Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKendra Saffell Modified over 9 years ago
1
Compare ideal Interpolation filter and interpolation by LSE FIR filter(Final) Advisor : Dr. Yung-AN Kao Student: Ying Chun Chen
2
Outline Kaiser Window Comparison (Simulation) Conclusion & Future work Reference
3
Kaiser Window
4
Kaiser Window (Simulation) Filter coefficient M=65 Cutoff freq=0.2 1 st Passband freq=0.15 1 st Stopband freq=0.25 1 st Delta=0.002 2 nd Passband freq=0.1 2 nd Stopband freq=0.3 2 nd Delta=1.0133*10 -5 3 rd Passband freq=0.17 3 rd Stopband freq=0.23 3 rd Delta=0.016662
5
Comparison(1/14) Filter coefficient M=65 Interpolation filter by Kaiser Window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 1 st Passband freq=0.1 1 st Stopband freq=0.3 2 nd Passband freq=0.17 2 nd Stopband freq=0.23 3 rd Passband freq=0.15 3 rd Stopband freq=0.25
6
Comparison (2/14) Filter coefficient M=65 Interpolation filter by Kaiser Window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 1 st Passband freq=0.1 1 st Stopband freq=0.3 2 nd Passband freq=0.17 2 nd Stopband freq=0.23 3 rd Passband freq=0.15 3 rd Stopband freq=0.25
7
Comparison (3/14) Filter coefficient M=65 Interpolation filter by LSE FIR filter,Kaiser window and traditional Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 Kaiser Window 1 st Passband freq=0.15 1 st Stopband freq=0.25 2 nd Passband freq=0.1 2 nd Stopband freq=0.3 3 rd Passband freq=0.17 3 rd Stopband freq=0.23
8
Comparison (4/14) Filter coefficient M=65 Interpolation filter by LSE FIR filter,Kaiser window and traditional Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 Kaiser Window 1 st Passband freq=0.15 1 st Stopband freq=0.25 2 nd Passband freq=0.1 2 nd Stopband freq=0.3 3 rd Passband freq=0.17 3 rd Stopband freq=0.23
9
Comparison (5/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.17 Stopband freq=0.23 =0.06 Delta=0.016662
10
Comparison (6/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.17 Stopband freq=0.23 =0.06 Delta=0.016662
11
Comparison (7/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 =0.1 Delta=0.002
12
Comparison (8/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 =0.1 Delta=0.002
13
Comparison (9/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.1 Stopband freq=0.3 =0.2 Delta=1.0133*10 -5
14
Comparison (10/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.1 Stopband freq=0.3 =0.2 Delta=1.0133 10 -5
15
Comparison (11/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Ideal Interpolation filter Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25
16
Comparison (12/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Ideal Interpolation filter Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25
17
Comparison (13/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by LSE FIR filter Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25
18
Comparison (14/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by LSE FIR filter Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25
19
Comparison (7/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 =0.1 Delta=0.002
20
Comparison (8/14) Filter coefficient M=13 Interpolation filter by Kaiser window Upsample=5 Cutoff freq=0.2 Passband freq=0.15 Stopband freq=0.25 =0.1 Delta=0.002
21
Conclusion & Future work The New Design Method is better than traditional Method in performance. Peak error is adjusted by transition-band in Kaiser Window. Compare the new design Method with MMSE 、 Polynomial Lagrange FIR interpolation filter. Is IIR Filter suitable for the new method??
22
Reference F.M.Gardner, ”Interpolation in digital modems-Part I :Fundamental” IEEE Trans.Commun.,vol.41 pp.502-508,Mar.1993 J.V.,F.L.,T.S.,andM.R. ”The effects of quantizing the fractional interval in interpolation filters” Heinrich Meyr,Marc Moeneclaey,Stefan A. Fechtel “Digital Communication Receivers”. New York :Wiley 1997 C. S. Burrus, A. W. Soewito and R. A. Gopnath, “Least Squared Error FIR Filter Design with Transition Bands,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 40, No. 6, pp.1327-1338, June 1992. Heinrich Meyr,Marc Moeneclaey,Stefan A. Fechtel “Digital Communication Receivers”. New York :Wiley 1997 Alan V. Oppenheim,Ronald W. Schafer with John R. Buck “Discrete- Time Signal Processing”.
23
~~~Happy Chinese New Year~~~~
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.