Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJaiden Nacke Modified over 9 years ago
1
Outlook: Higgs, SUSY, flavor Ken-ichi Hikasa (Tohoku U.) Fourth Workshop, Origin of Mass and SUSY March 8, 2006, Epochal Tsukuba
2
Apology This is not designed to be a summary talk …, so no reference to most of the talks
3
Standard Model
4
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge H: Higgs Y: Yukawa
5
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge D H: Higgs Y: Yukawa All gauge interactions from D = + ig A Universality: unique coupling, blindness to generations
6
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge H: Higgs 4 Y: Yukawa Symmetry breaking, W,Z masses Higgs mass term 2 : only dimensional parameter in SM (classically) sets the weak scale
7
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge H: Higgs Y: Yukawa y f f Fermion couplings to Higgs field give masses to quarks/leptons
8
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge D H: Higgs Y: Yukawa Only interaction experimentally confirmed: 2/3 of SM still to be tested
9
SM = GHY Three elements G: gauge H: Higgs Y: Yukawa y ij f i f j No ‘ universality ’ : origin of flavor difference and mixing Most # of parameters in SM
10
Generation mixing u1u1 u2u2 d1d1 d2d2 If no Yukawa coupling, generation labels has no meaning
11
Generation mixing u1u1 u2u2 d1d1 d2d2 Charged current interactions connects ups and downs W±W±
12
Generation mixing Yukawa couplings breaks the generation symmetry u1u1 u2u2 d1d1 d2d2 u c d s
13
Generation mixing Mismatch of ups and downs gives the Cabibbo mixing u1u1 u2u2 d1d1 d2d2 u c d s CC W
14
Leptons If the neutrinos were massless … 1 2 1 2 e
15
Leptons Neutrino eigenstates can be defined only by charged current and the lepton flavors are conserved 1 2 1 2 e e
16
Neutrino mass (side remark) In SM, is made to be massless Quark-lepton correspondence Naturally expect R & Yukawa R : gauge blind particle (hard to see) Ultratiny mass suggests different origin Important question: Dirac or Majorana?
17
Higgs sector
18
I weak = ½ Rule Quark/lepton masses have to be I weak = ½ W, Z masses can have any I weak Precision measurements: experimental evidence for I weak = ½ dominance
19
I weak = ½ Rule =1 to high precision doublet vev dominance
20
Indirect Higgs limit M top (GeV) M W (GeV) 150 175 200 80.5 80.4 80.3
21
Direct Higgs searches Still a long way to go, but worth pursueing
22
MSSM implies light Higgs
23
MSSM/two doublet Large tan region started to be excluded at Tevatron A0 +-A0 +-
24
Beyond SM Standard Model is not the final story
25
(Observational) reasons we need BSM Gravity Dark Matter Dark Energy Baryon asymmetry CMB Neutrino mass
26
(Theoretical) reasons we need BSM No strong CP violation Hierarchy problem? Too many parameters? Unification of gravity
27
Where to seek for BSM New particles Energy frontier Faint interactions (can be light) Forbidden processes baryon # violation lepton # violation lepton flavor violation (seen in oscillations, but very small) Suppressed processes
28
Weak interaction processes Superallowed t b, c s CKM suppressed (tree-allowed but small) b c, u; s u GIM suppressed (tree-forbidden) FCNC b s, d; s d Good place to look for new physics
29
BSM Scenarios
30
Supersymmetry Raison d ’ être aka excuse: Unique nontrivial extension of the Poincaré group (= Einstein ’ s relativity) Motivation @ weak scale: Stabilize Fermi-Planck hierarchy by cancelling loop corrections
31
Extra Dimensions Raison d ’ être aka excuse: Superstrings require 10 spacetime dimensions for consistency Motivation @ weak scale: (Originally) trading the Fermi-Planck hierarchy for large extra-dim size More recently, branes, Randall-Sundrum hierarchy, …
32
Extra Dimensions All SM interactions are nonrenormalizable for D>5 Couplings tend to blow up above weak scale: Strong-coupling phenomena at TeV (Technicolor-type physics) Higgsless models: Heavy W,Z recurrences should appear
33
And many others
34
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
35
MSSM Many parameters (>100) New sources of flavor structure Sfermion masses (left and right) LR mixing (A term) New sources of CP violation LSP neutralino: good DM candidate
36
D-squark mass matrix One new source of flavor mixing
37
D-squark mass matrix Chiral substructure of sfermion mass
38
Vast parameter space Most regions contradict with neutral Kaon mixing mSUGRA, CMSSM: tiny regions in the parameter space Useful as a guideline Should not trust too much
39
Varied phenomenology Different mass patterns Generally: colored > noncolored Split SUSY: scalars > gauginos Focus point: light higgsinos Interesting alternatives Gauge mediation: stau LSP Anomaly mediation: light wino R parity violation: exotic resonances
40
Dark Matter
41
Rare b decays In SM, b s is much more suppressed than b c good place for new physics b-s sfermion mixing can contribute to CP asymmetry
42
New physics effects on b s
43
Sign of SUSY contributions Extra contribution to s L Same sign deviation for B K and ’ K New mixing of s R Opposite sign deviation for B K and ’ K
44
Consequence of possible deviation If both K and ’ K deviates in the same direction, new physics are in the left-handed sector (the data are old) Endo, Mishima, Yamaguchi
45
Lepton-flavor violation Neutrino mass mixing: way too small effect on charged lepton FV Supersymmetry: slepton mass matrix gives new LFV source GUT: quark mixing lepton mixing Right-handed new mixing source Observable effect expected in , e etc.
46
Conclusions
47
Tevatron has plunged into new luminosity frontier SM Higgs: important target to pursue MSSM/Two doublet: already started to constrain parameter space Supersymmetry, XD, etc: Don ’ t wait for LHC
48
Conclusions (cont ’ d) B factories Very rich physics output Good measurements of all 3 angles Hint of new physics?? LFV: unique place to seek for BSM Kaon physics should not be discontinued
49
Future LHC, ILC B physics K physics
50
One final remark ‘Mass-origin’ priority-area grant ends in one month, but We are still on the way!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.