Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews

2 Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews

3 Prejudice  An opinion, often unfavourable, formed without a fair examination of the facts: especially antagonism towards members of other races, religion etc

4 Discrimination ( in human resources )  The systematic exclusions of particular persons from consideration of a job, or payment of different wages to such persons because of age, sex or race or some other characteristics not relevant to job ability or performance

5 Types, sources, objectives and jurisdiction of Canadian Human Rights Legislation – Federal Law  Sources passed in parliament and enforced by the federal Human Rights Commission  Objective & Jurisdiction To ensure equal employment opportunities with employers under federal jurisdiction (10% of the Canadian workforce)

6 Types, sources, objectives and jurisdiction of Canadian Human Rights Legislation – Provincial Law  Sources enacted by provincial parliament and enforced by the provincial Human Rights Commissions  Objective & Jurisdiction To ensure equal employment opportunities with employers under provincial jurisdiction (90% of the Canadian workforce)

7 Employer Retaliation  When an supervisor tries to “get even” when an employee files charges or a complaint under the Human Rights Act

8 Equal Pay for Equal Work  People performing the same kind of work should receive the same pay regardless of gender, race, or other characteristics not related to ability or performance

9 Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value  Men and women with comparable jobs (similar in content, skill, effort, responsibilities, working conditions) should receive equal compensation

10 Systemic Discrimination  There is no intention to discriminate, but the system, arrangements, or policies allow indirect discrimination to happen

11 Failure to provide Reasonable Accommodation  If an employer fails to accommodate an employee in a protected area (ex religious practices) to the point of undue hardship

12 Harassment  When one member of an organization subjects another employee to one or more incidents that “ a reasonable person ought to have known would be unwelcome” and pertain to a protective classification in the Human Rights Legislation

13 Reverse Discrimination  This occurs when an employer seeks to hire or promote a member of a protected class over an equally ( or better) qualified candidate not in a protected class

14 Bona Fide Occupational Requirements  A justified reason for discriminating against a member of a protected class

15 Human Rights Legislation affects:  Training decisions about who to training must follow established criteria – failure to train certain groups may be considered discrimination  Recruiting- where is recruiting taking place?  Selection – company must select/reject based on the basis of experience and ability

16 Cont’d  Compensation – pay according to skill, individual performance and/or seniority  Performance Appraisal – must be free of biases that discriminate

17 Other Legal Challenges  Canada Labour Code – regulates union certification, right to organize, union prosecution, mediation and arbitration procedures  Dismissal – an immediate dismissal is possible if an employee is compensated through appropriate severance pay

18 Cont’d  Minimum wages – set by provincial and federal boards  Occupational Health and Safety – Labour Standards Codes also regulate these issues  Workplace Hazardous Material Information Systems (WHMIS) – regulates the handling of hazardous materials


Download ppt "Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google