1. R EVIEW OF FERTILITY AND AVAILABILITY OF NURSERIES ( WORK IN PROGRESS ) Dorota Szelewa and Hana Haskova

2. Fertility in Visegrad countries before and after 1989 Visegrad countries in the 1980s - permanent childlessness low (5-10%) - mean age of women at first birth low (about 20-22 years) - fertility rates high (about 2 children per woman) Visegrad countries since the 1990s - lowest total fertility rates in Europefertility rates - 1,14 – 1,35 children per woman in 2000 - 1,32 – 1,5 children per woman in 2008 - rapid increase in the mean age of women at birth (28-29 years) - growing percentage of the (so far) childless in adult population How to explain fertility decline in Visegrad countries? What are the factors leading to different fertility outcomes among European countries?

3. back

4. Explanations of fertility decline in Visegrad countries (not mutually exclusive) Cultural factors Structural factors internalized valuesexternal conditions opportunities competing with parenthood barriers to parenthood positive aspects of transformations negative aspects of transformations similarities in demographic trends in Europe differences in demographic trends in Europe delayed second demographic transition demographic shock, human conduct under conditions of anomie, or strategic postponement evidence of growing postmaterialist value orientations evidence of growing insecurity on labour markets and reductions in welfare systems

5. Correlation between total fertility rate and share of children <3 in daycare in Europe (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.65)

6. The development of the nurseries after the fall of state-socialism % children under 3 attending nurseries 19892009 Czech Republic14,0%>1,0% Hungary13,7%11,0% Poland4,0%3,3% Common trend: decentralisation of responsibility for financing and maintaining nurseries (exception: Hungary)

7. Recent reforms/ alternative forms of daycare 2-year olds in kindergarten Private forms of care (e.g. baby-sitters) family day- care-service, integrated nursery- kindergarten, domestic childcare, alternative day- care service Hungary Czech Republic Poland “toddler’s clubs” Nanny

8. Comparative studies Hobson and Oláh (2006): RQ: why delaying birth-giving ? Data: LIS, CZ and HU included dual earner countries (Sen’s capabilities and agency freedom approach) Lowest or none birth-striking effect identified only in the dual earner countries (Sen’s capabilities and agency freedom approach) Oláh (2011): Risk aversion theory For fertility: stronger effects of daycare than part- time work

9. Childcare services De-familialisation of care (Childcare services) PolandPoland Implicit familialism Explicit familialism Optional familialism Female mobilising Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia Minimalist policies Hungary, Lithuania payments De- familialisation of payments for care Estonia, Latvia Szelewa, Polakowski 2007

10. The Czech Republic (1) Lively debate between proponents and oponents of the impact of welfare provisions on fertility. Studies on attitudes to childcare services and financial support for mothers to provide home-based care.

11. The Czech Republic (2) Work situation/ plans increasingly more influence childbearing plans. Conflict between work and childbearing plans highest among university degree women. University degree women and men with the lowest education the most and increasingly more without children in the household. Accessible quality childcare services reduce conflict between work and care in childbearing plans of high educated women.

12. Hungary (1) Gábos and Tóth (2000) Decision about birth-giving – result of cost- benefit rationalisation Kapitány (2008) Small positive impact of GYED Bálint and Köllő (2008) Positive impact of in-kind benefits, but also related to status

13. Hungary (2) Bass and Darvas (2008) Low-educated women prefer home-based care Highest rate of childcare use among well- educated women

14. Poland (1) Institute for Labour and Social Issues 1991 Institute for Labour and Social Issues 1991 Highest fertility among those who came back to work after childcare leave Husband’s earnings (28%), better housing conditions (28%), and higher childcare benefit (21%) Husband’s earnings (28%), better housing conditions (28%), and higher childcare benefit (21%) as most important factors influencing pro-creation decisions

15. Poland (2): LFS module 2005 higher education, higher income bigger cities Use of external care as related to higher education, higher income and bigger cities, Procreation decisions: more emphasis on the availability of childcare services (in general) Birth striking as response to societal and structural changes. Gap: Linking nurseries availability to fertility absent Treating „external care” very generally (including nannies and family members not living in the household.

16. Conclusions in institutional arrangements Differences in institutional arrangements of childcare policies Literature gap Literature gap: need for systematic methodological approach and individual level data. Alternative forms of childcare: challenge for statistics …therefore survey data on the use of childcare might be more adequate.

17. Thank you!