Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MAHAYANA BUDDHISM CRRS 313 20 SEPTEMBER 2012 DR. KIEKO OBUSE.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MAHAYANA BUDDHISM CRRS 313 20 SEPTEMBER 2012 DR. KIEKO OBUSE."— Presentation transcript:

1 MAHAYANA BUDDHISM CRRS 313 20 SEPTEMBER 2012 DR. KIEKO OBUSE

2 KAMAKURA BUDDHISM (REVIEW) What is Kamakura Buddhism? ‘Kamakura Buddhism’ as a category – what does it mean? What are the main schools of Kamakura Buddhism? Zen (two schools) Nichiren Pure Land (two schools) (They are among the most widely represented Buddhist schools in contemporary Japan) Why are they called Kamakura Buddhism? (Kamakura period 1192-1333  Heian period 794-1185) Perhaps we can find some clue in their teachings…

3 JODO SHU (THE PURE LAND SCHOOL) Hōnen (1133-1212): Tendai monk Regarded achieving enlightenment as impossible, aiming at a rebirth in the Pure Land instead What is the (Western) Pure Land? Buddha Amida (Amitabha) Senchaku Hongan Nenbutsu Shū (Choosing the Original Vow for the Recitation of the Buddha’s Name, 1198) Advocated exclusive nenbutsu practice, rejecting all other practices Nenbutsu (chanting the name of the Buddha): namu amida butsu

4 JODO-SHIN SHU (THE TRUE PURE LAND SCHOOL, AKA. SHIN BUDDHISM) Shinran (1173-1262): disciple of Hōnen, also trained at Mt. Hiei Advocated exclusive practice of nenbutsu But: He married and ate meat (  revelation from the prince Shotoku) (not priest, nor layperson) Salvation is not attained through human effort (jiriki, self-power) but through the Other-Power (tariki), i.e. salvific power of Amida Only faith (shinjin) in Amida is necessary. Nenbutsu is an expression of gratitude for the salvation already granted by Amida. “Even a good person can attain birth in the Pure Land, so it goes without that an evil person will.”

5 ZEN 1: RINZAI SHU (THE RINZAI SCHOOL) Eisai (1141-1215): trained at Mt. Hiei attempted to revive Tendai combined Zen and esoteric practices Welcomed by the samurai (warrior class) Focus on zazen (seated meditation) and kōan training Kōan: stories of Zen masters (mondō) or short questions with no logical answer designed to create a breakthrough of insight used in mater-disciple exchanges. E.g. ‘What is the sound of one-hand clapping?’ Kōan was systematized by Hakuin (1686-1768)

6 ZEN 2: SOTO SHU (THE SOTO SCHOOL) Dōgen (1200-1253): initially studied under Eisai’s disciple Focus on zazen: shikan taza (just sitting)’ as the genuine teaching of Śākyamuni Shōbō Genzō (the Treasury of the True Dharma Eye) To learn the Buddha way is to learn the individual self. To learn the individual self is to forget the individual self. To forget the individual self is to be realized by all beings. To be realized by all things is both the individual self’s body-mind and the other selves’ body-mind casting off.’ ‘Body and mind casting off’: shinjin datsuraku Later popularized among ordinary people (e.g. farmers) through non-zazen practices

7 NICHIREN SHU (THE NICHIREN SCHOOL) Nichiren (1222-1282): Tendai monk Dedicated to the mission to propagate the teaching of the Lotus Sutra and to save his country Risshō Ankoku Ron (Rectification for the Peace of the Nation, 1260): If the people do not heed the message of the Lotus Sutra, the country will be inflicted by civil wars and foreign invasions. Advocated exclusive practice of daimoku chanting Daimoku: namu myoho renge kyo Attacked other schools (shakubuku)  exile (1271-4)

8 SO, ONCE AGAIN… Why are they called Kamakura Buddhism as a whole? Are there any commonalities among them?  Discussion 1 (in groups; ideas on paper) Commonalities Focus on one particular practice Easy to practice New Popular (esp. among ordinary people) These are often considered as the major characteristics of ‘Kamakura Buddhism’

9 KAMAKURA ‘NEW’ BUDDHISM? Kamakura Buddhism is also sometimes called Kamakura ‘New’ Buddhism. This means that these characteristics are new, and not found among the schools of Buddhism that arose before them So do we have two types of Buddhism? Old Buddhism and Kamakura New Buddhism? Was there such a radical break between the two? Was there not continuity between the two types of Buddhism? Opinions are divided among scholars.

10 ARGUMENTS AGAINST USING THE CATEGORY ‘KAMAKURA NEW BUDDHISM’ The founders of these schools were all educated at Mount Hiei, the headquarters of the Tendai school. Their teachings are based on the concepts and practices that had developed during the previous period (i.e. the Heian period) For example: The devotion to Amida Buddha The concept of original enlightenment (or the Buddha nature): Mountains, rivers, plants and flowers all achieve enlightenment The focus on the Lotus Sutra The concept of ekayana (one vehicle), emphasized in the Lotus Sutra

11 ARGUMENTS AGAINST USING THE CATEGORY ‘KAMAKURA NEW BUDDHISM’ (CONT.) Some of the schools actually had a ‘mixed’ practice, rather than focusing on one practice. For example, Zen schools promoted the practice of meditation alongside performing protective rituals (Rinzai), and the ceremony of precept-giving to attract followers (Soto). -- Why is this? Buddhism had the role of protecting the nation.  esoteric rituals Also, meditation is too difficult for ordinary people… These schools were not that popular but rather marginal. The ‘traditional’ schools were still dominant during the Kamakura period. The religious landscape did not change that drastically. -- Their present popularity does not mean that they were widely accepted by people from the very beginning!

12 WHY NEW APPROACHES? Ok, let’s continue the discussion with the assumption that it is reasonable to talk about these schools as representing ‘Kamakura Buddhism.’ If their approaches are radically different from those of the older schools, why is that? What are the factors that contributed to their emergence? – social, political, economic, religious… In other words: Why did the founders of these schools employ such new approaches? Why did they think the change was necessary?  Discussion 2

13 FACTORS BEHIND THE EMERGENCE OF KAMAKURA ‘NEW’ BUDDHISM Some possible factors that contributed to the emergence of ‘Kamakura Buddhism’ Socio-political: Social unrest (rise of the warrior class in late Heian period) Natural disasters External threat (Mongol invasions, 1274, 1281)  Wish for liberation (or rebirth in the Pure Land) increased Decline in observance of monastic rules among monks

14 FACTORS BEHIND THE EMERGENCE OF KAMAKURA ‘NEW’ BUDDHISM (CONT.) Doctrinal: These observations and sentiments found support in the concept of mappo (1052-) Mappo: the Age of Final Dharma - the Dharma is in serious decline -It is impossible to attain enlightenment through the ‘traditional’ practice. The Tendai concept of original enlightenment (hongaku) The notion of ekayana (emphasized in the Lotus Sutra)  New approaches

15 SO, WHAT DO YOU THINK? Please share your thoughts on today’s discussion, and on the lecture as a whole. Thank you! (feedback sheet)


Download ppt "MAHAYANA BUDDHISM CRRS 313 20 SEPTEMBER 2012 DR. KIEKO OBUSE."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google