Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGavin Morton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Understanding the needs of lesbian, gay and bisexual cancer patients and their partners and carers Dr Daniel Saunders Consultant Oncologist Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
2
Overview Why this project? Surveys and data –National/International –NUH Training programme Historical perspective Why equality is not enough?
3
Why this project? New patient seen on 2 Jan 2013 –Gay man with localised prostate cancer –Choices –Info and support available Previous work with GLADD Stonewall leadership programme
4
Data – National/International Limited NHS does not routinely monitor Various ad hoc surveys – possible bias –Stonewall –YouGov National Cancer patient survey
5
Data – NUH LGBT Cancer Survey Pilot at Nottingham Pride Roll-out in cancer-related outpatient areas Wide publicity through local LGBT community
6
Data – Startlingly similar results The Cancer Patient Experience Survey (2013) found differences between LGB&T and heterosexual people relating to comms as well as respect and dignity when receiving cancer treatment. More negative responses were found from LGB&T people in regard to: Doctors and ward nurses never talked in front of patient as if they were not there Never felt treated as a set of cancer symptoms rather than as a whole person Always treated with respect and dignity by hospital staff Hospital staff always did everything they could to control their pain Patient given privacy when discussing condition and treatment, and when examined or treated Doctors/nurses never deliberately did not tell patient things they wanted to know
7
Suggestions for improvement Research has also identified that lesbian, gay and bisexual cancer patients have felt that their treatment could have been improved, by considering their particular needs (to be explored further). Topics include: Environments conducive to ‘coming out’ to health care professionals Including partners and carers Access to relevant support Access to relevant info (assumed heterosexuality and info not tailored to different behaviours etc.)
8
Nottingham data Very similar (Also matched by data from US and Australasia) Two things stand out: –Comments and concerns about primary care –LGBT patients attending consultations on their own
9
NUH LGBT Cancer Training Workshops covering over 200 staff Interactive Excellent feedback Too early to know how much this has changed practice Need to consider how we might extend this to primary care
10
Lone attenders Strikingly different to heterosexual cancer patients We need to understand why: –Fear of homophobic attitude of staff? –“Option” to conceal sexual orientation –Patients not seeing relevance of sexual orientation –Is the fear of homophobia based on recent or past experiences of health care? Brief case study
11
A historical perspective Professor David Harvey Entered clinical training in 1957 Illegal to be gay until 1967 Doctors and medical students faced being struck of by the GMC David achieved great things in his career including becoming Professor of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine at the Hammersmith He was also the Royal Paediatrician for many years including looking after Princes William and Harry He was never afraid to be honest about his sexual orientation
12
Healthcare and “Caring” 1994 – DSM IV(R) removed homosexuality as a classified psychiatric disorder (Robert Cabaj) Electroaversion therapy still available in West Mids in 2001
13
Macmillan Living with Cancer: Focus on Equality project Completed end of November 2014 Significant feedback from LGBT patients about lack of understanding/empathy with their personal situation
14
To empathise with patients you need to move beyond equality
15
Some progress
16
Thank you for helping us to make more progress
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.