1.  Assessment

2.  Objective: To gather a college-wide collection of student oral presentation data from all speech faculty to establish a rubric that can be used for any oral communication discipline.

3.  Purpose of Data Collection: o Meet college-wide Institutional Assessment (Program Learning Outcomes Assessment) goals o Continue providing evidence of student learning

4.  Process for Gathering Data: o Across all 4 campuses o Across all class sections (in class/ online/ hybrid) o Used heaviest weighted speeches

5.  Criteria measured by rubric: o Organizational Pattern o Central Message o Supporting Materials o Language Choice o Delivery Techniques

7.  Levels of Accomplishment:

8.  Results Overview: o Approximately 2,500 Scantrons were returned o Approximately 60% faculty response rate

9. Organizational Pattern Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total1294100%1216100% No Response17613.6%12210.0% MINIMALLY292.2%403.3% PARTIALLY14511.2%14411.8% GENERALLY44034.0% 72.9% 43735.9% 74.8% SIGNIFICANTLY50438.9%47338.9%

10. Central Message Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total1294100%1216100% No Response15311.8%887.2% NOT EXPLICITLY STATED 191.5%332.7% BASICALLY UNDERSTANDABLE 16212.5%21017.3% CLEAR AND CONSISTENT 53141.0% 74.20% 46738.4% 72.80% COMPELLING42933.2%41834.4%

11. Supporting Materials Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total1294100%1216100% No Response14311.1%867.1% MINIMALLY685.3%1088.9% PARTIALLY30023.2%20917.3% GENERALLY39230.3% 60.5% 39532.5% 66.9% SIGNIFICANTLY39130.2%41834.4%

12. Language Choices Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total1294100%1216100% No Response1279.8%756.2% MINIMALLY201.5%221.8% PARTIALLY18414.2%21417.6% GENERALLY62448.2% 74.4% 54845.1% 74.5% SIGNIFICANTLY33926.2%35729.4%

13. Delivery Techniques Non Adjunct Faculty Adjunct Faculty Count % % Total1294100%1216100% No Response1229.4%756.5% UNCOMFORTABLE 786.0%223.8% TENTATIVE27120.9%21421.6% COMFORTABLE49738.4% 63.6% 54842.7% 68.1% POLISHED AND CONFIDENT 32625.2%35725.4%

14. Summary (Level 3 or Higher) Organizational Pattern73.90% Central Message73.50% Supporting Materials63.70% Language Choices74.50% Delivery Techniques65.90%

15.  Outcomes: o Speech rubric established for cross- discipline use o Affirms speech faculty assessment leveling  Next Steps: o Create supporting materials intervention tool to improve student learning o Assess student use of supporting materials in heaviest weighted speech