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

33 ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

34 ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress (2) 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

35 ANSYS Static Structural Results w/ Port Extensions: von Mises Stress (3) 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Results for 2/3 Required Maxwell Mesh Density

36 ANSYS WB Solid Model of Simplified Coil and VV Exported to Maxwell

37 Maxwell Solid Model with Vacuum Enclosure: w/o Ports

38 Maxwell Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports Mesh: VV Mesh Settings: Element Length = 2 cm, Faceting Angle = 1 degree # Elements = 2.50E06

39 Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: Start of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

40 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: Start of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

41 Magnetic Flux Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

42 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

43 Eddy Current Density on Vacuum Vessel w/o Ports: End of Quench 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

44 ANSYS Static Structural Results, Ports excluded from EM Solution: Force Density 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

45 Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: von Mises Stress 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

46 Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: von Mises Stress (2) 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field

47 Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: Margin of Safety 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Factor of Safety = 1.0 Max. Stress = 26,000 psi

48 Static Structural Results, Ports Excluded from EM Solution: Margin of Safety (2) 1ms Centered-Plasma Disruption: Current Scenario #79 w/ Headroom Background Field Factor of Safety = 1.0 Max. Stress = 26,000 psi

49 1st

Download ppt "NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses 01-19-11."

Similar presentations

FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.

FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4.

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components Model includes bracket conducting path on back of PPs Disruption cases: Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms)

Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components Model includes bracket conducting path on back of PPs Disruption cases: Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms)
WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.

WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.

ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Two questions: (1) How to find the force, F on the electric charge, Q excreted by the field E and/or B? (2) How fields E and/or B can be created? Gauss’s.

Two questions: (1) How to find the force, F on the electric charge, Q excreted by the field E and/or B? (2) How fields E and/or B can be created? Gauss’s.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.

Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
EMA 405 3-D Elements. Introduction 3-D elements have 3 degrees of freedom per node (u x, u y, u z ) The two fundamental shapes are hexahedral and tetrahedral.

EMA D Elements. Introduction 3-D elements have 3 degrees of freedom per node (u x, u y, u z ) The two fundamental shapes are hexahedral and tetrahedral.
Linear Buckling Workshop 7. Workshop Supplement Linear Buckling August 26, 2005 Inventory #002266 WS7-2 Workshop 7 - Goals The goal in this workshop is.

Linear Buckling Workshop 7. Workshop Supplement Linear Buckling August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS7-2 Workshop 7 - Goals The goal in this workshop is.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review

Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Abstract/Objectives Better understand the effects of typical GD&T variations on Bolt Stresses in Torque Carrying Bolted Flanges Create Trend Curves for.

Abstract/Objectives Better understand the effects of typical GD&T variations on Bolt Stresses in Torque Carrying Bolted Flanges Create Trend Curves for.
AT Pilot Plant EM and Structural Studies P. Titus.

AT Pilot Plant EM and Structural Studies P. Titus.
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method

Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
J.Cugnoni, LMAF-EPFL, 2014.  Stress based criteria (like Von Mises) usually define the onset of “damage” initiation in the material  Once critical stress.

J.Cugnoni, LMAF-EPFL,  Stress based criteria (like Von Mises) usually define the onset of “damage” initiation in the material  Once critical stress.
Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.

Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Brainstorming on Design Solutions for TF Joint C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.

NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Brainstorming on Design Solutions for TF Joint C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.

Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google