1. AGRAS - TONK 1 No.of CIGs Formed23388.25% of SPMU target whereas we have submitted 233 CIGs to DPMU Majority Caste 1.Meena 2.Gurjar 3.Bairwa 1.Dhakar 2.Kumhar 3.Mali 4.Brahman 5.Others %of groups where majority belong to a particular caste/ sub caste 1.Meena35% 2.Bairwa 15% (SC&ST 50%) 3.Gurjar30% 1.Dhakar 15% 2.Kumhar 3% 3.Mali 2% 4.Brahman 2% 5.Others15%

2. AGRAS - TONK No. benefited (Financed)10444.63 of 233 CIGs Activity wise No. of CIGs benefited A]Agriculture & Allied7370.19% a) Land based3230.76% b) Dairy00% c) Livestock (Sheep & Goat)4139.42%

3. AGRAS-TONK B] Non Farm [Activity wise No.] 3117.51% a)Tent e) Readymade Garments g) Light Decoration h) Other 07 12 1 12 6.73% 11.53% 0.96% 10.42%

4. AGRAS-TONK 2Preparation, Sanction, implementation of sub projects (a) Avg. time taken for preparation 6 months (b) Avg. time for sanction of projects 3 months (c) Avg. time taken for Group contribution 3 months (d) Avg. time taken for transfer of funds to CIG account 1)1 month in non Farm sector 2) IInd & IIIrd installment delayed due to procedure. (e) Avg. time taken for acquisition of asset. 1) 3 months in Non farm. 2) 7 months to 12 months year in land based activities in which installment is 40-40-20% 3) Sheep Goat Buffalo: 1 to 8 months 2 installments and animal fair permission

5. AGRAS-TONK [A]% of groups earning a net income 104100% i) Rs.15000 per month00 ii) Rs.10000-150001514.42%Tent, Band &Tubewell iii) Rs.5000-100003533.65%Sheep, Gotry, IAD iv) Rs.50005451.92%-do- v) No Income00 [B] % of Groups who have acquired additional assets 4038.46% [C]% of groups linked to the market4543.26%

6. AGRAS-TONK 4% of group members who lost their assets 1605.72% of total 2796 group members Remark: In 233 CIGs total members 2796 and 160 members have lost assets (a) Through sale00 (b) Death1006.17% (c) Other reasons603.70% 5Capacity Building of CIGs % CIGs given (a) Orientation Training10444.63 %2 days (b) Skill building training4519.31%1) 7 days, 2) 30 days, 3) 45 days, 4) 60 days 5) 90 days

7. AGRAS-TONK 6% of groups linked to bank credit 0 7Insurance i) No.of CIGs who insured their assets 52 ii) No.of claims filed17 iii) No.of claims disbursed10 iv) Pending07

8. AGRAS-TONK 8 List of 10 Groups whom you consider a success story and mention reasons for success 1BhawaniChatrpuraTubewell 2Jai JawanHukumpuraTubewell 3DevnarayanBilaspurSheep 4Indira GandhiArnia KedarGoat 5PriyankaMohmmadGar h Tent House 6Veer TejajiPalaiR. G 7ShivGangaRanipuraIAD 8RamdevGothraIAD 9RamapeerGothraIAD 10Shri KirshnaBosariaBand

9. AGRAS-TONK 9 Lessons Learnt TaskTargetAchievem ent Rema ining Lessons LearntWhat Next CIG Formation26423331Problems from local SHs./Influence person Illiterate (Women) Target group Initially unaware about DPIP. Before CIG strengthen- ing, Awareness for 6 months Submission of CIGs 26423331-- Approval of CIGs26423331Delay (Slow process)Time bound: 15 days Timely Delivery Submission of Projects 26417589More Paper work More expectations from CIGs Paper work as per capacity of CIG members Sanctioned Projects 264151113Long procedure of Panel Earlier low conversance with line dept. Fee charges Rs.500 by panel Project approval from RUDA, DIC, MNIT delayed Formation of Project Sanction Committee

10. AGRAS-TONK 9 Lessons Learnt TaskTargetAchievem ent RemainingLessons LearntWhat Next Contribution and MOU Submission 15111041Drought for 3 Years hence problem face by our organization for contribution Notary Fees At initial stage SHG pattern may be adopted for 1 year after that Grading. This will ease contribution collection. Fund Release11010406objections after project sanction Delayed fund release Immediate Fund release, after project sanction. Delay de-motivates CIGs Submission UC10476-Difficult to gather the documents from CIGs. Local stakeholders misguided. Very less Gram Sabha Documents as per capacity of CIGs NGO-GO control over fund release is must. It will be easy to follow the rules & regulations Submission CC7647(29) Under Process

11. AGRAS - TONK 9 Lessons Learnt TaskTargetAchieve ment Remaini ng Lessons LearntWhat Next CC adjust by DPMU 1044729After March ’05 Physical Verification became must for pending projects. Many CCs pending only because of this change There should be common policy based on ground reality for CC adjustment. Sustainability after 3 month 230 Lengthy process of CC, NGOs could not complete task, which resulted in delayed reimbursement. This created economic crisis & mental tension among NGO worker. CC adjustment within 15 days after receiving required documents. DPMU should fix accountability. Cluster--We are going to submitted Garment stitching We have planned clusters for Buffalo It will be submitted very soon.

12. AGRAS - TONK Thanks