1. Changing Prospects: eHealth to improve supportive care for cancer patients. Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw and Nelly van Uden-Kraan VU University, Clinical Psychology VU University Medical Center, Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery

2. Cancer: incidence and prevalence Incidence: almost 100.000 new cases per year age:70 % older than 60 years 20 % between 45 and 60 years 9 % younger than 45 years 1 % younger than 15 years Survival: about 60%, dependent on type and stage of disease Prevalence: 650.000 patients living with cancer (estimation) iknl.nl

3. Increase in the number of cancer survivors Earlier diagnosis, Improved therapies Greater emphasis on quantity AND quantity of life Cancer is seen as a chronic disease at least for some types of cancer as breast, prostate cancer in an early stage Burden on health care delivery systems » Innovation of our care delivery models in general » Focus on cost in relation to quality of care Current focus on cancer survivorship

4. Cancer Care Pathways DiagnosisTreatment Recovery and adjustment Long term monitoring Early monitoring illness End of life care

5. Cancer Care Pathways: examples Breast Prostate Lung Head and Neck Melanoma Colo- rectal …..and more

6. Breast Prostate Lung Head and Neck Melanoma Colo- rectal     …..and more OncoKompas

7. Head Matters: Guided self-help exercises during radiotherapy to prevent speech and swallowing problems Ingrid Cnossen

8. Selfmanagement portal for larygectomized patients

9. Stepped care targeting anxiety and depression Stap 1: Stap 2: Stap 3: Stap 4: Watchful waiting Zelf-hulp Gesprekstherapie Psycholoog en/of Internet / boekje verpleegkundige antidepressiva Voorbeeld van aantal patienten in: 100 7035 15 (hersteld) uit: 30 35 20 Week 0 2 7 12 Anne-Marie Krebber

10. Head Lines: Guided self-help targeting anxiety and depression

11. Screening / monitoring quality of life in clinical practice

12. 12

13. Participatory design approach 13 Needs assessment among patients and care providers User performance and satisfaction Cognitive walkthrough by experts Feasibility study (Cost)effectiveness Implementation study Designing program Usability testing Effect evaluation Development cycle Studies

14. Development cycle OncoKompas Step 1: Qualitative needs assessment patients (N=30) Step 2: Qualitative needs assessment multidisciplinary oncology team (N=11) OncoKompas prototype (OncoKompas 0.1) Step 4: Usability study among HNC patients (N=18) Step 5: Cognitive walkthrough care professionals (N=21) OncoKompas 1.0 Step 6: Feasibility study among HNC patients (N=61) 14

15. 15

17. 17

18. constipation diarrhea nausea or vomiting lack of appetite swallowing speech mouth functioning shoulder functioning ENTspecifictumor loss of taste or smell hearing dyspnea lymphoma

21. 21

22. 22

26. 26

27. Feasibility study (1) Aim multi-centre pilot study To assess feasibility of OncoKompas in clinical practice in patients with head and neck cancer Study design Baseline measurement OncoKompas is made ​​ available to patients at the VUmc, LUMC and Maastricht UMC Quantitative (satisfaction) survey Participants (N=61) 36 men and 25 women Average age: 58 years (24-73 years) 27

28. Feasibility study (2) Mean OncoKompas score: 7 (1-10 scale) Positive findings 75% would recommend OncoKompas to fellow patients 80% could easily find relevant information in OncoKompas >60% satisfied with the supportive care options offered Considerations 35% indicated that certain questions were difficult to answer 31% felt that going through the OncoKompas took too much time OncoKompas should be made available on a tablet 28

29. Up-dating OncoKompas Adding tumor specific modules Development of new functionalities (e.g. zip code specification) Optimizing OncoKompasUpcoming studies 29 Needs assessment among patients and care providers User performance and satisfaction Cognitive walkthrough by experts Feasibility study (Cost)effectiveness Implementation study

30. Contact informationQuestions Nelly van Uden cf.vanuden@vumc.nl www.oncokompas.nl