1. Role of the Certified Laboratory What really happens when you drop off a sample at a VAP certified lab, and why it is important for CPs to know Kevin Shoemaker Astrea Taylor Opal Johnson

2. Next Phase of the Project Life Cycle 1.PLANNING: 2.SAMPLING: 3.ASSESSMENT: 4.EVALUATION: Plan for data collection using the DQO process Collect data using a SAP and FSOPs Verify that data meets DQOs Make data-based project decisions

3. VAP CL Rule  Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-300-04

4. Labs are certified for:  Specific methods, analytes, and parameter groups. A CP is expected to check with the certified lab to determine which analytes, parameter groups, and methods they’re currently certified for prior to conducting sampling at a voluntary action property. Check with CLs to ensure adequate sample volumes / amounts are sent for analysis. Current CL certificates are located on VAP’s website: http://epa.ohio.gov/derr/vap/pro_lab/labs.aspx

5. Detection Limits  Certified laboratories may not be able to meet the detection limit(s) a CP requires to determine if applicable standards are met.  CPs are expected to check with the certified lab about the detection limits the lab can achieve for various analytes, parameter groups, and methods.

6. Performance Evaluations (PEs) & CL Audits  Periodic PEs are no longer used to monitor performance of CLs. PEs are only required for laboratories applying for initial or additional certification.  System audits are used to evaluate qualifications of labs applying for initial or additional certification.  Compliance audits are used to monitor CL performance. These audits are conducted at a frequency determined by the Agency.

7. Analytical Methods CLs can Use  Methods published or endorsed by U.S. EPA  Performance-based methods are permitted when a USEPA method does not exist for an analyte or parameter group.  Asbestos must be accredited by either: ‒American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), or ‒National Institute of Standards and Testing, National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST NVLAP)

8. From the field to the lab Photos: www.coleman.com; www.labs.gosh.nhs.uk

9. Sample delivery: Shipping Ask the lab which method they prefer – Find out about Saturday delivery Downsides of shipping: – Delayed or lost coolers – Sample temperatures may change – Lab staff may get overwhelmed Up to 40 or more coolers per day – Rush samples may not get logged in ASAP – Hold time concern

10. Sample delivery: Drop-off Drop-off or Courier service to the CL – Elevated / frozen temperatures aren’t an issue if samples were taken from the field that day and iced – Less risk of cooler loss or delayed shipment – Samples are more likely to get logged in that day instead of next day – May be able to get samples analyzed that night or first thing in the morning – Short hold times are less likely to expire – Courier may be able to answer questions or provide missing info

11. Log-in Department Receive coolers, triage, unpack samples – Coolers marked with short-holds and rush are prioritized – Short-holds and rush samples may be taken by analysts (label samples correctly) Variety of knowledge, experience, education, training Connection between samples and Project Manager

12. Cooler / Sample Receipt Form Log-in fills out form, noting – Method of delivery – Date and time received – Presence / absence of ice – Status of ice – Temperature of samples 4.0 ± 2 °C is acceptable unless samples were taken that day (with the exception of air and metals)

13. Cooler / Sample Receipt Form Detail any problems – sample breakage, unlabeled samples, mislabeled samples, times on COC and samples not matching, elevated temperatures, missing samples, preservative problems, unlabeled trip blanks, etc. Scanned with chain of custody Part of NFA package, public record CP acting with care and diligence

21. Next Steps Samples are logged in and labeled Chain of custody, sample receipt form, and log-in sheet given to Project Manager – Reviews sheets – Makes corrections – Communicates with CP if there are problems – Sets samples to available so the lab can batch and analyze them (some LIMS systems) – Tells analysts about rush samples

22. More Communication You can request copies of the log-in sheets, chain of custody, and the cooler / sample receipt form from the Lab Project Manager – Be aware of cooler or sample problems – Potentially catch mistakes – Double check field and lab personnel – Trust, but verify the CLs

23. Lab Analysis

24. Laboratory = Black Box Certified Professional sends in cooler of samples Waits a period of time for results How does a CP know the numbers are correct?

25. The Goal…. Laboratory results that meet the established DQOs. Laboratory results that meet OhioVAP requirements = Affidavit

26. Starting with Set-Up: LIMS Projects can be setup in the LIMs prior to project set-up. Quotes can be sent to the client for PRE-approval – listing methods, RLs, pricing, contact information Many laboratory LIMs system has the ability for the client to access data and get information “real-time” – online data tools where access can be customized by person (e.g. accounting, project manager, field personnel)

27. Project Team Sales/PM = Quote Bottle/Cooler shipment Field Services/Courier Kick-off Meeting Communication update Final Report Follow-up and closure

29. Need to insert clean copy of COC that is landscaped

30. Laboratory = Provides Result Consultant = Doctor, evaluates results

31. Quality Control (QC) Batch The QC batch consists of a set of up to 20 field samples that are processed utilizing the same procedures, reagents, and standards within the same time period. Minimum of a Blank and LCS. MS/MSDs are generally client specified.

32. Method Blank Blank matrix processed under the same time frame, under the same conditions, and utilizing all of the steps of the analytical process. No detectable hits above the reporting limit (RL)  IF samples are “ND”, can be narrated  Otherwise, batch must be redone

33. Blanks and More Blanks… Lab Method – method check (batch) Storage/refrigerator – lab storage area (voc) Instrument – reagent & instrument check (CCB) Field Trip – bottles & shipment (lab DI water) Field – sampling environment (opened in field) Equipment – sampling equipment

34. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Blank spike with a known amount of analyte(s) processed under the same time frame, under the same conditions, utilizing all steps of the analytical process as the native sample. Demonstrates that the batch was processed within accuracy range set by the method

35. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The LCS gives indication of performance. If LCS fails low, the system may have a negative bias. Corrective action is required & the batch needs re-extraction. If LCS fails high, the system likely has a positive bias. Batch may be acceptable if associated samples are “clean” = ND. The LCS surrogate must also be evaluated under the same guidelines.

36. Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSDs) MS/MSDs are performed per batch where applicable The information is only applicable to the actual sample spike Does not control the batch Corrective action generally not performed If client specific MS/MSD is NOT assigned, batch MS/MSD will likely NOT be reported

37. Surrogates Surrogates are compounds that are similar in composition but not normally found in environmental samples. Surrogates are added to organic samples and associated QC samples. Gives an indication of any matrix effect or preparation accuracy especially in QC samples Surrogate failure can give information on bias and c/a is specific to the sample and not the entire batch

38. Example QC Report

39. Field QC Sample Duplicate – field duplicate or second aliquot of sample Matrix Spike – field spiked sample Field Blank – known blank sample Split Sample – subset/percentage to another laboratory

40. Internal Standards (IS) Internal Standards are to added to samples, blank and calibration standards The IS is used to verify instrument response, retention time, the analyte signal to the IS, and corrects for the loss of analyte Determines instrument performance during sample analysis Gives an indication of matrix effects on the individual sample Control – area counts should be between 50 to 200%. If internal standard response changes by a factor of 2 (-50% to +100%) – corrective action is required

41. Quantitation Limit – QL, PQL, RL The quantitation limit (QL), practical quantitation limit (PQL), or reporting limit (RL) is generally calculated as 3-5x the MDL. It is the lowest point at which quantitatively a substance can be measured. It is generally at the lowest point or the 2 nd lowest point of the calibration curve.

42. Method Detection Limit (MDL) An MDL is the minimum amount of a substance that can be measured with a specific degree of confidence that the amount is greater than zero by using a specific method. The MDL represents a range where qualitative detection occurs using a specific method. Quantitative results are NOT produced in this range. The procedure includes all steps of prep and analysis Results reported between the MDL and PQL must be flagged as estimated results

43. LOD and LOQ Relationship The limit of detection (LOD) is defined as 3x the standard deviation of the blank The limit of quantification (LOQ) is defined as 10x the standard deviation of the blank. The probability of false positive is relatively small (~1%) at the LOD Sometimes the LOD and MDL are defined as the same

44. LOD and LOQ Relationship

45. Factors that Impact the RL Dilutions Matrix Dry Weight Prep Methods Target Analytes

46. Case Narrative & Cover Letter – end of the journey At the beginning of the report, there may be a cover letter or case narrative outlining the journey your samples took. QC/Batch failures Matrix Issues Reporting Limits Re-extracts Flags are often not defined in narrative, but in a footnote

47. Example cover letter – with client info in the headers and project numbers on company letter head ABC Labs received 2 samples on 01/22/15 for the analyses presented in the following report. There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted in the case narrative. QC data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits except where noted. Signed – your happy project manager

48. Example case narrative – on company letter head and paginated This report in its entirety consists of the documents listed below. All documents contain the ABC Lab’s Work Order Number assigned to this report. Paginated Report including Cover Letter, Case Narrative, Analytical Results, Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports, and copies of the Chain of Custody Documents are supplied with this sample set. Concentrations reported with a J-Flag in the Qualifier Field are values below the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) but greater than the established Method Detection Limit (MDL). Method numbers, unless specified as SM (Standard Methods) or ASTM, are EPA methods. Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request. All results for Solid Samples are reported on an "as received" or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as "dry weight" using the "-dry" designation on the reporting units. ABC Labs holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom of the cover letter that may or may not pertain to this report. The tests performed are certified under the OhioVAP program Any comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below.

49. Real Life Example…..