1. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

2. Enrollment has increased; state appropriations have decreased. System Funding and FTE Enrollment History 119,115 121,111 128,530 134,874 140,250 est. $829.1 $767.8 $791.5 $816.2 $772.2 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 145,000 FY00FY01FY02FY03FY04 $767.0 $777.0 $787.0 $797.0 $807.0 $817.0 $827.0 $837.0 $847.0 $857.0 FTE EnrollmentAppropriations

3. Change in Resident Undergraduate Tuition (public four- year) and State Higher Education Appropriations, 1990-91 to 2003-04 -6% -3% 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04

4. Financial Outlook 2004 Tuition on the Rise Tuition on the Rise Over the past decade, average tuition and fees, adjusted for inflation, increased $1,506 (or 47 percent) at public four-year colleges and $5,866 (or 42 percent) at private four-year colleges.

5. State Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher Age 25 Years and Older, 2002 Dist of Columbia 1 Maryland 2 Colorado 3 Virginia 4 Massachusetts 5 Connecticut 6 New Jersey 7 Vermont 8 Minnesota 9 New Hampshire 10 Rhode Island 11 Delaware 12 Kansas 13 New York 14 Washington 15 California 16 Illinois 17 Nebraska 18 Oregon 19 Utah 20 Hawaii 21 Missouri 22 Arizona 23 Texas 24 Pennsylvania 25 Florida 26 Alaska 27 New Mexico 28 North Dakota 29 Georgia 30 Wisconsin 31 Ohio 32 Maine 33 Indiana 34 Montana 35 South Dakota 36 South Carolina 37 Iowa 38 Alabama 39 Michigan 40 North Carolina 41 Nevada 42 Louisiana 43 Kentucky 44 Tennessee 45 Idaho 46 Mississippi 47 Oklahoma 48 Wyoming 49 Arkansas 50 West Virginia 51 44.4 37.6 35.7 34.6 34.3 32.6 31.4 30.8 30.5 30.1 29.5 29.1 28.8 28.3 27.9 27.3 27.1 28.8 26.8 26.4 26.3 26.2 26.1 25.7 25.6 25.4 25.3 25 24.7 24.5 23.8 23.7 23.6 23.3 23.1 22.7 22.5 22.4 22.1 21.6 21.5 20.9 20.4 19.6 18.5 15.9 Oklahoma 48 20.4

6. Enrollment Growth at For-Profit Colleges Enrollment Growth at For-Profit Colleges Although the biggest for-profit colleges enroll less than 3 percent of all postsecondary students, their enrollment is growing much faster than that of higher education as a whole.

7. Population with Bachelor’s Degree or higher Per Capita Income OK State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of Adult Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

8. Population with Bachelor’s Degree or higher Per Capita Income DC CT NJ MA MD VA CO CA WA IL IN ME SC MI NV AZ TX IA WV AR MS ID OK LA KY AL MT NM UT ND SD TN WY NC KS OR NE MO OH WI GA FL PA HI VT RI NH DE MN NY AK $16,000 $18,000 $20,000 $22,000 $24,000 $26,000 $28,000 $30,000 15%20%25%30%35%40%45% State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of Adult Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

9. 14.3% 15.1% 34.8% 37.5% 52.0% 57.7% 60.7% 69.2% 0 - $34,999 $35,000 – $64,999 $65,000 - $99,999$100,000 and above Percent of Population with Bachelor’s Degree by Age and Individual Income Quartile for the State of Oklahoma and U.S. Percent of Population with a Bachelor’s Degree Income Quartile Oklahoma 25 years of age and over U.S. 25 years of age and over

10. Number of Public Higher Education Institutions Compared to Total Population (Actual vs. Predicted)

11. Projected Change in Employment by Education and Training, 1998-2008 Education andPercent Training CategoryIncrease Doctoral Degree23 Master’s Degree19 Bachelor’s Degree24 Associate Degree31 Vocational Training14 Work Experience12 On-Job Training7 All Occupations14 Source: Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor

12. Empowered, Informed, Self-Directed Life Long Learners Stable or Less State Funding Lecture = Most Economical Approach More Students Bigger Classes Reduced Student Learning Experience Employers (Business Leaders) Less Satisfied With Graduates Legislators Less Sure of Quality and Value Alternative Approaches, Remedies Course Redesign Shared Resources

13. Skills and Attributes of a Nation of Learners Leadership Leadership Teamwork Teamwork Problem Solving Problem Solving Time Management Time Management Self-management Self-management Adaptability Adaptability Analytical Thinking Analytical Thinking Global Consciousness Global Consciousness Basic Communications Basic Communications The Business-Higher Education Forum, Spanning the Chasm: Corporate and Academic Cooperation To Improve Workforce Preparation, 1997.

14. Course Redesign Project Carol Twig, RPI Active Student Learning Learning Assistance Technologies http://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2less.html http://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2award.html

15. Today’s World Continuing conditions of tight budget. Continuing conditions of tight budget. College degrees important to self, state and beyond. College degrees important to self, state and beyond. Think differently about teaching and learning. Think differently about teaching and learning.

16. Teaching for Tomorrow Teach collaboratively Teach collaboratively Advisory boards for every department Advisory boards for every department Content important, but new focus on learning Content important, but new focus on learning Students expect technology Students expect technology Strategic investment for teaching Strategic investment for teaching

17. Technology Intensity of Business Base TECHNOLOGY INTENSITY OF BUSINESS BASERANK %Established in high-tech businesses 32 %Employed in high-tech35 % Percent payroll in high-tech36 % Established births in high-tech35 2003 U.S. Department of Commerce report “The Dynamics of Technology- Based Economic Development.”

18. Funding In-Flows FUNDING IN-FLOWSRANK R&D expenditures/$1000 of GSP43 Industry R&D/$1000 of GSP40 Federal R&D/$1000 of GSP28 University R&D/$1000 of GSP31 SBIR awards/$1000 of GSP41 STTR awards/$1000 of GSP19 2003 U.S. Department of Commerce report “The Dynamics of Technology- Based Economic Development.”

19. Industrial R&D Per Capita 1997 1998 2000 1999 Year 400 300 200 100 0 500 600 700 800 $ Per Capita Source: OCAST US AR OK MO TX KS

20. Federally Funded University R&D 40 30 20 10 0 50 60 70 80 $ Per Capita Source: OCAST 1996 20001999 Year 1994 1995 19971998 2001 AR OK MO KS TXUS

21. State R&D Profile Oklahoma’s Fed R&D funding capture rate $55 per capita National Fed R&D funding capture rate $269 per capita Leave $738,000,000 in federally- sponsored R&D funding on the table each year

22. INSTRUCTIONAL SPENDING PER FTE, BY STATE Percent Change and Current Position Relative to U.S. Average -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% -50%-40%-30%-20%-10%0%10%20%30%40%50% Percent Over/Under the U.S. Average, FY02 Percent Change, FY91 - FY02 high and increasing low and increasing low and decreasing high and decreasing AK MS WV MD KY IL NJ NYTX AL SD TN CO NE FL OK LA MT NM NC HI RI,  MA WA SC ND AR VA ID KSMO GA NH MN OH WI IA ME MI PA VT U.S. WY UT CA IN OR NVAZ DE  Source: State Higher Education Finance (SHEF) Survey 1990-91 through 2001-02 - SHEEO

23. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education