1. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 1 ERD WG 7/01/08 ERD TWG Emerging Research Devices Telecon Meeting No. 2 Jim Hutchby - Facilitating Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:00 am – 11:00 Eastern US Time ERD WG Telecon July 1, 2008 Pacific US Central US Eastern US Europe Taiwan Japan/Korea 6am 8am 9am 3pm 9pm 10pm

2. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 2 ERD WG 7/01/08  Hiroyugi AkinagaAIST  Tetsuya AsaiHokkaido U.  Yuji AwanoFujitsu  George BourianoffIntel  Michel BrillouetCEA/LETI  Joe BrewerU. Florida  John CarruthersPSU  Ralph CavinSRC  U-In ChungSamsung  Philippe CoronelST Me  Shamik DasMitre  Erik DeBenedictisSNL  Simon Deleonibus LETI  Kristin De MeyerIMEC  Michael FrankAMD  Christian GamratCEA  Mike GarnerIntel  Dan HammerstromPSU  Wilfried HaenschIBM  Shigenori HayashiMatsushita  Dan HerrIBM  Toshiro HiramotoU. Tokyo  Matsuo HidakaISTEK  Jim HutchbySRC  Yasuo InoueRenesas Tech  Adrian IonescuETH  Kohei ItohKeio U.  Seiichiro KawamuraSelete  Rick KiehlU. Minn  Hiroshi KotakiSharp  Franz KreuplQimonda  Nety KrishnaAMAT  Zoran KrivokapicAMD  Phil KuekesHP  Lou LomeIDA  Hiroshi MizutaU. Southampton  Murali Muraldihar Freescale  Fumiyuki NiheiNEC  Dmitri NikonovIntel  Wei-Xin NiNDL  Yaw ObengNIST  Dave RobertsAir Products  Kaushal SinghAMAT  Kentaro Shibahara Hiroshima U.  Sadas ShankarIntel  Thomas Skotnicki ST Me  Satoshi SugaharaTokyo Tech  Shin-ichi TakagiU. Tokyo  Luan TranMicron  Ken UchidaToshiba  Yasuo WadaWaseda U.  Rainer WaserRWTH A  Franz Widdershoven NXP  Jeff WelserNRI/IBM  Philip WongStanford U.  Kojiro YagamiSony  David YehSRC/TI  In-Seok YeoSamsung  In-K YooSAIT  Peter ZeitzoffFreescale  Yuegang ZhangIntel  Victor ZhirnovSRC Emerging Research Devices Working Group

3. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 3 ERD WG 7/01/08 July 1, 2008 Telecon Meeting - Objectives u Review Agendas for Saturday, July 12, Workshop and Sunday, July 13, ERD WG Meeting. u Decide process for selecting “Beyond CMOS” candidate technology(ies) for enhanced engineering development. u Briefly discuss each of the seven white papers to provide proponents feedback prior to the Workshop.

4. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 4 ERD WG 7/01/08 July 1, 2008 Telecon Meeting - Agenda 9:00 am Check in & review meeting Hutchby Objectives/Agenda 9:10 Review Workshop & ERD WG AgendaHutchby  July 12 Workshop Agenda  July 13 ERD WG Agenda 9:30 Discuss/decide process and voting Hutchby scheme for selecting the “Beyond CMOS” Candidate technology(ies) 10:00Briefly discuss each White PaperHutchby (NEMS, Spin Transfer Torque, Collective Spin Devices, Carbon-based Nanoelectronics, SED/SETs, Atomic Switch, and CMOL)( 8-minute max.) 11:00 Adjourn Meeting

5. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 5 ERD WG 7/01/08 Process Proposed for Selecting “Beyond CMOS” Technology for Enhanced Engineering Development  Receive and evaluate White Papers from Proponents  Conduct an ERD Telecon to briefly review and discuss the White Papers to provide feedback prior to Workshop.  Receive proponent/opponent expert inputs on the candidate technologies on Saturday, July 12.  Select one or two candidate technologies via discussion, majority voting, and forming an approximate consensus on Sunday, July 13.  Report results to IRC on July 14 or 15.  Write a report by August 31.

6. Work in Progress --- Not for Publication 6 ERD WG 7/01/08 Decision Making & Majority Voting Scheme  Each member of ERD WG will be given a maximum of 3 votes to use in voting for their top 3 choices among the candidate technologies (Majority Voting scheme)  Only 0 or 1 vote can be cast for any candidate technology  Member does not have to use all 3 votes, but cannot use more than 3 votes.  All members can participate in the straw vote.  ERD WG members present in the July 12 Workshop & the July 13 FxF meeting will be eligible to vote at July 13 meeting.  The Candidate Technologies will be ordered according to which received the largest number of votes.  Consensus approval will be our goal, but a 75% affirmative vote will be required as a minimum. This is what is meant by the term approximate consensus.