Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EM Congress Sitges 2003 The preparedness and respons to chemical disasters Two studies of general hospitals in the Netherlands.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EM Congress Sitges 2003 The preparedness and respons to chemical disasters Two studies of general hospitals in the Netherlands."— Presentation transcript:

1 EM Congress Sitges 2003 The preparedness and respons to chemical disasters Two studies of general hospitals in the Netherlands

2 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Dr. Jacquo van Remmen, MD., MSc. l “Rijnstate” Hospital, Arnhem, Department for Emergency Medicine l PhD-programm at the University Hospital Utrecht, Departments for Emergency Medicine and Public Health

3 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Introduction l Prevention l Preparedness l Respons l Restoration

4 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Two studies l Preparedness: l The Hospital Disaster Plan (HDP) l Respons: l The Hospital Treatment Capacity (HTC)

5 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Study # 1. The status of the Hospital Disaster Plan in the Netherlands

6 EM Congress Sitges 2003 The Hospital Disaster Plan l 1987: Line of conduct issued by the government l 1992: Law demands an exercised HDP l 1997: Study inquires the status of the HDP among all general hospitals l 2000: Law demands the appointment of a Disaster Manager in the HDP l 2002: Study similar to the study 1997 and looking into the appointment of a Disaster Manager

7 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Materials and Methods l Similar questionnaire as in 1997 l Send to 110 Boards of Directors

8 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questionnaire:

9 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questionnaire: l Most important reason for score less than 5: Financial Time Organizational

10 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questionnaire: l Is there a Disaster Manager appointed? l If so, does he/she have a medical background (physician or nurse)?

11 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questionnaire: l Anonymously filled in l Free communication possible

12 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Materials and Methods l Responding hospitals were grouped after: l Number of beds l Province

13 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Materials and Methods l Average score of the status of the HDP: l addition of all scores l dividing the sum by the number of items

14 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results (R=95%)

15 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results

16 EM Congress Sitges 2003 According to # beds:

17 EM Congress Sitges 2003 According to province:

18 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Appointment Disaster Manager: (only in 2002)

19 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Discussion l Hospitals could freely score themselves: l These results reflect the hospital’s own opinion their HDP-status.

20 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Discussion l A hospital with a HDP but without regular drills and upgrading (score < 5) is not fully prepared to a disaster.

21 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Conclusion l 2002: 24% is fully prepared l in spite of the appointment of a disaster manager l 1997: 41% was fully prepared

22 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Conclusion 1 out of 4 general hospitals in the Netherlands is fully prepared

23 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Study # 2 The Hospital Treatment Capacity (HTC) for casualties exposed to irritant gasses

24 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Hospital Treatment Capacity (HTC): l The number of victims per hour per 100 beds l that can receive adequate treatment l with sufficient equipment l within an exercised HDP (Score=5)

25 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Irritant gases:

26 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Casualties exposed to irritant gases need: l Decontamination l Airway management l Intensive care bed l Mechanical ventilation

27 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Determination:

28 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Materials and Methods l Questionnaire for 110 hospitals l Table-top exercise for 110 hospitals l Visiting the National IC- internetsite of available ventilation beds during 3 months

29 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questionnaire:

30 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Table-top exercise:

31 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Internet site: l July-September 2002 l Daily visit l Potential vacant V-beds l Representing 75% of the total V- beds. l Measuring daily respons of the IC’s (R=62%)

32 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results Questionnaire: (R=95%)

33 EM Congress Sitges 2003 HTC Average Score: Methods + Personnel+ Materials 3,8+3,1+2,2=9,1 9,1/3= 3

34 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results Decontamination: (R=45%)

35 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results Decontamination: l Compared with UK-study: Netherlands 95 % unable UK 90 % unable

36 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results Table-top exercise: (R=70%)

37 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Results Internet-site: (R=62%)

38 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Discussion l HTC average score = 3 l 95% has no complete decontamination equipment l During 24 hrs 1 victim per 300 beds can be treated if HDP = 5 l HTC for casualties exposed to irritant gases = 0,3 %

39 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Discussion l Average stay of IC-patient > 24 hrs l If total IC-beds in the Netherlands is 900 beds: after the first 1h the HTC can be remain 0% for > 24 hrs.

40 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Conclusion l Weakest elements of the HTC for casualties exposed to irritant gases are: Poor preparedness for decontamination Shortage of ventilationbeds

41 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Questions ?

42 EM Congress Sitges 2003 Thank you very much for your attention.


Download ppt "EM Congress Sitges 2003 The preparedness and respons to chemical disasters Two studies of general hospitals in the Netherlands."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google