Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCasandra Staley Modified over 9 years ago
1
The abrupt transition from theta to hyper- excitable spiking activity in stellate cells from layer II of the medial entorhinal cortex Horacio G. Rotstein Department of Mathematical Sciences New Jersey Institute of Technology Network Synchronization: From dynamical systems to neuroscience Leiden (NL) - May 27, 2008
2
Collaborators Tilman Kispersky Program in Neuroscience - Boston University Nancy Kopell Math & Center for BioDynamics – Boston University Martin Wechselberger Math – University of Sidney John White Biomedical Engineering – University of Utah
3
Entorhinal Cortex & Hippocampus Photomicrograph of a section through the rat hippocampal region (Gluck & Myers). Adapted from Amaral & Witter (1989). Photomicrograph of a section through the rat hippocampal region (Gluck & Myers). Adapted from Amaral & Witter (1989)
4
Stellate cells (SCs) Entorhinal cortex (EC) is the interface between the neocortex and the hippocampus. Information flows from the neocortex to the hippocampus through the superficial layers (II and III) of the EC. SCs are the most abundant cell type in layer II of the EC. SCs are putative grid cells.
5
Subthreshold oscillations (STOs) SCs develop rhythmic STOs at theta frequencies (8 – 12 Hz). Spikes occur at the peaks of STOs but not at every cycle. Interaction between two currents: h- and persistent sodium. Single cell phenomenon Depolarization increases from 1 to 3 (Adapted from Dickson et al., J. Neurophysiol., 2000)
6
SCs: Theta regime (background) SCs have intrinsic biophysical properties that endow them with the ability to display rhythmic activity in the theta frequency regime (8 – 12 Hz) Subthreshold oscillations (STOs): interaction between a persistent sodium and a hyperpolarization-activated (h-) current. Spikes Mixed-mode oscillations (MMOs): STOs interspersed with spikes R., Oppermann, White, Kopell (JCNS – 2005) R., Wechselberger, Kopell (Submitted) Focus issue on MMOs (Chaos 2008)
7
SCs – Hyperexcitable regime (this project) SCs have intrinsic biophysical properties that endow them with the ability to display spiking activity in the “gamma” frequency regime (~60 Hz). This time scale can be uncovered by phasic excitation. The frequency regime depends on a combination of intrinsic and network properties. Kispersky, White & R., Work in Progress.
8
SC dynamic structure Nonlinearities and multiple time-scales in the subthreshold regime: How are they created? How do they depend on the intrinsic SC biophysical properties? How do they interact with synaptic (excitatory and inhibitory) inputs?
9
SC biophysical model
12
Subthreshold oscillations (STOs) and spikes in the SC model
13
STOs generated by persistent sodium channel noise in the SC model
14
Subthreshold Regime: Reduction of Dimensions Multiscale analysis: Identification of the active and inactive currents Identification of the appropriate time scales
15
Subthreshold Regime: Reduction of Dimensions Multiscale analysis: Identification of the active and inactive currents Identification of the appropriate time scales
16
Subthreshold regime: reduced SC model SC biophysical model Subthreshold regime
17
Subthreshold regime: reduced SC model
19
SC biophysical model Subthreshold regime
20
Subthreshold regime: reduced SC model
21
Nonlinear Artificially Spiking (NAS) SC model
24
Inhibitory inputs can advance the next spike by “killing” an STO.
25
Transition from theta to hyper-excitable (gamma) rhythmic activity Experimental (in vitro) results: There exist recurrent connections among SCs. These connections are “similar” in normal (control) and epileptic cells. Recurrent inhibitory circuits are reduced in epileptic cells as compared to normal (control) ones. Recurrent circuits in layer II of MEC in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Kumar, Buckmaster, Huguenard, J. Neurosci. (2007)
26
Minimal S-I network model
27
A minimal S-S network reproduces the experimentally found transition form normal activity to hyper- excitability in SCs due to lack of inhibition
28
Minimal S-I network model A minimal SIS network reproduces the experimentally found transition form normal activity to hyper- excitability in SCs due to lack of inhibition
29
Minimal SC network model (no inhibition) A small increase in the SC recurrent synaptic conductance causes an explosion of the SC firing frequency
30
Minimal SC network model (no inhibition) A small increase in the SC recurrent synaptic conductance causes an explosion of the SC firing frequency
31
Minimal S-I network model A small increase in the inhibitory input to the SCs brings their frequency back to the theta regime
32
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation Single SC model representing a population of synchronized (in phase) SCs.
33
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) Effects of changes in the maximal conductances
34
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) Effects of changes in the maximal conductances
35
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition)
36
The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
37
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
38
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
39
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
40
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
41
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
42
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
43
Single SC (no autapse - no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
44
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
45
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
46
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
47
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
48
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
49
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) The abrupt changes in the SC firing frequency are the result of phasic (synaptic) and not tonic excitation
50
Single SC + autapse (no inhibition) Tilman Kispersky & John White Dynamic clamp experiments
51
Voltage record of a stellate cell coupled to itself. Inset: close up view of a single burst Under control conditions
52
Dynamic clamp experiments Voltage record of a stellate cell coupled to itself. Inset: close up view of a single burst Under linopiridine application (M-channel blocker)
53
Dynamic clamp experiments Freq. vs. current under control conditions
54
Dynamic clamp experiments
55
Minimal S-I network model
56
Summary SCs have intrinsic biophysical properties that endow them with the ability to display rhythmic activity in the theta and “gamma” frequency regimes (nonlinearities and time scale separation) In “normal” conditions SCs display theta rhythmic activity (STOs and MMOs. Abrupt transitions resulting from recurrent excitation. Theoretical predictions confirmed by dynamic clamp experiments (Tilman Kispersky)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.