Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlvin Neal Modified over 9 years ago
1
Nathaniel Marchetti, DO Temple University Philadelphia, PA
2
The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT)
3
NETT Productivity >75 peer reviewed publications using NETT data Who should and should not have LVRS? What did we learn about emphysema? Pathobiology of emphysema Genetics Role of hyperinflation Hemodynamics in advanced emphysema Measurements of lung function in severe empysema Racial differences in severe emphysema Mortality in emphysema Medical therapy in severe emphysema Oxygen use in severe emphysema Criner et al, AJRCCM, 2011
4
NETT Design 17 clinical centers Randomized 1,218 patients to medical therapy or medical therapy plus LVRS Screened 3,777 Pulmonary function FEV 1 15% to 45% TLC >105% RV > 150% No significant cardiac disease or pulmonary HTN No other pulmonary diseases present Bilateral emphysema amenable to LVRS Upper lobe predominant Diffuse NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
5
NETT Design Pulmonary rehab 16-20 sessions pre-randomization 10 sessions post-randomization Long term maintenance Aggressive bronchodilator therapy Surgical therapy Bilateral stapled resection of 25-30% of lung Median sternotomy at 8 centers VATS at 3 centers 6 centers randomized to MS vs VATS NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
6
NETT Design Anesthesia Intra-operative care standardized Median sternotomy patient has epidural catheters Extubation within 2 hours Physical therapy started on 1 st post-op day NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
7
Outcomes Primary Survival 10 W improvement on CPET Secondary Quality of life Cost effectiveness Pulmonary function CT scans and nuclear perfusion scans Oxygen requirement 6 minute walk distance Cardiovascular measures (echo) NETT Research Group Chest, 1999
8
Survival Surgical 90-day mortality = 7.9% Medical 90-day mortality = 1.3% NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
9
Survival Surgical 30-day mortality = 16% Medical 30-day mortality = 0% High risk group FEV 1 < 20% predicted + Either D L CO < 20% or homogeneous emphysema NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
10
Survival excluding high risk Surgical 30-day mortality = 2.2% Medical 30-day mortality = 0.2% NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
11
Survival UL and low exercise = YESUL and high exercise = NO NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
12
Survival Non-UL and low exercise = NONon-UL and high exercise = NO NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
13
Exercise performance all patients 10 watt improvement MonthsLVRSMedical Rxp value 628%4%<0.001 1222%5%<0.001 2415%3%<0.001 NETT Research Group NEJM, 2003
14
Durability of LVRS High risk patients excluded Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
15
Durability of LVRS Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006 UL/Low ExerciseUL/high Exercise
16
Durability of Exercise UL/Low UL/High Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
17
Quality of Life Durability MCID for SGRQ is -4 but a priori was -8 for NETT Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
18
P a O 2 Following LVRS Snyder et al, AJRCCM 2008
19
O 2 needs following LVRS Snyder et al, AJRCCM 2008
20
LVRS Enhances CO 2 Elimination During Exercise Criner et al, Chest 2009 Sub-study CPET with a-line (n=47)
21
LVRS Improves f/V T Index Criner et al, Chest 2009
22
LVRS Reduces Exacerbations Washko et al, AJRCCM 2008 Surgical 0.27 exacerbations/patient-year Medical 0.37 exacerbations/patient-year 30% reduction (13-48%, p=0.0005)
23
Most important lessons from NETT? LVRS works!! Interventions to improve survival Smoking cessation Oxygen LVRS LVRS improves Oxygenation and oxygen requirements Favorable alters breathing patterns Reduces exacerbations
24
Who should not get surgery? NETT Research Group NEJM, 2001
25
Who should not have LVRS? Criner et al, PATS 2008
26
Durability of non-UL/high exercise Naunheim et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
27
Who should not have LVRS? Criner et al, PATS 2008
28
α-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency 16 patients had severe deficiency (<80 mg/dL) 10 randomized to surgery 7 had upper lobe predominant emphysema Compared to the 6 that had medical Rx LVRS mortality was higher (20% vs 0%) Compared to normal α-1 AT levels Less improvement in exercise Less improvement in FEV 1 response Stoller et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2007
29
What did NETT teach us about surgical techniques?
30
LVRS and Air Leaks 580/608 patients had surgery Air leak data available on 552 90% had air leak in first 30 days Presence of air leak not effected by Surgical approach (VATS vs MS) Use of any buttressing agent (fibrin glue, etc) Stapler brand Intraoperative procedures Pleurodesis Tenting DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
31
Duration Median 7 days DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
32
Consequence of air leak No difference in mortality Longer hospital stay (11.8+6.5 vs 7.6+4.4 d, p=0.0005) Increased pneumonia (20% vs 7.4%) Increased ICU admission (9.3% vs 1.9%) DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
33
Risk Factors Increased risk and duration Lower diffusion capacity (p=0.06) Upper lobe disease (p=0.04) Presence of moderate to severe adhesions (p=0.007) Increased Duration Caucasian race (p<0.0001) Use of inhaled steroid (p=0.004) Lower FEV1 (p=0.0003) DeCamp et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2006
34
Video Assisted Thorascopy (VATS) vs Median Sternotomy (MS) 8 centers used MS 3 used VATS 6 randomized to either Total patients: 359 MS vs 152 VATS Randomized patients: 77 MS vs 71 VATS McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
35
VATS vs MS 30 day mortality 2.8% MS vs 2.0% VATS (p = 0.76) 90 day mortality 5.9% MS vs 4.6% (p = 0.67) No mortality difference for randomized patients Intra-operative hypoxemia more common in VATS (0.8% vs 5.3%) No difference in days with air leak Median hospital LOS of 10 d in MS vs 9 in VATS (p=0.01) Randomized patients: 15d for MS vs 9d for VATS (p<0.001) McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
36
Costs of VATS Compared to MS VATS = MS for outcomes and complications Shorter hospital stay with VATS Less expensive McKenna et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004
37
Pathologic Lessons
38
Thickened Epithelium Smooth Muscle Hypertrophy Inflammation Subepithelial Fibrosis Small Airway Disease in Emphysema?
39
Nature of Small Airway Obstruction in COPD 159 patients across all GOLD stages 59 GOLD III/IV patients from NETT 100 GOLD 0–III patients Measure small airway (<2mm) luminal content and the amount of inflammation in airway Correlated luminal occlusion and airway edema with FEV1 Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
40
Luminal Occlusion Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
41
FEV 1 falls as lumen occludes Hogg et al, NEJM 2004 r = -0.505, p=0.001
42
FEV 1 falls as the airway thickens Hogg et al, NEJM 2004 r = -0.687, p<0.001
43
More inflammatory cells with increasing GOLD stage Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
44
Significance of Small Airway Disease in Emphysema Airway thickening is possibly tissue remodeling Decreased mucociliary clearance leading to obstruction Increased lymphoid follicles possibly secondary to: Repeated infection Bacterial colonization Persistent inflammation may explain the decline in lung function even after smoking cessation All NETT subject non-smokers >6 months Hogg et al, NEJM 2004
45
Decreased Survival with Luminal Occlusion Hogg et al, AJRCCM 2007 OR 3.28, 1.55-6.92; p=0.002
46
Effect of ICS or Oral Steroids No effect on airway thickness or luminal occlusion Less airway associated lymphoid follicles for those on oral steroids Represents decreased adaptive immunity Could this explain increased pneumonia? r = -0.505, p=0.001 Hogg et al, AJRCCM 2007
47
Mortality and Emphysema
48
609 patients in the medical arm of NETT Well characterized Severe disease with high mortality High quality long term follow up Predictors of mortality in severe emphysema Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
49
Mortality in Medical Arm NETT PredictorHRp Age 70-831.64(1.23-2.18)0.001 O 2 use1.46(1.02-2.10)0.04 TLC% 140-2030.68(0.46-1.00)0.05 RV% 262-4121.57(1.03-2.39)0.04 Low Watts CPET1.54(1.17-2.03)0.002 Lower lung pred emphysema 1.74(1.19-2.57)0.005 Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
50
BODE in multivariate model PredictorHRp Age 70-831. 72(1.31-2.26)<0.001 Hb 9.1-13.31.38(1.00-1.89)0.05 RV% 262-4121.48(1.04-2.37)0.03 Low Watts CPET1.48(1.12-1.94)0.006 Lower lung pred emphysema 1.74(1.19-2.57)0.005 D L CO % 6-211.36(1.01-1.84)0.04 BODE 7-101.48(1.07-2.05)0.02 Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
51
Not predictive FEV 1 alone (i.e. not in BODE) Total % of emphysema on CT scan D L CO was weak in multivariate P a O 2 was not predictive while O2 use was Oxygen increases mortality or epimarker of disease severity? LOTT Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2006
52
mBODE Change in COPD Predicts Mortality BODE change in medical and surgical arms NETT Divided group into BODE classes Decrease by 1 No change Increase by 1 Data missing Used to predict death Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
53
Changes in mBODE Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008
54
mBODE Change in Surgical Cohort and Mortality Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008 P<0.01
55
Martinez et al, AJRCCM 2008 P<0.01 HR for Change in mBODE
56
Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) Study Design Multi-center (21) observational study Designed to identify genetic factors associated with COPD Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis to be done Will permit identification of radiographic and clinical phenotypes to be identified Regan et al, COPD 2011
57
COPDGene Study Population 10,000 subjects enrolled with 2/3 non-Hispanic whites and 1/3 African American Enrollment goals were met early Inclusion criteria Self identified as non-Hispanic white or African American Age 45-80 with 10 pack-years smoking history Regan et al, COPD 2011
58
COPDGene Study Population Exclusion criteria Pregnancy due to CT imaging Other lung disease except asthma Prior LVRS or lobectomy Active cancer Suspected lung cancer Metal in the chest Recent AECOPD requiring therapy Recent eye surgery 1 st or 2 nd degree relative already in study History of chest radiation therapy Regan et al, COPD 2011
59
Data Collected Blood for genetic and biomarker analysis Inspiratory and expiratory HRCT scans with sub- millimeter thickness Pre and post bronchodilator spirometry ATS respiratory questionnaire medical history, medications St George’s respiratory questionnaire BMI, blood pressure, oxygen saturation Six minute walk test Regan et al, COPD 2011
60
Analysis HRCT phenotyping Emphysema quantification Gas trapping Airway wall thickness GWAS: look for genes associated with following: COPD status defined by GOLD criteria FEV 1 % as a continuous variable HRCT parameters listed above Regan et al, COPD 2011
61
Epidemiology of COPD
62
GOLD Undefined Subjects Data from 1 st 2,500 subjects 9% of current or ex-smokers with Low FEV 1 but preserved FEV1/FVC ratio GOLD-U has been described previously Stable pattern Associated with increased mortality Associated with significant symptoms COPDGene provided largest database with both clinical and radiographic data Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
63
Comparison of GOLD U to Controls and COPD Cases Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
64
GOLD-U Comparison GOLD-UControlsCOPD Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
65
GOLD-U Predictors Wan et al, AJRCCM 2011
66
Significance of GOLD-U Represents significant # of smokers/ex-smokers Clinical course largely unknown ?progression Are these changes related to obesity alone? BMI contributes but changes in FEV1 are > than previously reported No reduction in FRC compared to smoking controls
67
Early Onset COPD: Differences of Race and Sex First 2,500 subjects only Early onset definition: Age <55 FEV1/FVC < 0.7 FEV1 <50% predicted Comparator group Age >64 FEV1/FVC < 0.7 FEV1 <50% predicted Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
68
Demographic & Clinical Differences Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
69
Multivariate Analysis Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
70
Significance of Findings Early onset COPD is rare African Americans and women disproportionately affected Smoked less Maternal history of COPD is important Genetic follow up studies pending Foreman et al, AJRCCM 2011
71
Racial Differences in Quality of Life in COPDGene Han et al, Chest 2011 African Americans smoked less, were younger but had the same lung function
72
St George Respiratory Questionnaire African Americans had worse SGRQ scores (higher) Han et al, Chest 2011
73
Multivariate Analysis After adjustment for age, sex, pack-years smoking, education level, MMRC dyspnea, 6MWD, and current smoking status no difference in quality of life in those without exacerbations African Americans with history of prior exacerbation (1.887 for every exacerbation, p = 0.006) Han et al, Chest 2011
74
Family History as a Risk for COPD Hersch et al, Chest 2011 COPD >GOLD II
75
Multivariate analysis Controlling for demographics, parental history of smoking, parental history of COPD, childhood ETS Parental history of COPD OR 1.73 (1.36-2.2), p = <0.001 Paternal history COPD 1.66 (1.24-2.22), p = 0.006 Maternal history COPD 1.51 (1.10-2.09), p = 0.011 Hersch et al, Chest 2011
76
Clinical Phenotypes COPD
77
Chronic Bronchitc Phenotype Kim et al, Chest 2011 VariableCB+ (n = 290)CB- (n = 771)P Age62.8 + 8.464.6 + 8.4.002 Smoking, pk-yr57 + 3052 + 250.006 Current smoker %4827<0.001 Men %57500.027 MMRC3 (2-4)2 (1-3)<0.001 SGRQ total49.9 + 19.736.6 + 20<0.001 TLC, L6.30 + 1.505.88 + 1.40.004 FRC, L4.22 + 1.193.92 + 1.28.002 Mean WA%63.2 + 2.962.6 + 3.1.013
78
Chronic Bronchitics and AECOPD Kim et al, Chest 2011
79
Radiographic Features of Frequent Exacerbation Phenotype Han et al, Thorax 2011
80
Frequent vs non-frequent exacerbators Han et al, Thorax 2011
81
Effect of Airway Wall Thickness and % Emphysema on Exacerbations Han et al, Thorax 2011
82
Multivariate Analysis Han et al, Thorax 2011
83
Smoking Related ILD on HRCT Washko et al, NEJM 2011 Ground glass or reticular abnormalities Diffuse centrilobular nodules Non-emphysematous cysts Honeycombing Traction bronchiectasis
84
ILA vs No ILA VariableNo ILA (n = 1361) ILA (n = 194) P Age60 (52-67)64 (56-72)<0.001 BMI27 (24-31)28 (25-33)0.006 Pack-yr smoking40 (29-54)44 (31-63)0.01 GOLD > stage 2 (%)41320.02 Unclassified GOLD %7140.002 % emphysema4.1 (1.3-12.4)3.3 (0.9-9.7)<0.001 TLC, L5.7 (4.8-6.78)5.21(4.38-6.270.004 Washko et al, NEJM 2011
85
Multivariate Analysis Washko et al, NEJM 2011 Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, COPD (except for COPD model)
86
ILA and lower 6MWD Doyle et al, AJRCCM in press
87
Genetics Three genetic loci identified as being associated with COPD susceptibility 4q24 6p21 5q33 Low BMI associated with COPD Pts from Eclipse, Norway-Bergen cohort, NETT and COPDGene Found an association of low BMI in SNP at FTO gene FTO gene has been associated with obesity Wan et al, AJRCMB 2011 Castaldi et al, AJRCMB 2011
88
Summary NETT Most of analysis is done LVRS improves survival, exercise performance, QOL Small airway disease is important even in emphysematous phenotype Use of BODE to track response to therapy COPDGene Most of analysis not yet done Genetics Definition of phenotypes which may lead to better directed Rx Radiographic Chronic bronchitis Smoking related diseases other than COPD exist GOLD U Interstitial changes on CT
89
Conclusion Large multi-centered studies in COPD are feasible and lead to important findings NETT COPDGene ECLIPSE TORCH Continued co-operation amongst investigators will lead to new advances in COPD
90
Severe Emphysema and Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics
91
Hemodynamic Characterization of Severe Emphysema 120 patients in NETT had RHC and multi-gated blood pool radionuclide ventriculography PA mean was 26.3 + 5.2 mm Hg 90.8% of those had PAM >20 Wedge pressure mean was 14.1 + 4.7 mm Hg 61.4% were above 12
92
Correlates to mPAP
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.