Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tobacco agent training 2015 Insect management update Hannah Burrack, Jeremy Sloan, and Aurora Toennisson Department of Entomology.

Published byMagdalene Wilson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Tobacco agent training 2015 Insect management update Hannah Burrack, Jeremy Sloan, and Aurora Toennisson Department of Entomology."— Presentation transcript:

1 Tobacco agent training 2015 Insect management update Hannah Burrack, Jeremy Sloan, and Aurora Toennisson Department of Entomology

2 Upcoming pesticide registrations – efficacy and usage Enhancing IPM in tobacco Pesticide label update – Bee boxes and pollinator protection Topics

3 One new pesticide likely to be labeled in 2015 Soil applied, activity against tobacco flea beetle (VG), green peach aphid (G), and TSWV suppression Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials

4 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Similar activity to Admire Pro against tobacco flea beetle

5 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Results in reduction of flea beetle damage

6 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Little activity against tobacco budworm

7 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Little activity against tobacco budworm

8 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Little activity against tobacco budworm

9 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials At transplant soil applications of Coragen not active 6 WAT

10 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials At transplant soil applications of Coragen not active 6 or 7 WAT

11 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Efficacy of foliar treatments against tobacco budworm

12 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Efficacy of foliar treatments against a prolonged tobacco budworm flight

13 Insect management updates Efficacy and new materials Efficacy against hornworms Residual control from earlier treatments?

14 Purpose Quantify benefits of IPM practices in tobacco Identify barriers to IPM adoption by tobacco growers Enhancing IPM in tobacco

15 2014 activities Research station trials Small plot experiments focused on insecticide application frequency and residues On farm trials Large plot experiments focused on comparing IPM recommendations to grower practices Enhancing IPM in tobacco

16 Research station trials Rocky MountKinston TreatmentAverage applicationsAverage fl oz/acre appliedAverage applicationsAverage fl oz/acre applied No insecticide 0000 Admire Pro only (no foliar) 0000 Threshold Coragen 5.0 fl oz 1.57.5 210.0 Scheduled Coragen 7.5 fl oz 215.0 2 Threshold Belt 2.0 fl oz 1.53.0 2.55.0 Scheduled Belt 3.0 fl oz 26.0 39.0

17 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials

18 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials

19 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials

20 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials

21 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Three locations (Stokes, Johnston, Wilson) Grower standard & IPM plots Collected insect data, scouting time, insecticide inputs, yield Shared results weekly via Tobacco Portal

22 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Key results Scouting time averaged 4.4 min/acre Meaning, a grower with 100 acres of tobacco could expect 1 day/week of scouting (7.4 hours) **This may be an overestimate as scouted fields were small**

23 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Key results Pest pressure similar across fields

24 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Key results Pest pressure similar across fields

25 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Key results Yield similar across fields

26 Enhancing IPM in tobacco On farm trials Future directions Expand to more locations—seeking sites in Lee, Moore, Richmond, Scotland, Robeson, Columbus, Granville, Person, or Franklin Counties Refine scouting recommendations

27 We plan to conduct a grower survey at 2015 GAP meetings to refine our understanding of grower- perceived barriers to IPM adoption HELP! Enhancing IPM in tobacco Grower feedback

28 Pesticide labels and pollinator protection Pollinator protection language pre 2014 Remains on labels!

29 Pesticide labels and pollinator protection Pollinator protection language pre 2014

30 Pesticide labels and pollinator protection Appear on Group 4A (neonicotinoid) and some Group 28 labels Will eventually appear on all labels when materials impact pollinators

31 Pesticide labels and pollinator protection Admire Pro No specific pollinator protection restrictions for tobacco Important to note that non crop applications are not allowed unless specified on label!

32 Pesticide labels and pollinator protection What do these label changes mean for tobacco growers? Apply primarily to foliar applications Systemic neonicotinoid applications meet current label restrictions As additional labels are updated, may have greater impact – growers should be aware of precautions and follow best management practices regardless Pollinator Task Force (coordinated through NC Farm Bureau)

33 Interested in learning more? Read us @ tobacco.ces.ncsu.edu Like us @ www.facebook.com/NCSmallFruitIPM Follow us @NCSmallFruitIPM

34 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials Treatment # plots sprayed 17 June # plots sprayed 25 June # plots sprayed 1 July Average TBW- targeting applications/plot Average total fl oz/acre material applied against TBW No insecticide 00000 Admire Pro only (no foliar) 00000 Threshold Coragen 5.0 fl oz 0110.52.5 Scheduled Coragen 7.5 fl oz 40017.5 Threshold Belt 2.0 fl oz 0300.751.5 Scheduled Belt 3.0 fl oz 44013.0 Upper Coastal Plain Research Station, Rocky Mount

35 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials Treatment # plots sprayed 17 June # plots sprayed 25 June # plots sprayed 1 July Average HW-targeting applications/plot Average total fl oz/acre material applied against HW No insecticide 00000 Admire Pro only (no foliar) 00000 Threshold Coragen 5.0 fl oz 04015.0 Scheduled Coragen 7.5 fl oz 00417.5 Threshold Belt 2.0 fl oz 3000.751.5 Scheduled Belt 3.0 fl oz 40013.0 Upper Coastal Plain Research Station, Rocky Mount

36 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials Treatment # plots sprayed 17 June # plots sprayed 25 June Average TBW- targeting applications/plot Average total fl oz/acre material applied against TBW No insecticide 0000 Admire Pro only (no foliar) 0000 Threshold Coragen 5.0 fl oz 44210.0 Scheduled Coragen 7.5 fl oz 4017.5 Threshold Belt 2.0 fl oz 4424.0 Scheduled Belt 3.0 fl oz 4426.0 Lower Coastal Plain Research Station, Kinston

37 Enhancing IPM in tobacco Research station trials Treatment # plots sprayed 17 June # plots sprayed 25 June Average HW- targeting applications/plot Average total fl oz/acre material applied against HW No insecticide 0000 Admire Pro only (no foliar) 0000 Threshold Coragen 5.0 fl oz 0000 Scheduled Coragen 7.5 fl oz 0417.5 Threshold Belt 2.0 fl oz 200.51.0 Scheduled Belt 3.0 fl oz 4013.0 Lower Coastal Plain Research Station, Kinston

Download ppt "Tobacco agent training 2015 Insect management update Hannah Burrack, Jeremy Sloan, and Aurora Toennisson Department of Entomology."

Similar presentations

Interaction of chemigation timings with efficacy of reduced-risk insecticides and An update on West Coast cranberry variety trials and other pest management.

Interaction of chemigation timings with efficacy of reduced-risk insecticides and An update on West Coast cranberry variety trials and other pest management.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability

Looking at Agricultural Sustainability
An Organic Biopesticide for HydroFarm Customers

An Organic Biopesticide for HydroFarm Customers
Strategic pest management tactics for blackheaded fireworm using reduced risked ovicide/larvicide insecticides Kim Patten & Chase Metzger.

Strategic pest management tactics for blackheaded fireworm using reduced risked ovicide/larvicide insecticides Kim Patten & Chase Metzger.
Et maintenant……….. ………… pour la mauvaise nouvelle!

Et maintenant……….. ………… pour la mauvaise nouvelle!
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.

Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
S Concepts of Integrated Pest Management Leonard Coop Assistant Research Professor Oregon State University Integrated Plant Protection Center 2040 Cordley.

S Concepts of Integrated Pest Management Leonard Coop Assistant Research Professor Oregon State University Integrated Plant Protection Center 2040 Cordley.
J. Patrick Jones North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services Structural Pest Control & Pesticides Division.

J. Patrick Jones North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services Structural Pest Control & Pesticides Division.
David Lamm ENTSC Soil Conservationist. Pest Management DEFINITION A site-specific combination of pest prevention, pest avoidance, pest monitoring, and.

David Lamm ENTSC Soil Conservationist. Pest Management DEFINITION A site-specific combination of pest prevention, pest avoidance, pest monitoring, and.
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum Christian Krupke Assistant Professor Field Crops Entomology.

Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum Christian Krupke Assistant Professor Field Crops Entomology.
Insecticidal Control of Caterpillar Pests of Cole Crops Alton N. Sparks, Jr. and David G. Riley, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia INTRODUCTION Cole.

Insecticidal Control of Caterpillar Pests of Cole Crops Alton N. Sparks, Jr. and David G. Riley, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia INTRODUCTION Cole.
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT in PALESTINE. INTRODUCTION - Agriculture sector is considered one of the major productive sector in Palestine. - Scarcity of.

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT in PALESTINE. INTRODUCTION - Agriculture sector is considered one of the major productive sector in Palestine. - Scarcity of.
Developing Sustainable Pest Control Practices Against Major Pests in Papaya in Hawaii Leyla V. Kaufman and Mark G. Wright Department of Plant and Environmental.

Developing Sustainable Pest Control Practices Against Major Pests in Papaya in Hawaii Leyla V. Kaufman and Mark G. Wright Department of Plant and Environmental.
Hands-on IPM Training Through University of Florida Living Extension IPM Field Laboratory Bob Hochmuth, Multi-County Extension Agent Suwannee Valley Agricultural.

Hands-on IPM Training Through University of Florida Living Extension IPM Field Laboratory Bob Hochmuth, Multi-County Extension Agent Suwannee Valley Agricultural.
Department of Entomology Cornell University New York State Agric. Exp. Stn. 630 W. North Street Geneva, NY Department of Entomology Cornell University.

Department of Entomology Cornell University New York State Agric. Exp. Stn. 630 W. North Street Geneva, NY Department of Entomology Cornell University.
1)Expanded registrations of IGR and neonicotinoids: Applaud/Courier : cucurbits, cotton, lettuce Actara/Platinum: cotton, melons, leafy vegetables Assail:

1)Expanded registrations of IGR and neonicotinoids: Applaud/Courier : cucurbits, cotton, lettuce Actara/Platinum: cotton, melons, leafy vegetables Assail:
Demonstration and Evaluation of Integrated Crop Scouting on Pumpkins in Southern NJ Sally Walker Rutgers Cooperative Extension Vegetable IPM Program.

Demonstration and Evaluation of Integrated Crop Scouting on Pumpkins in Southern NJ Sally Walker Rutgers Cooperative Extension Vegetable IPM Program.
Soybean aphid efficacy program update 2011 ICM Conference, Ames Iowa Update on the soybean aphid efficacy program Erin Hodgson and Greg VanNostrand Department.

Soybean aphid efficacy program update 2011 ICM Conference, Ames Iowa Update on the soybean aphid efficacy program Erin Hodgson and Greg VanNostrand Department.
Economic Assessment Of IPM Programs Deana Sexson University of Wisconsin, NPM Program.

Economic Assessment Of IPM Programs Deana Sexson University of Wisconsin, NPM Program.
Oklahoma State University Greenbug Expert System and “Glance ‘N Go” Sampling for Cereal Aphids: Results of Field Testing Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology.

Oklahoma State University Greenbug Expert System and “Glance ‘N Go” Sampling for Cereal Aphids: Results of Field Testing Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google