Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJustin Cameron Modified over 10 years ago
1
F exam 2 F learning in a natural environment F special case... flower learning F odor learning in the proboscis extension reflex F summary PART 4: BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY #19: ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING IN HONEYBEES II
2
F exam 2 F learning in a natural environment F special case... flower learning F odor learning in the proboscis extension reflex F summary PART 4: BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY #19: ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING IN HONEYBEES II
3
Dr. Spence Behmer F Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University F Friday, April 6 th @ 3:30 WHI Auditorium F Grasshoppers and nutritional physiology: from learning to community structure F to supplement your enjoyment or if you can’t make the seminar… literature will be posted F be ready for one bonus question on the final SEMINAR
4
F PER from sucrose contact on proboscis or antennae F reliable in hungry bees F studied in the laboratory F used with odor for conditioning F some simple rules for learning... ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
5
F odor by itself does not elicit PER F classical or Pavlovian conditioning F US = sucrose F UR = PER F CS = odor F training: US + CS F test: CR = PER F bees learn that odor predicts sucrose reward ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
6
F in color experiment F classical or Pavlovian conditioning F US = sucrose F UR = feeding F CS = color F training: US + CS F test: CR = preference F bees learn that color predicts sucrose reward ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
7
F CS ( e.g., color) must precede US (sucrose) ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
8
F CS ( e.g., pattern) must precede US ( e.g., sucrose) F can use 2 CS stimuli = differential conditioning F CS + = paired with US F CS – = not paired with US F CR = shift in preference for either training testing ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
9
F CS ( e.g., odor) must precede US ( e.g., shock) F can use 2 CS stimuli = differential conditioning F CS + = paired with US F CS – = not paired with US F CR = shift in preference for either odor “A” (CS + ) + shock (US) odor “B” (CS – ) flies choice point training testing ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
10
F CS ( e.g., odor) must precede US ( e.g., shock) F timing critical F determine interstimulus interval function ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
11
F interstimulus interval function determination in PER F CS = geraniol odor F US = sucrose F optimal response when CS preceeds US by 2-3s ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
12
F interstimulus interval function determination in PER F similar to color learning in free flying bees F CS = color F US = sucrose F optimal response when CS preceeds US by 2-3s ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
13
F acquisition function determination in PER F how fast do bees learn? F CS = odor F US = sucrose F asymptotic response with 3 trials F excitatory or faciliatory conditioning leads to CR ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
14
F CS as predictor of the absence of US F how does unpaired CS pre-exposure influence CR? F CS = odor F US = sucrose F inhibitory conditioning reduces effect of training F CS is a less reliable predictor of US for the bees ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
15
F differential conditioning in PER F can it be reversed? F CS + = odor A paired F CS – = odor B unpaired F US = sucrose F 1 st generalize to odor, then differentiate with training F CR + & CR – are opposite F reversal training = retrain bees to alternate odors ODOR LEARNING & PROBOSCIS EXTENTION REFLEX
16
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity ANATOMY OF PER
17
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity F e.g., Drosophila ANATOMY OF PER
18
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity F e.g., Drosophila F sensory input ANATOMY OF PER
19
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity F e.g., Drosophila F sensory input F motor output ANATOMY OF PER
20
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity F e.g., Drosophila F sensory input F motor output F processing ANATOMY OF PER
21
F insect brains ~ vertebrate brains F fewer neurons F ~ complexity F e.g., Drosophila F sensory input F motor output F processing F neuropile F cell bodies ANATOMY OF PER
22
F honeybee brain F ~ 10 6 neurons F complex F what neuropiles mediate PER? ANATOMY OF PER
23
F honeybee brain F ~ 10 6 neurons F complex F what neuropiles mediate PER? F CS ANATOMY OF PER
24
F honeybee brain F ~ 10 6 neurons F complex F what neuropiles mediate PER? F CS F US + “VUM” ANATOMY OF PER
25
F honeybee brain F ~ 10 6 neurons F complex F what neuropiles mediate PER? F CS F US F CS + US convergence? ANATOMY OF PER
26
F CS + US convergence? F 3 regions tested using bilateral cooling: F antennal lobe F mushroom body -lobe F mushroom body -lobe ANATOMY OF PER
27
F CS + US convergence? F 3 regions tested using bilateral cooling: F antennal lobe F mushroom body -lobe F mushroom body -lobe ANATOMY OF PER
28
F CS + US convergence? F 3 regions tested using bilateral cooling: F antennal lobe F mushroom body -lobe F mushroom body -lobe F distributed function F MB most critical ANATOMY OF PER
29
F CS + US convergence? F two specific neurons tested for PER functions: F PE1 F VUMmx1 ANATOMY OF PER
30
F CS + US convergence? F PE1 F dye filled ANATOMY OF PER
31
F CS + US convergence? F PE1 F intracellular recordings F reduced response after training ANATOMY OF PER
32
F CS + US convergence? F PE1 F intracellular recordings F qualitative change in response with multiple trials F may be change in PE1 or change in KC input F suggest PE1 involvement in memory acquisition ANATOMY OF PER
33
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F ventral unpaired medial F dye filled F VERY extensive pattern of arborization F all areas of CS & US input ANATOMY OF PER
34
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F intracellular recording F fires in response to sucrose application F triggers neural circuit proboscis extension* ANATOMY OF PER
35
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F substitute sugar with injected current F measurement of PER* F VUMmx1 provides US F current alone does UR F separates sensory from US at neural level ANATOMY OF PER
36
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F intracellular recordings F spikes with forward conditioning only ANATOMY OF PER
37
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F differential conditioning F intracellular recordings F responds to CS + only ANATOMY OF PER
38
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F 1 st order conditioning F train: CS1 (odor A) + US1 (sugar) F test: CS1 CR1 (PER) F 2 nd order conditioning F train: CS2 (odor B) + CS1 (odor A = US2) F test: CS2 CR2 (PER = CR1) ANATOMY OF PER
39
F CS + US convergence? F VUMmx1 F octopamine transmitter F substitute sugar with octopamine injection @ F calyx F antennal lobe F measurement of PER* F VUMmx1 provides US ANATOMY OF PER
40
F learning necessary for survival in nature F several forms of learning F several modalities of learning F rapid learning F permanent memory in 3 trials F temporal requirements of learning critical F waggle dance F integrate stimuli F can learn complex patterns F can learn general environmental features LEARNING IN HONEYBEES: SUMMARY
41
F proboscis extension reflex (PER) F show all features of learning described in vertebrates F temporal requirements of learning F differential conditioning F inhibitory learning F 2 nd order conditioning F structures correlated with learning F mushroom bodies & antennal lobes F neurons correlated with learning F PE1 & VUMmx1 LEARNING IN HONEYBEES: SUMMARY
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.