Download presentation
1
Presented By – Robert G. Burns, PE
NQA – 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR FACILITY APPLICATIONS Presented By – Robert G. Burns, PE 32nd National Energy & Environmental Division Conference in San Antonio , Texas
2
SCOPE NQA – 1 An Historical Perspective NQA – 1 User Community
Scope, Structure and Content Basic, Supplements and Non-mandatory Appendices Slide 2
3
TYPICAL USERS Utilities / Power Generators ASME Section III Users
Department of Energy National Laboratories, Repositories and Fuel Fabrication facilities Trans Alaska Pipeline Offshore Nuclear Power Projects LES Enrichment Project Slide 3
4
PRECURSOR DOCUMENTS FOR DEVELOPING QA REQUIREMENTS FOR NQA-1
Mil - Q-9858 Quality System Mil - I Inspection System Mil - C Calibration System NASA NPC 200-2 BUSHIPS BSI 10CFR50, Appendix B 10 CFR50 Appendix A, Criterion 1 The ASQ NPTC Matrix Initiative Slide 4
5
QUALITY RELATED REGULATIONS, RULES, ORDERS, CODES & STANDARDS
CIVILIAN NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL COMM’L/INTERNATIONAL 10 CFR 50, Appendix B ( NRC Programmatic ) 10CFR50, Part 21 ( Reporting Defects ) 10 CFR50.55 ( Codes & Standards ) R.G. 1.28 ( NRC Adoption of ANSI/ASME Standards) ASME Section III ( BPVC – Nuclear ) ASME NQA-1 ( Quality Program ) 10CFR 830, Subpart A ( Nuclear – Programmatic ) 10CFR820, Appendix A ( Price Anderson) DOE O 414.A ( Quality Assurance ) DOE G ( QA Management System ) DOE G 414.I-1 ( Independent & Management Assessment ) DOE P 450.4 ( Safety Management System ) EPA QA/R-2 ( EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans ) EPA QA/R- 5 QA Project Plans ) ANSI/ASQC E4-1994 ( Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs ) RW-0333P OCRWM-YMP ( Waste Repository QA Program ) ISO ( QA Program ) ISO-14001 ( Environmental Management System ) ASME VIII ( Non-nuclear QA/QC ) Note Adoption / use of an ISO program does not require Certification. Slide 5
6
ASME-American Society of Mechanical Engineers
BRIEF HISTORY OF NQA-1 ANSI ASME-American Society of Mechanical Engineers AIChE -American Institute of Chemical Engineers N45.2 Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants N46.2 QA Program Requirements for Post Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities N Qualification of Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants N Requirements for Collection, Storage and Maintenance of Quality Assurance Records N Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions N Quality Assurance Requirements for the Designof Nuclear Power Plants N Requirements for Auditing of Quality assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants N Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants N Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for NQA WITH 1995(a) ADDENDA QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for NUCLEAR POWER FACILITY APPLICATIONS
7
TITLE 10, APPENDIX B to PART 50
QA AS ESTABLISHED BY REGULATORY RULEMAKING TITLE 10, APPENDIX B to PART 50 Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants & Reprocessing Facilities “ Quality Assurance Comprises All Those Planned and Systematic Actions Necessary to Provide Adequate Confidence That a System, Structure or Component Will Perform Satisfactorily in Service” Quality Assurance includes Quality Control, Which Comprise Those Quality Assurance Actions Related to The Physical Characteristics Of A Material , Structure , Component , or System Which Provides A Means To Control The Quality Of The Material, Structure Component Or System To Predetermined Requirements. Slide 7
8
ESTABLISHED BY REGULATORY RULEMAKING TITLE 10 APPENDIX A TO PART 50
QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY REGULATORY RULEMAKING TITLE 10 APPENDIX A TO PART 50 Criteria 1. – Quality Standards and Records. Structures, Systems , and Components Important To Safety Shall Be Designed, Fabricated, Erected and Tested to Quality Standards Commensurate With The Importance Of The Safety Functions To Be Performed. Where Generally Recognized Codes and Standards Are Used , They Shall Be Identified And Evaluated To Determine The Applicability, Adequacy, And Sufficiency And Shall Be Supplemented Or Modified As Necessary to Assure A Quality Product In Keeping With The Required Safety Function. A Quality Assurance Program Shall be Established And Implemented In Order To Provide Adequate Assurance That These Structure, Systems, And Components Will Satisfactorily Perform Their Safety Functions. Appropriate Records Of The Design,Fabrication, Erection, And Testing Of Systems, Structures And Components Important To Safety Shall Be Maintained By Or Under The Control Of The Nuclear Power Unit Licensee Throughout The Life Of The Unit. Slide 8
9
OTHER DAUGHTER STANDARDS
Incorporated into NQA N Fluid Systems N Packaging & Handling N Housekeeping N Civil / Structural Inspection N Mechanical Equipment Inspection N Hoisting & Rigging N Subsurface Investigations Slide 9
10
NQA STRUCTURE Part I, “Requirements” ( sometimes referred to as “basic requirements”) which coincide with the 18 Criteria contained in 10CFR50, Appendix B. Part II, ”Requirements” ( formerly NQA-2, various daughter standards) Part III, “Non-mandatory Guidance” ( formerly Non-mandatory Appendices to Slide 10
11
DEVELOPMENTAL MILESTONES
Performance Based vs. Compliance Graded Approach Risk Informed Slide 11
12
PERFORMANCE BASED INITIATIVE 1993 SAN DIEGO TASK FORCE FORMED
SEVEN CRITERIA FOR REWRITE OF PART I Is it performance base related Does it contribute to safe/reliable plant ops Is benefit commensurate with implementation cost Is it consistent with current technology and industry maturity Is the level of detail required to achieve desired result Slide 12
13
PERFORMANCE BASED (CONTINUED)
For the intended activity, is this a minimum requirement that applies to all applications Is the requirement stated once and not duplicated Application of these seven criteria were intended to move the focus from “Compliance “ to the verification of the “Attainment of safety and reliability” Slide 13
14
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Performance Based Initiative
PERSPECTIVE ON MISSION Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Industry SAFETY CONSERVATISM COMPLIANCE PAPER TRAIL LICENSABLE LICENSABLE SAFETY FUNCTIONALITY RELIABILITY COMPLIANCE 1993-NQA Committee Performance Based Initiative VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ATTAINMENT OF SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOCUS Slide 14 nqa1.history.4.
15
FUTURE NQA APPLICATIONS
Advanced & Generation IV Reactors Fuel Production Facilities Thermonuclear Power Projects Slide 15
16
Main Committee (35 Members)
NQA COMMITTEE Main Committee (35 Members) SC on Assessment & Verification SC on Waste Management SC on Applications SC on Engineering and Procurement Processes SC on Program Management Processes SC on Interface and Administration
17
FUNCTIONS Maintain the NQA documents
Planning for changes and new documents Balloting changes and new documents Responding to Inquiries Working with Regulators Outreach to Users Balance of Interest Slide 17
18
FEATURES Two meetings a Year Electronic Ballot Process
Member Performance Evaluation Consideration of All positions Open Process Slide 18
19
Presented By – Robert G. Burns, PE
NQA – 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR FACILITY APPLICATIONS Presented By – Robert G. Burns, PE 32nd National Energy & Environmental Division Conference in San Antonio , Texas
20
THINGS YOU WONT FIND IN NQA-1
HELPFUL QA SURVIVAL HINTS
21
AUDIT STRATEGIES PLAN B BE DECEPTIVE PLAN C BE COMPLIANT
PLAN A BE LUCKY PLAN B BE DECEPTIVE PLAN C BE COMPLIANT BEST STRATEGY: ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY - BE ACCOUNTABLE RESPOND IN RELATION TO SEVERITY - MOST CRITICAL-SAFETY - NEXT IS FUNCTIONALITY - LAST IS COSMETIC COMPLIANCE CONTEND INANE FINDINGS- THEY REFLECT BADLY ON THE AUDITOR AND YOU. REMEMBER A NONSENSE FINDING IS OFTEN IMPOSSIBLE TO ANSWER LOGICALLY! Slide 21
22
AUDIT MANAGEMENT PRESENTATIONS LUNCHES & DINNERS FACILITY TOURS
NON-AUDIT DISCUSSIONS FALL-BACK STRATEGY “NEW SYSTEM” “ PLEAD GUILTY TO EASY TO FIX ERRORS” “CONTEND THEN SURRENDER” “ PRAY FINDING TRACKS TO PREVIOUS QA MANAGER” Slide 22
23
QUALITY PROGRAM OR PLAN
SELLING AN NQA QUALITY PROGRAM OR PLAN PLAY CLIENT MUSIC & LYRICS BUILD FLEXIBILITY INTO TEXT – Shall, Should May MAXIMIZE USE OF DIAGRAMS, MAPS, FLOWCHARTS SELL THE PROGRAM AS A PRODUCT IT’S NOT BIBLICAL – Plan for Revision ASSESS EFFECTIVENESS COST TO IMPLEMENT SCHEDULE IMPACT USER BUY-IN DISCIPLINE / ACCOUNTABILITY RESELL THE PROGRAM & Reach Beyond Compliance Slide 23
24
DEVELOPMENT DANGER - THE IMPROVEMENT DEATH SPIRAL
Investigate Plan New Approach Implement New Approach Measure Improvement Modify New Approach Degrade to Original Practice Resume Investigation Find Any Non-Improvement Slide 24
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.