1. US 101 Corridor Mobility Master Plan Agenda Item B-1 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Board Meeting August 6, 2014 – B-1

2. 2  Review the scope of work  Public Outreach input  What’s in the B/C ratio?  Review the project packages – get input  What comes next August 6, 2014 – B-1 PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION

3. 3 US 101 STUDY SCOPE OF WORK August 6, 2014 – B-1 Spring 2013 Project Vision and Performance Measures Phase I Performance Measures “Cartogram” Phase I Outreach – June 2013 “Cartogram” Existing and Future Conditions Focus Study Segments Approved October 2013 Phase II Outreach – Improvement Concepts January 2014 Deficiencies, Performance, Improvements Benefit / Cost analysis Multi-modal Packages – July 8, 2014 Task Force Phase III Outreach – July 9, 2014 Expanded Technical Analysis August 22, 2014 September 6, 2014 October 1, 2014 Draft and Final Plan

4. 4 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT August 6, 2014 – B-1 Phase 1 - Focus Segments Website Interactive web tool Intercept interviews 3 Public workshops 14 agency meetings Phase 2 – Improvement Concepts Interactive web tool 5 county/council meetings 3 public workshops 2 KSBY interviews Phase 3 Evaluation & Selection 9 county/council meetings One workshop

5. 5 In Development Projects under development at a local agency - or will be soon LOVR widening over US 101 Bob Jones Bike/Ped pathway Brisco Road Interchange Planned Projects in the planning stage: Bike/Ped trail from Pismo to 227 (Anza Trail Corridor) Highway Continue to develop in planning documents, RTP Existing Facilities Projects that are related to maintenance, signal timing, lighting issues Forward to local agencies, acknowledge maintenance issues in RTP 2014 RTP Umbrella RTP Policy: Interchange improvements must be designed to encourage bike/ped projects consistent with local bike plans and complete streets policies PROJECTS SUGGESTED THOUGH OUTREACH THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS August 6, 2014 – B-1

6. 6 SMART MOBILITY FRAMEWORK August 6, 2014 – B-1

7. 7 SMART MOBILITY FRAMEWORK August 6, 2014 – B-1

8. 8 Tier 1 12 performance measures used to evaluate the 70 miles Result: focus on approximately 20 miles in 4 focused study segments Informational tool: Cartogram Tier 2 Evaluated 140 projects/project alternatives using delay, VMT, safety, emissions, and health Result: projects selected through Task Force process Informational tool: B/C ratio PERFORMANCE EVALUATION August 6, 2014 – B-1

9. 9 Freeways & Intersections Projects Delay Savings Emission Reduction Crash Reduction Multimodal Mobility Projects VMT Savings Delay Savings Emission Reduction Health TDM Programs VMT Savings Emission Reduction Network Improvement Projects VMT Savings Emission Reduction MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS June 4, 2014 – A-2

10. 10 Delays $ / person hours VMT Direct fuel cost ($ / mile) Non-fuel cost ($ / mile) Safety $ / crash Emissions Health $ / ton CO2-eq $ / active trip PROJECT BENEFITS June 4, 2014 – A-2

11. 11  Construction  Capital support  Right of Way PROJECT COSTING June 4, 2014 – A-2

12. 12 Project B/C Annualized Project Benefits Annualized Project Costs BENEFIT/COST RATIO June 4, 2014 – A-2 Ancillary Benefits Consistent with SLOCOG/Caltrans policy Environmental/Institutional Sensitivity Community Support Social Equity

13. 13 PROJECTS SELECTED FOR ALL SEGMENTS August 6, 2014 – B-1 Pedestrian and bicycle improvements will be included as part of all interchange projects listed on next slides.

14. 14 FOCUS STUDY SEGMENT 1 August 6, 2014 – B-1

15. 15 FOCUS SEGMENT 2 August 6, 2014 – B-1

16. 16 FOCUS STUDY SEGMENT 3 August 6, 2014 – B-1

17. 17 FOCUS STUDY SEGMENT 4 August 6, 2014 – B-1

18. 18 OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS – SEGMENT 1

19. 19 OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS – SEGMENT 2

20. 20 OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN TECHNICAL ANALYSIS – SEGMENTS 3 & 4

21. 21 NEXT STEP: TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY August 6, 2014 – B-1

22. 22 TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY August 6, 2014 – A-2

23. 23 RTP INTEGRATION August 6, 2014 – A-2 Regional Transportation Plan US 101 Focused Study Segments: Four packages of multimodal improvements US 101 Non-Focused Study Segments: planning documents, agency discussion All other Highways SR 46, SR 41, SR 58, SR 166, SR 227, SR 1 All other Regional needs Bike, Pedestrian, Transit, TDM – Region-wide

24. 24 Recommendations: 1.Review and comment on improvement packages 2.Schedule draft report in September 3.Final report at October 1 st SLOCOG Board meeting June 4, 2014 – A-2 TTAC: Support CTAC: Support

26. 26 PHASE I PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT August 6, 2014 – A-2