Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Earthquake Engineering

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Earthquake Engineering"— Presentation transcript:

1 Earthquake Engineering

2 “8.9 Quake Strikes Japan—Nation’s worst in 140 years”
Airport, Sendai, Japan Fukushima-Daichi nuclear power plant

3 Earthquakes Past and Present
Sendai, Japan (8.9 magnitude) historical Seismicity Map

4 A pan-global issue….

5 Some Major Earthquakes, Past and Present
Christchurch, NZ 2011 Talca, Chile 2010 Port-au-Prince, Haiti, 2010 Guandong, China, 2008 Fukuoka, Japan, 2005 Izmit, Turkey, 1999 Northridge, CA, 1994 Mexico City, 1985

6 Why bother?

7 Sendai Japan Earthquake 2011
Amazing engineering: Buildings Sway Without Collapsing

8 Different Buildings Different model parameters

9 The Fundamental Questions
Can we predict how different buildings will respond to an earthquake? How can we use this information to engineer a safe structure

10 Tabas, Iran 1978 Earthquake Acceleration record is messy. No way to integrate Duhamel’s integral. No worries, computers to the rescue! Relative motion of building and ground Impulse Response Function Measured Acceleration/USGS data

11 z = 0.05 is assumed marks |z|max
Ground acceleration (units of g) z = 0.05 is assumed Z(t) meters marks |z|max Z(t) meters If we found |z|max for a continuous range of wo, we’d get the Spectral Displacement (Displacement Spectrum) Z(t) meters

12 Spectra For El Centro Ground Motion
Averaged Spectra To Many (88) Earthquakes Spectra For El Centro Ground Motion Velocity Acceleration Displacement Natural Period (sec) Figure Credits: L A Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, Chap 6 Right: G. Housner “Strong Ground Motion” in Earthquake Engineering, R Wiegel, editor.

13 Tripartite Representation
SD = spectral displacement SV = spectral velocity SA = spectral acceleration SA /wo = SV = woSD

14 Housner Spectrum Spectrum for one earthquake
Spectrum averaged over 88 earthquakes

15 Housner spectrum for z = 0.05

16 Seattle Monorail Seattle, WA is a beautiful city, but is prone to large earthquakes. The monorail on the bridge has previously been measured to have a natural period of 2 s. Damping is assumed to be 2%. During an earthquake, is the trolley likely to derail? Use the Housner spectrum to find out! Picture from:

17 Beach House You are hired as an architectural engineer to build a California dream house on a hillside. The structure can be idealized as shown (on chalkboard). The frame is built out of concrete (E = 30x109 Pa). The support columns have a cross section of 10 inches squared. Assume damping is 5%. Determine the base shear in each column, which is more likely to fail?

18 What we need to guard against
Buckling SmaSHING/POUNDING

19 Base Isolation Configuration
Figure credit: Michael D. Symans, PhD Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute:

20 Reduced Shearing in Superstructure.
Conventional Building Base-Isolated Building Figure credit: Michael D. Symans, PhD Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute:

21 Lead-Rubber Bearing Shear Modulus E ~ 0.5 – 1.0 MPa
Figure credit:s Michael D. Symans, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute:

22 LRB decreases keff and wo
Reduces shearing in columns…………but increases displacement

23 LRB Isolation in Action
Rubber Base Isolators

24 Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) in Action
UCSD testing facility LBRs in Japan

25 How do we model what we just saw?
Displacement , u

26 Frictional Pendulum System
Image credit:

27 Concept of Frictional Pendulum
Image credits: laconservancy.org

28 Frictional Pendulum Pendulum Period: T=2𝜋 𝑅/𝑔
Restoring/Recentering Force Frictional Force Pendulum Period: T=2𝜋 𝑅/𝑔

29 The quantitative model
Restoring/Recentering Force Frictional Force

30 Force vs. Displacement Hysteresis Loop


Download ppt "Earthquake Engineering"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google