Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEric Cross Modified over 9 years ago
1
ã 2003 L-Soft HTML vs. TEXT DC Web Women “Blacklists, Whitelists and Read All Over” June 17, 2003 Gabriela Linares VP Marketing
2
ã 2003 L-Soft Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954
3
ã 2003 L-Soft Bible StudyBusiness Yes87.1%93.1% Only Partially7.6%4.5% No5.3%2.4% Respondents394468 HTML Readability Today: Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954
4
ã 2003 L-Soft Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954 E-Mail Client Program Casual users: Business users: Outlook Express34% AOL 6.0 to 8.017% Yahoo! Mail13% Outlook 98/2000/XP12% HotMail10% Outlook 98/2000/XP48% Outlook Express27% Eudora11% AOL users: 92% of users studied used version 6.0 and higher and could read HTML e-mail
5
ã 2003 L-Soft Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954
6
ã 2003 L-Soft Bible StudyBusiness Dial-up Access24.1%41.3% Broadband Access20.3%17.3% Plain Text Preference Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954
7
ã 2003 L-Soft
8
Reasons for HTML preference: Readability (78%) Attractive display (68%) Ease of scanning (64%) Overall design (64%) Reasons for text preference: Readability (73%) Security from viruses (68%) Ease of saving for future use (63%) Ease of scanning (61%) Download speed (54%) Industry Research – Study #1 Source: Survey of E-Mail Format Preferences and Programs, Dr. Ralph F. Wilson, April 2003 - N=954
9
ã 2003 L-Soft Poll on HTML vs. Text preference - #2 Readers of “Splash” and “E-zine Tips”, N=600, February 2003
10
ã 2003 L-Soft Reasons for preferring text: Can't read HTML6% Just want the meat without the distractions32% Like to read offline15% Ads are more intrusive in HTML22% Slow to download14% Other11% Reasons for preferring HTML: HTML email can be laid out more effectively28% Color can be used24% Images can be included21% Ads can be more effective in HTML 20% Poll on HTML vs. Text preference - #2 Readers of “Splash” and “E-zine Tips”, N=600, February 2003
11
ã 2003 L-Soft Preferred e-mail advertisement formats worldwide, Q1 2002- #3 Source: Opt-In News, May 2002
12
ã 2003 L-Soft (21%) of consumers use a Spam filter within their email messaging programs. (52%) do not use this type of service and (27%) are uncertain if they are using a filter feature Use of anti-spam filters - #3a Source: Opt-In News, May 2002
13
ã 2003 L-Soft Response rates per format- #4 Source: IMT Strategies, Sept. 2001
14
ã 2003 L-Soft Other Industry Research #5 Source: Debbie Weil, WordBiz Report, N=300, May 2003 One-third publish HTML only Text-only subscribers are typically less than 50% of list recipients 70% survey respondents prefer HTML
15
ã 2003 L-Soft Best practices is a moving target- #6 Source: Jupiter Media Metrix, May 2002 Best practices for campaigns are a moving target, depending on campaign objective. “There is no one best practice for these factors. Only with testing can an e-mail campaign be fully optimized” Audience segmentation, message content and e-mail format should be tested prior to rolling out any campaign
16
ã 2003 L-Soft Anti-Spam filters Spam report from the anti-spam filter product Spam Assassin HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is red HTML_MESSAGE (0.0 points) BODY: HTML included in message HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS (1.1 points) BODY: HTML link text says "CLICK" HTML_FONT_BIG (0.3 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up LINES_OF_YELLING (0.0 points) BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML link text says "click here" HTML_FONT_COLOR_GRAY (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is gray HTML_FONT_COLOR_YELLOW (0.0 points) BODY: HTML font color is yellow
17
ã 2003 L-Soft HTML vs. Text issues Attachments blocked by Anti-Spam & Anti-Virus filters Embedded images are attachments Referencing images from web site does not include attachments A Multi-Part message may include attachments Multipart/Alternative doesn’t have attachment Multipart/Mixed has an attachment Multipart/related has an attachment
18
ã 2003 L-Soft Design preferences Both formats are visually appealing to different groups Both formats are easier to scan according to different groups Format depends on company’s image & personality HTML protocol & e-mail applications’ inconsistencies - AOL Text convenient for those readers that need specific information and don’t care about format HTML vs. Text issues
19
ã 2003 L-Soft Size of message Larger size for HTML than for text only messages HTML with embedded images is larger than with referenced images Slows transmission and download time for dial-up connection users Recommended maximum size of an e-mail message is 15k-20k to not alert mail watcher software HTML vs. Text issues
20
ã 2003 L-Soft Tracking recipient behavior HTML allows for tracking open-ups, click-thrus, frequency, date, time, personal data and demographics Same tracking capabilities available for text messages BUT doesn’t include open-up tracking User reading e-mail online or offline HTML messages with referenced images, will not display correctly when read off-line Network firewalls sometimes strip HTML messages that contain links to outside sources HTML vs. Text issues
21
ã 2003 L-Soft Evaluate options HTML & Text: Offer two separate mailing lists if possible Provide recipient with alternative at registration HTML only Text-only recipients are not reached Test how message is viewed in different e-mail clients Attach images? Or reference web site? Send multi-part messages Providing alternative for those who cannot read html “Sniffing” technology is not an established e-mail protocol therefore is not reliable Text only Reaches entire audience Cut text at 60 characters Message can be creatively designed and easy to scan
22
ã 2003 L-Soft Recommendations 1.There is no right or wrong format 2.Determine internal capacity & needs 3.It is all about your recipients: survey them about desired format 4.Consider ISPs’ anti-virus and anti-spam measures – AOL, MSN, Earthlink measures -- which are DYNAMIC 5.Consider personal anti-spam applications 6.Test, test, test
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.