Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Plasma Visualization Diagnostics for KSTAR: ECEI and MIR C.W. Domier, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University of California at Davis FY09 US-KSTAR Collaboration Workshop.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Plasma Visualization Diagnostics for KSTAR: ECEI and MIR C.W. Domier, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University of California at Davis FY09 US-KSTAR Collaboration Workshop."— Presentation transcript:

1 Plasma Visualization Diagnostics for KSTAR: ECEI and MIR C.W. Domier, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University of California at Davis FY09 US-KSTAR Collaboration Workshop April 15-16, 2009 – San Diego, CA UC DAVIS P LASMA D IAGNOSTICS G ROUP

2 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

3 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

4 Introduction and Motivation ● A unique window of opportunity exists on KSTAR for fundamental understanding of MHD and turbulence not possible with ITER and future burning plasma experiments –Excellent port access –Advances in 3-D simulation capability –Advances in imaging diagnostics capability ● 2-D plasma microwave imaging tools –Electron Cyclotron Emission Imaging (ECEI) –Microwave Imaging Reflectometry (MIR) –Microwave Doppler Imaging Reflectometry (MDIR)

5 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

6 2-D ECE Imaging (ECEI) ● In conventional 1-D ECE radiometry, a single antenna receives all frequencies. In ECEI, a vertically aligned antenna/ mixer array is employed as the receiver. ● Advantages: high spatial and temporal resolution, 2-D correlation. ● Real time 2-D imaging using wideband IF electronics and single sideband detection. –16×8=128 channels on ASDEX-UG –20×16=320 channels on DIII-D –24×32=768 channels envisaged for KSTAR f ce R R

7 Video Amps Mixers IF Amps Detectors Antennas Mixers Baluns Preamps Filters Power Divider LO LO n Notch Filter ADCs Plasma Optics ECEI System Overview – TEXTOR Dichroic Plate LO 1

8 Imaging Fluctuation Reflectometry ● Microwave reflections from plasma cutoffs contain information on density fluctuations near the cutoff layer ● 1-D fluctuations: simple mirror-like interpretation ● 2-D fluctuations: the received signal is corrupted by interference from multiple reflected waves ● Imaging can restore phase fronts! 1-D fluctuations 2-D fluctuations

9 Microwave Imaging Reflectometry (MIR) ● Probing beam illuminates extended region of cutoff layer ● Beam curvature matched (toroidal and poloidal) to that of the cutoff surface ● Cutoff layer imaged onto array of detectors (3 elements shown), eliminating interference effects ● Detection system shares the same plasma-facing optics

10 Video Amps IF Amp I-Q Mixer Antenna Mixer Filters LO DACs Plasma Optics Beam Splitter Toriodal Mirror Window MIR Array LO Source Illumination Source Plasma Poloidal Mirror MIR Electronics MIR System Overview - TEXTOR

11 M icrowave D oppler I maging R eflectometry ● Off-axis probing beam is scattered by Doppler rotation of fluctuations near the cutoff layer ● Optics angularly resolve the reflected/scattered waves onto imaging array Ray tracing of Doppler reflectometry system on Tore-Supra

12 Comparison Between MIR and MDIR ● Common features –Planar imaging array –Large aperture optics –Multiple frequencies to probe multiple cutoff layers ● Major differences –MDIR illumination beam is narrower, and tilted with respect to plasma midplane –MDIR probes poloidal scattering angle rather than vertical position MIR MDIR

13 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

14 Single Array ECEI on TEXTOR Single array implementation with 16×8 T e image resolution

15 TEXTOR Study of “Sawtooth Oscillation” ECEI demonstrated “random 3-D reconnection zone,” in which the reconnection zone has been observed to occur everywhere (including high field side, see video left)

16 Single Array ECEI on ASDEX-UG TEXTOR system transferred to ASDEX-UG in Jan. 2009, and will begin operation in May 2009

17 Dual Array ECEI on DIII-D ● Horizontal and vertical zoom control with full remote capability ● Two array system, each 20×8 channels expandable to 20×24 ● Installation in Sept. 2009, with first results in Oct. 2009 27 cm 1.3 m Narrow zoom Narrow spacing

18 Dual Array ECEI on DIII-D ● Horizontal and vertical zoom control with full remote capability ● Two array system, each 20×8 channels expandable to 20×24 ● Installation in Sept. 2009, with first results in Oct. 2009 Wide zoom Wide spacing 55 cm 1.3 m

19 Dual Array ECEI on DIII-D ● Horizontal and vertical zoom control with full remote capability ● Two array system, each 20×8 channels expandable to 20×24 ● Installation in Sept. 2009, with first results in Oct. 2009 Wide zoom Wide spacing 55 cm 1.3 m

20 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

21 Ongoing Development Activities ● Mini-lens imaging array concept and vertical zoom optics ● Horizontal zoom ECEI electronics and frequency extenders ● Quasi-optical notch filters ● High frequency imaging antennas ● Multi-frequency MIR sources

22 Mini-Lens Array Configuration Advantages ● Elliptical substrate lens optimizes coupling and reduces sidelobes ● Eliminates off-axis aberrations ● Uses front side LO pumping for enhanced coupling, increased sensitivity and wide bandwidth (octave) operation LO Beam Mini-Lenses Antennas Beam Splitter

23 ECEI Array LO Source Zoom Control Lenses Focal Plane Translation Lens Beamsplitter New Mini-Lens ECEI System Optics Notch Filters (3)

24 New Vertical Zoom Optics Wide Zoom Shot 107808 Narrow Zoom Shot 107809 T e images courtesy of Prof. T. Munsat at the University of Colorado

25 Horizontal spacing and spot size can now be independently and remotely-controlled New Horizontal Zoom Electronics

26 Multiple Modules for Increased Coverage Standardized modules can be ganged together to extend RF coverage –Two modules provide 16 GHz coverage –Three modules provide 24.5 GHz coverage

27 New “Stackable” Notch Filters ● Highly collimated mini-lens beams permit significantly improved ECRH shielding –Relaxed angular requirements (≤ 8°) –Stack up to 3 notch filters in series ● 140 GHz filter stack installed on TEXTOR (single filter results shown below) ● 170 GHz filter stack under development for KSTAR Quasi-Optical Notch Filters

28 Antennas/Mixers for High-Field ECEI ● Two approaches under investigation to realize imaging antennas for ECEI on KSTAR under high-field (3-3.5 T) conditions ● Fundamental mixers require high frequency (150-220 GHz) sources with >40 mW output power  difficult to obtain! ● 2 nd harmonic mixers have 2-3 dB worse conversion losses, but can use lower frequency (75-110 GHz) sources  readily available! f RF Fundamental Mixer f LO f IF = f RF - f LO f RF 2 nd Harmonic Mixer f LO ≈ ½ f RF f IF = f RF - 2f LO

29 POSTECH Collaboration (Prof. Hyeon Park) on MIR Characterization TEXTOR MIR system now set up at POSTECH for detailed laboratory measurements and characterization

30 PPPL Collaboration (Dr. Gerrit Kramer) on MIR Modelling 2-D simulations of microwaves reflected from a circular plasma, with an illumination beam curvature-matched to the plasma

31 Kyungpook National University Collaboration (Prof. Kangwook Kim) on MIR Illumination Sources Schematic illustrating how a simultaneous “comb” of illumination frequencies can probe multiple cutoff layers, as each frequency reflects from a distinct cutoff layer

32 Kyungpook National University Collaboration (Prof. Kangwook Kim) on MIR Illumination Sources

33 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

34 KSTAR Diagnostic Layout

35 ECEI Configuration: ~2T ● Low field (~2 T) design for ECEI only ● High field side (HFS) and low field side (LFS) systems share the same zoom optics (inside cassette) ● Two array configuration per port, each generating 24(v)×8(h) T e images expandable to 24×24 images Plasma Focal lenses Vacuum window Zoom lenses Beam splitter Toroidal lenses Cassette LFS array HFS array Mirror

36 ECEI on KSTAR at 2.0 T 33 cm 100 cm High Field Side Low Field Side

37 ECEI on KSTAR at 2.0 T 33 cm 100 cm High Field Side Low Field Side

38 ECEI on KSTAR at 2.0 T 51 cm 100 cm High Field Side Low Field Side

39 ECEI/MIR Configuration: 3-3.5 T Plasma Focal lenses Vacuum window Zoom lenses Dichroic Plate Toroidal lenses Cassette ECEI array MIR array Beamsplitter MIR Source ● High field design for simultaneous ECEI and MIR/MDIR ● Two array ECEI configuration, each generating 24×8 T e images expandable to 24×24 images ● Single array MIR/MDIR configuration with a 16 element array and up to 8 simultaneous frequencies/cutoff layers ● Decision to implement MIR or MDIR (or both) dependent upon results from joint POSTECH and PPPL study into MIR physics

40 ECEI at High Field (3-3.5 T) High Field Side Low Field Side 51 cm 100 cm

41 MIR/MDIR at High Field (3-3.5 T) 20 cm 100 cm

42 Outline ● Introduction and Overview ● Diagnostic Principles –T e Measurements via ECEI –n e Measurements via MIR and MDIR ● Experience on Previous and Current Systems ● Ongoing Development Activities ● Low Field (~2 T) and High Field (3-3.5 T) Conceptual Designs ● Diagnostic Development Plan

43 Diagnostic Development Plan FY2009 –Design multi-array low field (~2 T) ECEI system –Develop multi-frequency source technology for MIR/MDIR (collaboration with Kyungpook National University) –Fabricate and test high performance 170 GHz notch filters FY2010 –Fabricate and characterize multi-array low-field ECEI system –Install multi-array low-field ECEI system on KSTAR –Fabricate and test prototype high-field (3.0-3.5 T) ECEI antennas –POSTECH and PPPL to complete MIR system tests; results to be used to design optimum MIR and/or MDIR optical configuration FY2011 –Operate and maintain low-field ECEI system on KSTAR –Design high field (3-3.5 T) simultaneous ECEI and MIR/MDIR system

44 Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "Plasma Visualization Diagnostics for KSTAR: ECEI and MIR C.W. Domier, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University of California at Davis FY09 US-KSTAR Collaboration Workshop."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google