Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamond Parrish Modified over 9 years ago
1
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Maxims of Income Tax Planning McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2
4-2Objectives Explain the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion Describe the four tax planning variables Entity variable Time period variable Jurisdiction variable Character variable Compute an explicit and implicit tax Describe the major tax law doctrines
3
4-3 Tax Avoidance Tax avoidance consists of legitimate means of reducing taxes Tax evasion consists of illegal means of reducing taxes and is a felony offense punishable by severe monetary fines and imprisonment
4
4-4 Tax Planning Variables Tax consequences of a transaction depend on the interaction of four variables The entity variable: Which entity undertakes the transaction? The time period variable: In which tax year does the transaction occur? The jurisdiction variable: In which taxing jurisdiction does the transaction occur? The character variable: What is the tax character of the income from the transaction?
5
4-5 Income Tax Planning - Entity Generally, taxable income is computed under the same rules across business entities However, the tax on business income depends on the difference in tax rates across entities The two taxpaying business entities are individuals and corporations
6
4-6 Income Tax Planning - Entity Individual taxpayers Have a progressive tax rate structure ranging from 10% to 35% Corporate taxpayers Have a progressive tax rate structure ranging from 15% to 39% Both sets of rates are printed on the inside front cover of the text
7
4-7 Tax Rates What is the 2008 tax, marginal rate, and average rate on $250,000 taxable income if: The taxpayer is a single individual? The taxpayer is a corporation? Answer: $68,251 (40,052 +.33 [250,000 – 164,550]; 33% marginal rate; 27.30% average rate $80,750 (22,250 +.39 (250,000 – 100,000); 39% marginal rate; 32.3% average rate
8
4-8 Income Tax Planning – Entity Variable Tax costs decrease (and cash flows increase) when income is generated by an entity subject to a low tax rate When establishing a new business, consider the tax rates paid by the type of business entity See chapter 12: passthrough entity versus corporation
9
4-9 Income Tax Planning – Entity Variable Income shifting Arranging transactions to transfer income from a high tax rate entity to a low tax rate entity Deduction shifting Arranging transactions to transfer deductions from a low tax rate entity to a high tax rate entity After an income or deduction shift, the parties in the aggregate are financially better off by the tax savings from the transaction
10
4-10 Income Tax Planning – Entity Variable Assignment of income doctrine Constraint on income shifting Income must be taxed to the entity that earns it by the sale of goods or performance of services Income generated by capital must be taxed to the entity that owns the capital
11
4-11 Income Tax Planning – Time Period Variable In present value terms, tax costs decrease (and cash flows increase) when a tax cost is deferred until a later taxable year Constrained by: Opportunity costs Tax rate increase
12
4-12 Income Tax Planning – Time Period Variable Opportunity costs Shifting tax costs to a later period may involve postponing a cash inflow to a later period. Thus, the opportunity cost of postponing the cash inflow may exceed the savings from the tax deferral The opportunity cost is the loss of the immediate use of the cash
13
4-13 Income Tax Planning – Time Period Variable Tax rate increase If taxpayers defer the recognition of taxable income to a future year and Congress increases future tax rates, the cost of the rate increase offsets the benefit of the deferral The risk that deferred income will be taxed at a higher rate increases with the length of the deferral period
14
4-14 Income Tax Planning - Opportunity Costs Assume that a taxpayer has a 30% tax rate and uses a 10% discount rate. Compute NPV of the following: Taxpayer receives $100 cash/income and pays tax now NPV = $70 Taxpayer defers the receipt of cash/income by one year NPV = $64 ($70 × 0.909) Taxpayer receives $100 cash but defers recognizing income by one year NPV = $73 ($100 – $27[$30 × 0.909])
15
4-15 Income Tax Planning - Tax Rate Increase Taxpayer receives $100 cash but defers recognizing income by one year. However, Congress increases the tax rate from 30% to 40% next year NPV = $64 ($100 – $36[$40 × 0.909])
16
4-16 Income Tax Planning – Jurisdiction Variable The jurisdiction variable is important because local, state, and foreign tax laws differ Tax costs decrease (and cash flows increase) when income is generated in a jurisdiction with a low tax rate The jurisdiction variable is discussed in Chapter 13
17
4-17 Income Tax Planning – Character Variable The tax character of an income item is determined strictly by law Every income item is characterized as either ordinary income or capital gain Ordinary income is generated from the sale of goods or performance of services in the regular course of business Income generated by investments (interest, dividends, royalties, and rents) is ordinary Capital gains are generated by the sale or exchange of capital assets (defined in Chapter 8)
18
4-18 Income Tax Planning – Character Variable Most types of ordinary income are taxed at regular rates Exceptions to this rule include interest on state and local bonds (tax-exempt for both corporations and individuals) and qualified dividends (taxed at preferential rates for individuals) Capital gains Taxed at preferential rates for individuals Taxed at regular rates for corporations
19
4-19 Income Tax Planning – Character Variable Tax costs decrease (and cash flows increase) when income is taxed at a preferential rate because of its character. Because capital gains are taxed at preferential rates, individuals try to arrange transactions to convert ordinary income to capital gain The Internal Revenue Code contains dozens of provisions that prevent the conversion of ordinary income to capital income
20
4-20 Conflicting Tax Planning Maxims Sometimes, the four tax planning maxims conflict! For example, a transaction that results in tax deferral may cause income to shift to an entity with a higher tax rate Managers should remember that their strategic goal is not tax minimization per se but NPV maximization
21
4-21 Implicit Taxes A reduced before-tax rate of return on a tax-favored investment is called an implicit tax Example: A corporate bond pays 9% and a municipal bond pays 6.3% An investor who purchases the municipal bond incurs a 30% implicit tax (2.7% reduced rate/9%) Investors with marginal rates greater than 30% maximize their after-tax rate of return by purchasing the municipal bond Investors with marginal rates less than 30% maximize their after-tax rate of return by purchasing the corporate bond
22
4-22 Tax Law Doctrines for IRS Challenges The IRS can use three legal doctrines to challenge a tax planning strategy Business purpose doctrine A transaction must have a business purpose other than tax avoidance Substance over form doctrine The IRS can look through legal formalities to determine economic substance Step transaction doctrine The IRS can collapse a series of interdependent transactions into one transaction
23
4-23
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.