Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosanna Gray Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Observations (new) and Comparison with one (ours) Exospheric Model F. Leblanc Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS/IPSL
2
2 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS What is new since Boston’s meeting? Mercury’s Sodium Tail Potter et al. (2008)Observations at different TAA Source rate : 1 to 10% of ejected Na from Mercury surface Only particles with more than 3 eV when ejected are populating the tail (+radiation pressure = escape energy) Baumgardner et al. (2008) Observation up to 1400 R M Past evolution of Mercury’s sodium ejection rate Ionization lifetime Modeling of formation of Sodium tail should provide: - Peak of neutral sodium loss rate (max of radiation pressure) - Dynamic evolution of the ejection rate - Measurement of ionization lifetime
3
3 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS What is new since Boston’s meeting? Mercury’s sodium exosphere: Statistical Sample Potter et al. (2006) 6 years of exospheric images Dawn/Dusk asymmetry Dawn brighter than the limb in relation with solar pressure Dusk less bright than the limb without relation with solar pressure High latitude peaks North/South asymmetry: 1/3 of the time with random TAA and solar longitude distributions % of the time with open magnetosphere (IMF) Simultaneous peaks in North and South hemispheres: in relation with high solar pressure (but only 7 cases!)
4
4 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Potter et al. (2007) 6 years of integrated exospheric brightness - Effect of the solar pressure on the measured intensity: Relation between column density and brightness depends on it - Comparison with Smyth & Marconi (1995) : Energy accommodation coefficient β > 0.5 Na atoms interact weakly with the surface
5
5 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS An exospheric model should be able to describe: - Tail formation - Dawn / Dusk asymmetry - Coupling with magnetosphere - Role of solar pressure on exospheric 3D distribution - Role of solar pressure on measured brightness - Variation along Mercury’s year of integrated brightness Leblanc and Johnson (2003) 3D EM, New version: - Ambient / source populations : The surface population is now described in term of binding energy - Potassium species is described Analysis of the dependency of the simulated exosphere with respect to ejection mechanisms (in progress) Comparison with Exospheric Model
6
6 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Ionization loss ionization lifetime Neutral loss Ejection mechanisms Reabsorption Ejection mechanisms Meteoroid gardening Supply rate Meteoroid Supply Supply rate Solar wind implantation: negligible for sodium atoms Magnetospheric recycling: negligible for sodium atoms (Leblanc et al. 2003) Ejection mechanisms: Thermal desorption (Vs temperature and binding energy) Solar wind sputtering (Yield and magnetospheric penetration) Micro-meteoritic vaporization (Flux and vapor temperature) Photo-stimulated desorption (Cross section) Total supply rate : variation with heliocentric distance
7
7 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS First example: Infinite reservoir in surface Thermal desorption Solar Wind sputtering PSD Meteoritic vaporization Magnetospheric sputtering % of exosphere produced by… Average D2 emission brightness (kR) Peak of emissivity Retrograde Sun motion
8
8 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Second Example Role of Thermal desorption Important Negligible
9
9 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Best Comparison with observations (Work in Progress) Respective role of ejection Mechanisms related to surface density variation along Mercury’s year (not shown) % of exosphere produced by…
10
10 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS CONCLUSIONS The 6 years data base of Potter et al. is a very rich source of information The dawn/dusk variation is correctly reproduced The upleg and downleg of Mercury’s orbit are not symmetric and dependent on ejection mechanisms Work in progress to understand the global structure of the measured Emission vs different parameters May be a way to constrain the ejection mechanisms.
11
11 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Comparison with THEMIS
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.