Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAndrew Dawson Modified over 10 years ago
1
The Maze Procedure in Mitral Vale Disease Ki-Bong Kim, MD Dept. of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery Seoul National University Hospital
2
Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation Prevalence : 0.15-1.0 % of general population 8-17 % of population > 60 yrs 70-80 % in pts w/ MV disease 40-60 % in pts undergoing surgery for Tx of MV disease Incidence of asso. thromboembolism : 33 % 75 % of episodes can involve the brain 60 % of those events can result in death or severe morbidity
3
Three Untoward Effects of AF Unpleasantness of an irregular heart beat Impaired hemodynamics because of the loss of AV synchrony Vulnerability to the thromboembolic complications
7
The extended op time needed for complicated multiple atrial incisions may preclude application of the CM-III as a concomitant op w/ standard OHS. We modified the CM-III to decrease op time, while retaining the important principles of the maze incisions. The Cox-Maze III Procedure
8
Conventional CM-IIIModified CM-III Modification of the Cox-Maze III Procedure Ki-Bong Kim, et al Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:816-22
9
An 8½ -Year Clinical Experience with Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation Cox JL, et al Ann Surg 1996;224:267-75
10
Methods Sept 1987 – March 1996 164 pts between 3 mo & 8½ yrs after op CM-I ; 32 pts CM-II ; 14 pts CM-III ; 118 pts 59 pts (33%) underwent concomitant op in addition to the Maze procedure Ann Surg 1996;224:267
11
Surgical Indications Arrhythmia intolerance ; DOE, easy fatigability, lethargy, malaise, general sense of impending doom during AF Drug intolerance ; unsuccessful tx of max amount of tolerable drug therapy Previous TE ; significant temporary or permanent neurological deficit Documented cerebral TE in the absence of other demonstrable etiologies absolute Ix for surgery because anticoagulation does not protect from a second stroke Ann Surg 1996;224:267
12
Indications for Surgical Tx for AF Indication n / Total % Arrhythmia Intolerance 118 / 178 66 Drug Intolerance 16 / 178 9 Previous TE 44 / 178 25
13
Results 93 % ; arrhythmia free w/o any antiarrhythmic medication 7 % ; converted to SR w/ medical tx Of the 107 pts who were documented to have normal SA node pre-op, only 1 pt required a permanent PM Ann Surg 1996;224:267
14
Restoration of Atrial Transport Function Following the MAZE procedure Procedure RA Function (+) LA Function (+) Maze-I 32/32 (100%) 23/32 (72%) Maze-II 11/11 (100%) 7/11 (64%) Maze -III 80/82 (98%) 77/82 (94%) Total 123/125 (98%) 107/125 (86%)
15
Contraindications Significant LV dysfunction, not attributable to the arrhythmia itself Concomitant cardiac / non-cardiac disease that constitutes an excessive surgical risk Pts w/ severe HOCM because of the excessive risk asso. w/ the combined procedures Ann Surg 1996;224:267
16
Restoration of Atrial Function After the Maze Procedure for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation ; Assessment by Doppler Echocardiography Feinberg MS, et al Circulation 1994;5 (pt II):II-285-92
17
METHODS 46 pts 8 ± 7 mo after the Maze Additional procedures in 13 pts Circulation 1994;5 (pt II):II-285
18
RESULTS Restoration of RA contraction ; 83% (38/46) LA contraction ; 61% (28/46) % atrial filling fraction of RA that of LA % atrial filling fraction of RA in pts w/ active atrial contraction was comparable to that of control (32±7 vs 33±8 %, p=NS), whereas that of LA was smaller (20±5 vs 36±7 %, p<0.05). Circulation 1994;5 (pt II):II-285
19
The Outcome and Indications of the Cox Maze III Procedure for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation With Mitral Valve Disease Isobe F, et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:220-7
20
METHODS 30/34 pts w/ AF + MV disease 4 pts were excluded 3 w/ incomplete cut & suture d/t severe calcification & adhesions 1 died of post LV rupture 21 Rheumatic 8 Degenerative 1 PVF JTCVS 1998;116:220
21
RESULTS F/U > 6 mo after the op (2.1±0.9 yrs) SR was restored in 27 pts (90%) RA contractility (+) in 100 % (27/27) LA contractility (+) in 67 % (18/27) AF persisted in 3 pts (10%) JTCVS 1998;116:220
22
RESULTS (SR group vs AF group RESULTS (SR group vs AF group ) f-wave voltage in lead V1 0.23±0.10 vs 0.06±0.05 mV p=0.01 CTR 60±5 vs 78±10 % p= 0.006 LA systolic dimension (Doppler) 57±8 vs 95±24 mm p= 0.005 AF duration 5.1±4.6 vs 11.8±5.5 yrs p= 0.049 » » Predisposing factors for the post-op persistence of AF JTCVS 1998;116:220
23
RESULTS No pts resumed SR when CTR ≥ 70 % & LA systolic dimension ≥ 80 mm before the op JTCVS 1998;116:220
24
RESULTS A/E ratio of trans-mitral flow was low in pts w/ the Maze procedure as compared w/ the normal valve Regarding the restoration of LA function, f-wave voltage, CTR, & LA systolic dimension showed no significant difference between the pts w/ positive & negative a-waves, & only the duration of AF showed statistically significant difference ( p=0.011 ). JTCVS 1998;116:220
25
Rationale of the Cox Maze Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation During Redo Mitral Valve Operations Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Isobe F, et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1216-22
26
METHODS 42 pts w/ redo MV + Maze procedure 37 Kosakai’s modified Maze 2 CM-II 3 CM-III F-U after op : 25.5 ± 10.8 mo. Control group : 54 pts w/ redo MV w/o Maze procedure JTCVS 1996;112:1216
27
RESULTS SR was regained in 28/42 pts (67 %) Doppler study LA contraction in 16/28 pts (57%) RA contraction in 21/28 pts (75 %) JTCVS 1996;112:1216
28
Comparison between pts w/ & w/o restored sinus rhythm Variables SR (+) SR(-) p-value No. 28 14 Age (yr) 57.8±10.0 56.1±9.3 NS Rheumatic 23(82%) 13(94%) NS Duration of AF (yr) 9.0±6.0 15.9±4.6 0.0009 f-wave on V1 (mV) 0.18±0.1 0.10±0.08 0.017 CT ratio (%) 63±8 67±5 0.049 LAD (mm) 57±9 57±6 NS
29
JTCVS 1996;112:1216 Results of op in the maze & control groups Maze group Control groupp-value Maze group Control group p-value No. 42 54 ACC time (min) 133±28 121±44 0.048 CPB time (min) 211±43 197±78 0.012 C-tube drainage(ml) 890±510 840±480 NS Blood transfusion (ml) 2120±1600 2140±1760 NS # Transfusion 7(17%) 11(20%) NS Hospital Mortality 0(0%) 4(7.4%) NS Bleeding reop 6(14%) 4(7.4%) NS Mediastinitis 0(0%) 2(3.7%) NS
30
CONCLUSION The Maze procedure should be considered in selected pts who have a high possibility of regaining SR during redo MV op. The Maze procedure should be performed concomitantly w/ MVR while preserving the MV apparatus for moderately depressed LV function, inasmuch as atrial contraction is very important. JTCVS 1996;112:1216
31
The Cox Maze III Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Rheumatic Mitral Valve Disease Ki-Bong Kim, et al Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:799-804
32
METHODS 75 CM-III pts for AF asso w/ rheumatic MV disease 14 cases ; Reop because of PVF ANTS 1999;68:799
33
INDICATIONS Indications to perform concomitant CM-III Chronic AF >1 yr LA thrombi (+) Medical history of previous TE events in the absence of other demonstrable etiologies ANTS 1999;68:799
34
RESULTS In-hospital Mortality ; 2.7% (2/75) 73 survivors were followed for 30±13 mo (12-56) ANTS 1999;68:799
35
Cardiac Rhythms in the Latest F-U NSR 66 / 73 (90 %) NSR 66 / 73 (90 %) w/o drug therapy 60 (82 %) w/ addition of one drug 6 (8 %) AF 3 / 73 (4 %) AF 3 / 73 (4 %) JR 2 / 73 (3 %) JR 2 / 73 (3 %) PM implantation 2 / 73 (3 %) PM implantation 2 / 73 (3 %) ANTS 1999;68:799
36
Follow-Up TTE 66 pts w/ NSR RA contractility (+) : 66 / 66 (100 %) LA contractility (+) : 41 / 66 (62 %)* LA contractility (+) : 41 / 66 (62 %)* Restoration of RA contractility : 69±93 days Restoration of LA contractility :126±136 days* Restoration of LA contractility :126±136 days* * * p < 0.05 ANTS 1999;68:799
37
Factors Predisposing to Persisting AF Factors NSR (n=66) AF (n=3) p-value (univariate) Age (>60 yrs) 13.6 % 33.3 % ns AF Duration (>60 Mo) 40.9 % 100.0 % ns LAD (>55 mm) 63.1 % 66.7 % ns LVEDD (>55 mm) 36.9 % 33.3 % ns EF (<45 %) 23.1 % 33.3 % ns
38
Factors Affecting Recovery of LA Contractility Factors LA(+) LA(-) p-value Factors LA(+) LA(-) p-value Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate Age (<60 yrs) 87.5% 92.3% NS Duration of AF (<60 mo) 75.0% 42.3% 0.001 0.01 LAD (<55 mm) 41.0 % 38.5 % NS EF (>45 %) 74.4% 80.8% NS mPAP (<20 mmHg) 19.0% 14.3% NS C.I. (>2.0 L/min/m2) 72.4% 37.5% NS RA contractility (<60 d) 75.0% 37.5% 0.032 < 0.01
39
Non-redo vs. Redo OHS Non-redo Redo p-value Non-redo Redo p-value AF duration (Mo) 52±57 132±91 <0.01 ACC time (min) 154±45 137±32 ns CPB time (min) 250±69 258±95 ns C-tube drain (ml) 985±669 822±261 ns Bleeding reop 3 1 ns Conversion rate (%) 90 92 ns
40
Conclusions CM-III for AF asso w/ RMVD demonstrated a high sinus conversion rate & recovery of atrial contractility LA contractility is restored significantly later & a lower rate than RA contractility in RMVD CM-III can be performed in redo op w/ comparable sinus conversion rate & acceptable op risk ANTS 1999;68:799
41
Restoration of Atrial Mechanical Function After Maze Operation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease Kim Y-J, Sohn D-W, et al Am Heart J 1998;136:1070-4
42
METHODS 32 pts w/ the Maze procedure SR was restored in 81 % (26/32) By surgery alone in 69 % (22/32) By the addition of one drug in 13% (4/32) Of the remaining 6 pts, Four (13%, 4/32) pts ; paroxysmal AF despite antiarrhythmic therapy One ; sustained AF One ; permanent PM insertion d/t SSS Am Heart J 1998;136:1070
43
RESULTS RA function (+) ; 30 / 30 pts w/ SR or paroxysmal AF LA function (+) ; 19 / 30 pts (63 %) Am Heart J 1998;136:1070
44
RESULTS Peak A velocity & A/E ratio of mitral inflow in pts w/ restored LA function, were significantly lower than in the 16 post-op control pts (p<0.01). Am Heart J 1998;136:1070
45
RESULTS In pts w/ LA mechanical function, duration of AF was significantly shorter than in pts w/o LA mechanical function (1.9±2.9 vs 7.1±3.0 yrs, p<0.01), but there were no significant differences in LA size & volume. Am Heart J 1998;136:1070
46
Surgical Outcome of Maze Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation in Mitral Valve Disease: Rheumatic versus Degenerative JW Lee,et al. STS meeting, 2002
47
Group R (n=86) : Rheumatic Group D (n=43) : Degenerative Study interval : Immediate postop 3 Mo 6 Mo
48
Sinus Conversion Rate (%) P >0.05 P < 0.05
49
Impact of the Maze Procedure on the Stroke Rate in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Cox JL, et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:833-40
50
Methods Sept 1987 - March 1999 306 pts w/ the maze procedure paroxysmal (intermittent) AF ; 61 % chronic (continuous) AF ; 39 % chronic (continuous) AF ; 39 % JTCVS 1999;188:833
51
Peri-op Stroke Rates for the Major Categories of Cardiac Surgical Procedures 5.90 % 5.00 % 4.53 % 4.24 % 3.30 % 3.26 % 2.96 % 2.44 % 0.65 % 1.73 % 1.73 % 1.60 % 1.60 % 1.41 % 1.41 % 1.51 % 1.51 % 1.45 % 1.45 % 0.98 % 0.98 % 1.23 % 1.23 % 0.75 % 0.75 % 0 % 0 % 4.17 % 3.40 % 3.12 % 2.73 % 1.85 % 2.28 % 1.73 % 1.69 % 0.65 % CABG + MVR CABG + AVR CABG + MV repair AVR + MVR MV repair MVRAVRCABG Maze ± other % total stroke % transient % transient stroke stroke % permanent stroke Procedures
52
Whether should the pts w/o LA contractile function after the maze undergo anticoagulation? Normal RA function & normal RA-RV synchrony Normal right-sided CO that is delivered to left side of heart through pulmonary circulation No difference whether LA is contracting (in the presence of normal LV) because LV will immediately adapt to normal right-sided output that has just been delivered to it Normal LA inflow volume, regular LV filling, & no LAA to serve as a nidus for thrombus formation There is no reason to suspect that systemic TE would be any higher in these pts than those w/ demonstrable LA contraction JTCVS 1999;188:833
53
When properly performed, the results w/ this combined approach have been excellent, w/ no increase in periop morbidity or op mortality & w/ documented long-term advantages over simply leaving pts in AF. James L. Cox - James L. Cox J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:212 EPILOGUE
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.