Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Homology Based Analysis of the Human/Mouse lncRNome

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Homology Based Analysis of the Human/Mouse lncRNome"— Presentation transcript:

1 Homology Based Analysis of the Human/Mouse lncRNome
Cédric Notredame Giovanni Bussotti Comparative Bioinformics lab CRG

2 Part 1: GENCODE v10 lncRNA screening vs human and mouse genomes
Strategy: PipeR one2many homolog assignment Template: PipeR Parameters: Blast - Freyhult parametrization - Lower case masking - Low complexity masking Exonerate - est2genome model - 70% coverage required - seed extension 2X (the span of the genomic size of the query on both sides) genes 10840 transcripts 17547 exons 58857 sum of mature transcript length (nt) 16·927·027 real coverage (nt) 13·083·478 non overlapping loci 7428

3 PipeR: a pipeline for mapping lncRNAs
blast-exonerate based framework to map lncRNAs against target genomes algorithm used: chromosome 2 Blast hits mapping extension Exonerate spliced transcript lncRNA

4 PipeR: lncRNA Homology Mapping
GENECODE lncRNAs Vs Complete Genomes PipeR: lncRNA Homology Mapping Anchor points: ENCODE vs Mouse with tuned Blast Extension: Exonerate Filtering: Id and Coverage Validation of the GFF annotation Overlap with Annotation Overlap with Cufflink Models RPKM on target genome Further Mapping Parameter Space Exploration using Experimental Evidences GFF File Notredame, Bussotti

5 Mapping overview Query species Multiple Homologues Target species
Gene A Gene B Query species Transcript 1 Transcript 3 Transcript 2 Multiple Homologues Blast/Exonerate failed Homolog 1 Homolog 2 Homolog 3 Homolog 4 Best reciprocal Conserved exon number High repeat coverage Overlap with protein Target species

6 GENCODEv10 vs human genome
mapped transcripts out of 17547 many lncRNAs found in multiple copies (lncRNA families) - found homologs corresponding to exons Annotations of discovered homologs are readily available

7 Homolog repeat coverage
About the 10% of all our homolog predictions are fully covered by repeats

8 Homolog repeat coverage
We could sub-group the homologs in 3 set according with the repeat coverage: <= 20 < = 80 < = 100

9 Mapping statistics HUMAN <= 20% <= 80% <= 100%
genV10 mapped genes 6088 10425 10698 genV10 mapped transcripts 9318 16856 17327 Total homologs 35399 102250 144566 Homologs whose exons overlap protein coding exons (same strand) 3621 5076 8988 HUMAN

10 GENCODEv10 vs mouse genome
mapped 3190 transcripts out of 17547 representing 2249 human genes many lncRNAs found in multiple copies (lncRNA families) - found homologs corresponding to exons Annotations of discovered homologs are readily available

11 Exon Number Conservation
Human/Mouse Exon Number Conservation Difference between the number of exons in the human transcripts and in the mouse homologs “0” means that the exon number is the same Negative bins indicate mouse homologs having more exons than the human query 1160 GENCODE v10 transcripts find at least 1 homolog in mouse with the same exon number human < mouse human > mouse

12 Homolog repeat coverage
We could sub-group the homologs in 3 set according with the repeat coverage: <= 20 < = 80 < = 100

13 Mapping statistics MOUSE <= 20% <= 80% <= 100%
Reciprocal homologs genV10 mapped genes 1867 2172 2249 1445 genV10 mapped transcripts 2586 3076 3190 1966 Total homologs 6108 11141 14936 Homologs whose exons overlap protein coding exons (same strand) 1611 2290 3177 497 Homologs with conserved number of exons 1534 2407 2958 689 MOUSE Best Candidates: There are 148 transcripts that have < 20% repeat coverage, conserved exon structure, do not overlap protein coding exons and are best reciprocal homologs with the human queries

14 PipeR: lncRNA Homology Mapping
GENECODE lncRNAs Vs Complete Genomes PipeR: lncRNA Homology Mapping Anchor points: ENCODE vs Mouse with tuned Blast Extension: Exonerate Filtering: Id and Coverage Validation of the GFF annotation Overlap with Annotation Overlap with Cufflink Models RPKM on target genome Further Mapping Parameter Space Exploration using Experimental Evidences GFF File Notredame, Bussotti

15 BlastR vs The World

16 BlastR vs The World

17 blastnOpt (12487) a) blastn (8749) all (7492) blastr (12093) b) c)
Figure 2: Exon read support. Venn-diagram indicating the number of exon detected by different methods (numbers in parentesis) and their intersection (transcripts annotated identically by the three methods). Average amount of reads per exons Percent of reads covered by at least one exon all (7492) blastr (12093) b) c)

18 Part 2: Ensembl.v65 lncRNAs screening vs human and mouse genomes
Strategy: PipeR one2many homolog assignment Template: PipeR Parameters: Blast - Freyhult parametrization - Lower case masking - Low complexity masking Exonerate - est2genome model - 70% coverage required - seed extension 2X (the span of the genomic size of the query on both sides) genes 3845 transcripts 5669 exons 18353 sum of mature transcript length (nt) real coverage (nt) non overlapping loci 2790

19 Ensembl.v65 vs human genome
mapped 1187 transcripts out of 5669 many lncRNAs found in multiple copies (lncRNA families) - found homologs corresponding to exons Annotations of discovered homologs are readily available

20 Ensembl.v65 vs mouse genome
mapped 5622 transcripts out of 5669 many lncRNAs found in multiple copies (lncRNA families) - found homologs corresponding to exons Annotations of discovered homologs are readily available

21 Exon Number Conservation
Mouse/Human Exon Number Conservation Difference between the number of exons in the mouse transcripts and in the human homologs “0” means that the exon number is the same Negative bins indicate human homologs having more exons than the mouse query 481 Ensemblv65 transcripts find at least 1 homolog in human with the same exon number mouse < human mouse > human

22 Homolog repeat coverage
Not observed a peak of homolog predictions fully covered by repeats

23 Ensemble.65 and GENCODEv10 repeat coverage
Input lncRNA datasets have similar repeat distributions

24 Mapping statistics HUMAN MOUSE 879 1187 3815 13193 5622 3642 41005
ensV65 mapped genes 879 ensV65 mapped transcripts 1187 Total homologs 13193 Homologs whose exons overlap protein coding exons (same strand) 3642 Homologs whose exons do not overlap any gencode v10 element (same strand) 6085 Homologs with conserved number of exons 4925 ensV65 mapped genes 3815 ensV65 mapped transcripts 5622 Total homologs 41005 Homologs whose exons overlap protein coding exons (same strand) 10086 MOUSE HUMAN

25 Part 3: GENCODE v10 lncRNA coding potential check
Strategies: 1) GeneId ORF score comparison between mRNAs and lncRNAs 2) BlastX against human proteins (ensembl 65) 3) Overlap with protein coding gene exon annotations (gencodeV10) 4) PipeR filtering routines

26 1) ORF scores as returned by GeneID
2) blastX against human proteins indicates that GENCODE v10 lncRNAs match proteins Parameters: seg low complexity filtering, repeat filtering , evalue 10e-10, search just the plus strand. Human Ensembl 65 protein set

27 3) Checked the overlap between GENCODE v10 lncRNA exons and GENCODE v10 protein coding exons. - Found 846 lncRNA having at least one exon overlapping with a protein coding gene exon Example 1 Example 2

28 4) Extensive filtering 7813 GENCODE v10 transcripts passed *ALL* PipeR filtering routines Filtering rules: - overlap with protein coding exons - geneID ORF score similar to the ones of mRNA - blastX to uniprot database (50% redundancy) - blastX to nr database - rpsBlast to pfam domain families - blast against Rfam


Download ppt "Homology Based Analysis of the Human/Mouse lncRNome"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google