Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Forest Practices Code Transition Protection of Environmental Values Rod Davis Manager, Ecosystem Planning and Standards, WLAP.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Forest Practices Code Transition Protection of Environmental Values Rod Davis Manager, Ecosystem Planning and Standards, WLAP."— Presentation transcript:

1 Forest Practices Code Transition Protection of Environmental Values Rod Davis Manager, Ecosystem Planning and Standards, WLAP

2 FPC Transition Why the change for Transition A?  Mandate to establish objectives & clear direction for resources overseen by WLAP –wildlife, fish, water  Reduced staff, so focus on:  Objectives-setting  Monitoring & enforcement  Eliminate joint-ministry decisions  Moving toward results-based approach

3 FPC Transition What does WLAP do? 1. CHANGES from current Code  Within government’s policy limits, it is WLAP’s responsibility to establish:  identified wildlife: WHAs, GWMs  ungulate winter range: within existing TSR II budget  wildlife habitat features  WLAP will ensure:  Consultation & science-based approach  Decisions will reflect government’s social/environmental/economic direction

4 FPC Transition What does WLAP do? 2. SAME as under the FPC  species at risk  threatened or endangered fish  watersheds with significant downstream fisheries values  timing windows & measures  water quality objectives  temperature-sensitive streams  livestock for vegetation management

5 FPC Transition What does WLAP no longer do? 1. CHANGES from current Code  District Manager is now the sole decision- maker –various regulations:  making things “known”  harvesting in OGMAs  road locations in community watersheds  Other provisions – SDM removed:  notifications to water licensees only  maintaining stream bank stability – no removing stable material, roots, etc.

6 FPC Transition What does WLAP no longer do? 2. SAME as under the FPC  Some changes that eliminated joint DEO authorities were already in place (since July 2002):  No joint-approvals for FDP  No DEO agreement related to FDP approvals, e.g., riparian assessments  No DEO agreement for variances in widths of riparian reserve or management zones

7 FPC Transition Changes related to Site Plans  Wildlife tree retention & basal area retention in riparian management zones  Site plans show riparian class & mappable reserves – WTR & riparian mgmt. areas  For WTR: Default performance standard from the Landscape Unit Planning Guide  For basal area retention: Must be specified by licensees in a measurable, enforceable % or range in FDP content  DM approves FDP; may request additional info

8 FPC Transition How have roles & responsibilities changed for WLAP?  Set objectives up front in areas under WLAP mandate: UWR, ID’d Wildlife, wildlife habitat features  No referrals or joint-approvals for operational plans  Related WLAP work:  develop BMPs & guidelines  effectiveness monitoring  C&E – enforcement role

9 FPC Transition End of WLAP Presentation on Protection of Environmental Values with Rod Davis


Download ppt "Forest Practices Code Transition Protection of Environmental Values Rod Davis Manager, Ecosystem Planning and Standards, WLAP."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google