1. TCS A1: Strategic Information Culture Carrier in Theoretical Computer Science Training PhD:s for industry Backbone of CS Engineering program Algorithms and Complexity Computer and Information Security and Safety Language Technology Uncertainty management Following both CUDOS (Merton) and PLACE (Ziman) Ethoses

2. Foundational studies Algorithms and complexity: Can computation problem P be solved efficiently? If so, how? If not, can it be solved efficiently with high probability, approximatetly correct, etc.? How to prove that it can’t? Cryptography and information security: Can I prove that electronic voting results are correct without revealing individual votes? Similar in auctions. Program safety and security: rapid formal verification, theory of testing Uncertainty and Language technology

3. Utility-driven research Software security (EU S3MS, 4WARD) Program analysis and testing Software safety Language tools: anonymization of public documents, Swedish and minority languages Realistic decision support: CC/psychiatry/primary health care Effects-Based operations

4. Strategic Impact Trained PhD:s (many with postdocs at MIT, ETH,..) at Saab, Ericsson, Swedish Defense, Ernest&Young, Cinnober Financial Technology, Nasdaq Omx Spotify, Google, scholars at KTH, UU, MHD, Imperial College, Cornell university, 200 Master’s theses since year 2003: trained CS engineers everywhere. Spectacular performances can recruit good students: Cipher Challenge, ACM ICPC, 24-hour Extreme Challenge Security: exploitable technology area

5. Some results: Per Austrin: Towards sharp inapproximability for any 2- CSP, FOCS 2007 (Machtey Award) Mika Cohen, Mads Dam: A Complete axiomatization of Knowledge and Cryptography, LICS 2007 Jakob Nordström: Narrow proofs may be spacious: separating space and width in resolution, STOC 2006 (Lewin best student papers award) Douglas Wikström: A sender-verifiable mix-net and a new proof of a shuffle (ASIACRYPT 2005) (author got an Ingvar Carlsson award in 2007) Torbjörn Granlund: GMP: Code for multiple precision arithmetic on most of the worlds computers.

6. SWOC Strength: Competence, reputation, breadth Weakness: Financing, KTH organization Opportunity: Regroup around security and safety issues, competitive Master’s programs in theory/security/software Challenge/threat: Little CSC involvment in KTH strategic discussions, student recruitment, PhD student financing, inappropriate KTH organization.

7. SWOC Strength: Competence, reputation, breadth Competence: Four (and more coming) full professors, five Docents Reputation: Membership in International panels: Gödel, Nevanlinna prizes, University, department and research proposal/program evaluations, selections and promotions. Best (Swedish) engineering teacher prize. Breadth: Spans discrete math/complexity/logic/automata/semantics/inference/ statistics/…

8. SWOC Strength: Competence, reputation, breadth Weakness: Financing, KTH organization Financing from internal faculty grants and Swedish research councils have decreased dramatically. Alternative financing (Vinnova, Vårdal) is random, and no feedback to applicants is typically given. It is not completely obvious that the KTH organization of ICT/CS is appropriate.

9. SWOC Strength: Competence, reputation, breadth Weakness: Financing, KTH organization Opportunity: Regroup around security and safety issues, competitive Master’s programs in theory/security/software. Work has just started.

10. SWOC Strength: Competence, reputation, breadth Weakness: Financing, KTH organization Opportunity: security and safety issues, competitive Master’s programs Challenge/threat: Little CSC involvement in KTH strategic discussions, student recruitment, PhD student financing, inappropriate KTH organization.