Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnthony Kelley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Montana Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Project Al McMilin, Gail Surwill, Lisa Scott and Jodi Rookhuizen Presentation for CCSSO Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Webinar April 22, 2009
2
Al McMilin, Education Quality Program Specialist, Montana Office of Public Instruction
3
Agenda MSEC State Overview MSEC District Perspective MSEC School and Classroom Perspective MSEC Next Steps Questions
4
Montana – Big Sky Country!
5
Montana Montana Standards Standards (Intended) (Intended) Montana Montana Standards Standards (Intended) (Intended) Curriculum(Intended)Curriculum(Intended) Assessment Assessment(Assessed)(Learned) (Assessed)(Learned) ProfessionalDevelopmentProfessionalDevelopment Instruction Instruction(Enacted) (Enacted) 5YCEP CEI Process Montana Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum (MSEC) – Alignment Assessment Process The Five -Year Comprehensive Education Plan (5YCEP) Building a Continuous Education Improvement (CEI) Process for Montana Schools The Vision
6
Standards-Based Instruction - Alignment - Dialogue Interpretation of Data Current Practice/Curriculum Perspective Planning MSEC Data Assessment Data CRT Results I-Analyze Results Released Item Review Other District Data Insuring Effective Decisions! Individual Maps School/District/State Maps
7
Options for Action Plans Vertical/Horizontal Articulations Curriculum Modifications Pacing Guides Materials Development Professional Development Monitor Progress/Adjust
8
Phase I – Pilot Projects – 2005-2006 … making (M)SEC work for us! Poplar Billings Montana Small Schools Alliance Havre Libby Chester-Joplin- Inverness Prairie View Curriculum Consortium Wolf Point Title II Math/Science Partnership Grants St. Regis Huntley Project Troy Bozeman
9
Phase II – Developing the Model 2006 – 2009 Working with districts through a multi- year cycle Taking on a limited number of new districts Continue to build trainer corps
10
Phase III – Reconnecting Statewide 2009 Continue to support current projects Promote use of MSEC through a variety of venues across the state Title I will begin using it as an initial strategy when working with schools in need of improvement or in restructuring under NCLB
11
Gail Surwill-K-12 Director of Curriculum and Instruction for Billings Public Schools Lisa Scott-9-12 Curriculum and K-12 Assessment for Billings Public Schools
12
Billings Public Schools District use of SEC District Demographics District Goal Tool used to connect Curriculum, Instruction, Professional Development and Assessment Assessme nt PD Instructio n Curriculu m
13
First Steps… Examined current reality –State Standards, Enacted Curriculum, and State CRT Assessment Asked hard questions Challenging conversations
14
SEC Map Activity Take a few minutes to examine and discuss the contour maps Discuss the alignment of the four maps. Do you see any noticeable patterns? Describe the similarities and differences between the maps? What conclusions can you make? What content topics and/or cognitive levels would you suggest improving?
15
15 2005 Comparison – Standards, Instruction, and CRT
16
Identified Curriculum Points 7 th & 8 th Coarse Grain Maps the Same –Needed to examine Fine Grain Maps Shift Emphasis Build Trust District Learning Objectives Resources –Primary and supplemental Technology
17
Professional Development Decisions Primary Resource & Technology Training Summer Courses Math Professional Learning Communities District Math Meetings Math Coach
18
18 2005-2008 Comparison–Measurement–Gr 8 Instruction Maps
19
19 2005-2008 Comparison–Geo Concepts–Gr 8 Instruction Maps
20
20 Billings District Curriculum Maps – 7 th and 8 th Grades
21
Comparison – Gr 8 Curriculum, Instruction, and CRT The percentages come from the Gr 8 district avg points earned out of the points possible for each state standards content topic on the MT CRT. 40% 50% 33% 63% 50% 63% 50%67% 50% 58% 44% 63%
22
22 8 th Grade Comparison – Cognitive Demand 2005 - 2008
23
Jodi Rookhuizen, 7 th Grade Mathematics Teacher at Castle Rock Middle School
24
What does this all mean for me - the teacher? A Lot of Data! Our Struggle Self Reflection Change is a Process Where to Begin?
25
Anatomy of Change the 1 st Year In our District In our school In my classroom
26
Anatomy of Change: A Continued Process In our District –Revisit Pacing Guide –Writing Companion –Supplementary Lessons –Manipulatives –Professional Learning Community –Summer Professional Development
27
Anatomy of Change: A Continued Process In our school –Professional Development –Revisited Goals –Instructional Strategies Across Disciplines –Math Labs –Instructional Strategies Team –Department Collaboration
28
Anatomy of Change: A Continued Process In my classroom –Lesson Reflection –Writing in Math –Cooperative Learning –Alternative Assessments –Instructional Strategies –Interdisciplinary Lessons
29
Lisa Scott, 9-12 Curriculum and K-12 Assessment for Billings Public Schools
30
Next Steps… Teacher Maps Common Formative Assessments Use Data Time Continue the process with High School Math
31
.....Who knows what else is to come….. “One thing is sure. We have to do something. We have to do the best we know how at the moment … if it doesn’t turn out right, we can modify it as we go along.” ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
32
Questions?
33
Thank You!! Al McMilin, Montana Office of Public Instruction –amcmilin@mt.gov Gail Surwill, Billings Public Schools –surwillg@billings.k12.mt.us Lisa Scott, Billings Public Schools –scottl@billings.k12.mt.us Jodi Rookhuizen, Castle Rock Middle School –rookhuizenj@billings.k12.mt.us
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.