1. Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group
LVC KORCOM M&S Futures: A Pathway to a Unified Architecture
Worldwide Joint Training
and Scheduling Conference
LTC John T. Janiszewski
Chief, Technical Development and Innovation Branch
J7, Joint Warfighting Center
U.S. Joint Forces Command

2. Purpose
To provide an information briefing on the work to date in support of KORCOM training requirements and outline how it can drive the Joint Training Enterprise towards the recommendations provided in the Live Virtual And Constructive Architecture Roadmap (JLVCAR) and Flagship Studies

3. Outline Background USKORCOM M&S Futures Workshop Problem Statement
Unified Architecture
Benefits of a Unified Architecture
Milestones
Issues Requiring Further Analysis
Opportunity Costs
Summary and Way Ahead

4. Background SECDEF published USFK Transformation Guidance on 4 Jul 07
In FY08 JFCOM and Team Orlando fund Flagship Study to determine if JFCOM can leverage Service simulations and tools to reduce costs
Flagship Study team recommends a Unified Architecture
LVCAR study published in September 2008
JFCOM holds USKORCOM M&S Futures Workshop in May 09

5. USKORCOM M&S Futures Workshop
Senior members and technicians from the following organizations attended a two day collaborative workshop at JWFC and reached consensus on the recommended Course of Action.
Joint Warfighting Center
Korea Battle Simulation Center
Korea Air Simulation Center
National Simulation Center
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Air Force Agency for Modeling and Simulation
Department of the Army Management Office - Training Simulations
Program Executive Office - Simulations Training Integration
US Pacific Command
US Forces Korea
US Army Forces Pacific
Pacific Air Forces
Fleet Forces Command

6. Workshop Objectives
Clearly define the issues of this complex training environment problem as they pertain to the unique and quickly evolving USFK training requirements
Produce a coordinated roadmap of COCOM and Service responsibilities that will support near term training needs and USKORCOM's training plan supporting OPCON Transfer to the ROK JCS and beyond.

7. Problem Statement
To meet KORCOM training requirements there is a requirement for a jointly accredited suite of constructive models
Capable of modeling entire Korean theater
Meets all theater and service training requirements, operational to tactical
Capable of fully interoperating with ROK simulations
UNC-CFC-USFK M&S Requirements Doc, v9
FOC: FY13

8. Unified Architecture
Integrate Army’s Multi-Resolution Federation – WARSIM (MRF-W) and Korean federation (KSIMS) with JLVC (Unified Architecture)
Sustain Army’s Corps Battle Simulation (CBS) based MRF (MRF-C) and maintain KBSC’s RESA until 2013
Summary
Continue model interoperability between US/Korean ground models
USAF models integrates through JLVC (completed)
Continue model interoperability between US/Korean air models
USN model integrates through JLVC (completed)
Marine Corps model integrates through JLVC
Brigade and below specific tool requires a separate architecture
Develop a bridge to Korean models
Benefits
Leverages Joint M&S efforts
USN/USAF integration complete
Programmatic simplicity
Detriment
Korean Model integration takes a step backward

9. Unified Architecture Coalition Bridge MRF Bridge JLVC (No Time Mgt)
Air
AWSIM
Ground
JCATS
JLOD
Naval
JSAF
Amphibious
MTWS
Intel
VSTARS
MUSE
ACRES
Logistics
JDLM
DESS
KSIMS (Time Mgt)
Naval
Cheong Hae
Ground
Chang Jo 21
Logistics
CSSM
AAR
STAAR
Amphibious
Chon Ja Bong
Air
Chang Gong
MRF-W (Time Mgt)
AAR
AARS
ARCHER
Special
JNEM
Special
MDST
JECS
JTDS
Amphibious
JCATS
Logistics
JDLM
Benefits
- Meets Requirements
- Builds upon the Joint M&S Standard
- Updates federation w/ service supported simulations
- Most cost effective COA
Ground
WARSIM
Intel
WIM
Bridge

10. Benefits of a Unified Architecture
Maximizes existing Joint LVC training standards, LVC investments, and Service training capabilities / roadmaps
Eliminates redudant efforts by services
Provides initial effort to link coalition training architectures
Promotes the JTE vision and goals as described in the draft DoDI 1322.xx and 1322.yy
Implements selected pieces of recommendations identified in the LVC AR report, the Flagship Study, and the JCOM project

11. Proposed Milestones USAF Design and Development
USN Design and Development
USA Design and Development

12. Issues Requiring Further Analysis
Actual Status of WARSIM/MRF-W Development
Timelines make an assumption that WARSIM will be operational ready for integration
WARSIM Database build requirements
Korean Model Integration Requirements
Requires Initial Design Meeting to Scope Integration Effort
KBSC Communication Infrastructure
Need to evaluate current communications infrastructure
Upgrades might be needed to support JLVC
Cross Domain requirements to integrate Korean models

13. Status and Way Ahead Conducting analysis on alternatives
Working with USFK, OSD and Joint Staff to allocate necessary funding
Analyzing existing programs
Submitted PR11 budget request
Proposed way ahead:
Sustain existing federation (JTTI+K) thru FY12
Identify funding for sustainment and development
Design, Develop, and implement “Unified Architecture”

14. UNCLASSIFIED
QUESTIONS?
UNCLASSIFIED 14

15. SECDEF Guidance