Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGavin Lyons Modified over 9 years ago
1
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC0000661. Michigan State University designs and establishes FRIB as a DOE Office of Science National User Facility in support of the mission of the Office of Nuclear Physics. Sheng Peng Controls & Computing Department Manager Welcome
2
FRIB Project at MSU Project of $614.5M ($520M DOE, $94.5M MSU) Dec. 2008: DOE selects MSU to establish FRIB June 2009: DOE and MSU sign corresponding cooperative agreement Sept. 2010: CD-1 granted; conceptual design complete & preferred alternatives decided June 2012: CD2/3A pursued; performance baseline & start of conventional facility construction Growth from more than 400 employees today at NSCL, MSU More than 700 registered user at NSCL user group and at FRIB user organization, Slide 2
3
Facility Layout, Slide 3S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
4
FRIB Driver Accelerator Layout Delivers FRIB accelerator as part of a DOE-SC national user facility with high reliability & availability Accelerate ion species up to 238 U with energies of no less than 200 MeV/u Provide beam power up to 400kW Satisfy beam-on-target requirements Energy upgrade by filling vacant slots with 12 SRF cryomodules Maintain ISOL option Upgradable to multiuser simultaneous operation of light/heavy ions with addition of a light-ion injector, Slide 4
5
Installed or close to final installation (EBIT) 0.085 module FY12 0.041 modules RT RFQ MHB Q/A Pilot source ReA3 is a MSU contribution to FRIB ReA3 shares similar technologies as the FRIB driver LINAC ReA3 provides data for the FRIB engineering, commissioning and installation planning, beam physics, and development of the control system ReA3 as FRIB Technology “Prototype”, Slide 5
6
FRIB key facts to controls CW machine with 10.0625MHz main RF clock »Single-shot/pulse mode for commissioning Beam power up to 400kW CW »Machine protection is critical for damage prevention and efficient commissioning Multi-types of particles with different charge states »Physics model Most of the low level devices are network-attached devices or PLC with Ethernet »Large scale of network Fix TPC $614.5M »Controls budget is tight as well. Has to deliver on time/within budget Pre-commissioning Most of the control system has to be ready to support installation and commissioning started mid-2015 CD-4 milestone Whole control system has to be ready to support FRIB operation by 2018 Key Requirements, Slide 6S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
7
Global systems Global timing system Machine protection system Network and computers High level applications Standards Control room applications Physics applications Low level controls Personnel protection system Diagnostics Conventional facility integration Technical Scope, Slide 7S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
8
Scale It is a large scale distributed control system ~200m * 200m physical distribution ~150 Computers/EPICS Input/Output Controllers (IOC) ~100 Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) Thousands of network attached intelligent devices »RF controller »Power supply controller »Vacuum gauge/pump controller »Programmable logic controller ~ 3000 network ports >500 timing drop points ~2000 MPS fast protection inputs ~646 racks and more than 100 with controls devices, Slide 8S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
9
Naming convention is establish FRIB, NSCL beamline and ReA3 all follow the same naming convention RDB will force the name convention MySQL is selected as FRIB standard RDBMS XAL is selected as FRIB physics online modeling platform CSS is selected as FRIB standard framework of control room applications GUI standard is established SOA –Service Oriented Architecture is preferred SCM standard is established RT, Mercurial, Jenkins, Mantis Technical Status for Software Standard, Slide 9S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
10
High Level Applications deliverables are identified and reviewed Database schema (IRMIS-like) is under development CSS development and collaboration E-log plugin Scan user interface E-log is online and has been using in ReA3 E-traveler prototype will soon be given to user Technical Status for High Level Applications, Slide 10S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
11
Physics applications deliverables are identified and reviewed XAL is adopted and built The hardware representation and online model for electrostatic quads are added XAL configuration files for FRIB Linac and ReA3 are generated Benchmarking is going on against off line modeling tool Technical Status for Physics Applications, Slide 11S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16 FRIB Segment1 to Stripper Energy Gain LB Source to Diagnostics Box2
12
Present the current status of database related design and development (architecture, schema, lattice/model, service and applications) from both FRIB and BNL Evaluate if the architecture meets both labs’ requirements Review the current schema (IRMIS-like) design for FRIB to establish a good starting point for whole HLA/Physics Apps Identify the common interest between FRIB and NSLS II Try to establish a plan for further collaboration Goal of this workshop, Slide 12S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.