Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRoy Taylor Modified over 9 years ago
1
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division
2
Overview Ammonia gas isn’t ordinary! Monitoring is expensive! How useful are traditional monitoring networks for measuring ammonia?
3
Overview Not examining: –Organizational or infrastructure needs –Spatial design of campaign-style monitoring –Methodology (Mark Sutton) –Covariance of ammonium particulate concentrations (John Walker)
4
Objectives of regional monitoring networks Provide quantifiable estimates of regional concentrations or depositions –Interpolations performed using number of techniques –Concentrations may be used to estimate deposition using inferential models or some other technique –Identify and characterize extent of “hot spots”
5
Objectives of regional monitoring networks Identify and characterize conditions in sensitive areas Estuaries and critical environments Low buffer capacity soils Chemically sensitive atmospheres –Particulate nurseries Understanding atmospheric conditions at existing monitoring stations
6
Optimize measurement methods Known accuracy and precision –Identify acceptable risk of: False negative: Area is identified as not being an area of concern when it is False positive: Area is identified as being an area of concern when it is not Reliable Affordable! –Capital equipment –Labor
7
Optimize monitoring locations Minimize uncertainty as function of cost –Predictive variance over grid –Must have understanding of granularity in concentrations Representative of regional conditions Measurement locations are spatially correlated at scale of interpolation technique
8
What density of measurements do we need? Extremely high spatial variance Concentrations can vary by factor of 100 on spatial scale of 1 km Time to call in the modelers?
9
REMSAD (Regulatory Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition) Three dimensional grid-based Eulerian air quality model. Resample modeled output using monitoring locations from 4 different networks Interpolated re-sampled data using IDW Compared re-sampled interpolations to original output
10
REMSAD 30km Output Interpolated to 10km Grids (2000) Wet NH 4 + Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +)
11
NADP/NTN ~250 mostly rural and isolated sites
12
CASTNET Rural dry deposition network with regional distribution of 84 sites –Rural82 –Suburban2 –Urban0
13
Speciation Trends Network Established to characterize the annual and seasonal spatial patterns of aerosols and track the progress of control programs –Rural7 –Suburban34 –Urban30
14
NAMS The NAMS (1,092 stations) are a subset of the NAMS network with emphasis being given to urban and multi- source areas. In effect, they are key sites under SLAMS, with emphasis on areas of maximum concentrations and high population density. –Rural158 –Suburban468 –Urban459 –Unknown7
15
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Actual NADP 1999-2001
16
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as NADP
17
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as NADP
18
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as CASTNET
19
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as CASTNET
20
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as STN
21
Wet NH 4 + REMSAD 2000Re-Sampled as STN
22
Histograms of Differences Between REMSAD and Re-Sampled Wet NH 4 + Re-Sampled as STN NADP STN CASTNET NAMS
23
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as NADP
24
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as NADP
25
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as CASTNET
26
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as CASTNET
27
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as STN
28
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as STN
29
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as NAMS
30
REMSAD 2000 Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) Re-Sampled as NAMS
31
Histograms of Differences Between REMSAD and Re-Sampled Dry (NH 3 +NH 4 +) NADP STN CASTNET NAMS
32
Summary Traditional monitoring networks do have a role, but… –are likely to miss areas of highest concentrations –may have a substantial bias in interpolations Rural monitoring appear to have less bias than urban networks
33
Future Plans at EPA’s Office of Atmospheric Protection Establish pilot high temporal-resolution sites –Denuders –Passive ammonia sampling –Gas Particle Ion Chromatograph? Geostatistical inferential modeling Use CMAQ to define spatial structure of pollutant concentrations
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.