1. Overview of Environmental Scan Findings

2. Environmental Scan – Year 1 Quantitative and qualitative research methods: Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, Participant Observations, Document Reviews Participants: Residents, Family members, Physicians, PSWs, RNs, RPNs, Spiritual Care, Social Work, Recreation, Dietary, Housekeeping, Maintenance, Administration, Volunteers and Community Partners

3. Participants and Data Collection Surveys All LTC home staff completed surveys – Sample sizes across 4 homes are approximately: 205 PSWs 69 Licensed Nurses 79 Support Staff 32 Administration 39 Residents 64 Family Members

4. Summary of Survey Results that All Staff Completed

5. FATCOD Survey(Frommelt Attitudes Toward the Care of Dying)  30-item scale designed to measure participants’ attitude toward providing care to dying people  Has no subscales  Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)  15 items are scored positively and 15 negatively (lower scores consistent with PC philosophy)

6. Findings of the FATCOD Survey  Average scores across: 4.075  All four homes: 4.075  PSWs: 3.82  Licensed nurses: 4.21  Support Services: 3.89  Management: 4.16  On average, staff demonstrated a positive attitude about providing care for dying residents

7. QiAS ( Quality in Action Scale)  43-item scale designed to measure aspects of work culture related to quality:  Six subscales:  improvement orientation  patient focus  personal influence/performance  management style  mission and goals orientation  team work orientation  participants’ attitude toward providing care to dying people  Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)

8. Findings of the QiAS Maple; n= 181 out of a possible 242 respondents Birch; n= 135 out of a possible 202 respondents Elm; n= 52 out of a possible 135 respondents Pine; n = 55 out of a possible 104 respondents

9. Summary of PSW Survey Results

10. Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace (PEiW) Survey  PEiW is a 12-item scale that measures direct care workers’ sense of personal empowerment within their workplace  Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)  Four dimensions are measured:  meaning  competency  self-determination  impact

11. Findings of the PEiW Survey Pine; n= 24 out of a possible 44 respondents Birch; n= 72 out of a possible 102 respondents Maple; n= 86 out of a possible 124 respondents Elm; n= 47 out of a possible 53 respondents

12. Supervisory Support Survey  SSS is a 15-item scale that assesses aspects of supervisory support  Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always)  Three dimensions are measured:  empathy  reliability  nurturing connections

13. Findings of Supervisory Support Survey Birch; n= 73 out of a possible 102 respondents Maple; n= 86 out of a possible 124 respondents Pine; n= 24 out of a possible 44 respondents Elm; n= 31 out of a possible 53 respondents

14. Summary of Nurses Survey Results

15. Self-Efficacy in End-of-Life Care (S-E EOLC)  This 25-item survey measures confidence in the ability to provide palliative care  Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (Cannot do at all) to 7 (Certain can do)  Includes 3 subscales:  patient management  communication  multidisciplinary teamwork

16. Findings of Self-Efficacy in End-of-Life Care Survey Maple; n= 27 out of a possible 43 respondents Birch; n= 22 out of a possible 42 respondents Elm; n= 11 out of a possible 16 respondents Pine; n= 8 out of a possible 18 respondents

17. Palliative Care Quiz (PCQ)  The PCQ is a 20-item scale that measures knowledge of palliative care nursing  It can be use to stimulate discussion of palliative care nursing and to identify misconceptions about the delivery of palliative care.

18. Findings of the Palliative Care Quiz  Overall, nurses scored an average of 60.22 % on the PCQ. Scores for the individual homes are listed below:  Higher scores were achieved on questions related to use of pain medications Birch average score = 63.4% Maple average score = 62.98% Elm average score = 62% Pine average score = 52.5% Birch; n= 22 out of a possible 42 respondents Maple; n= 27 out of a possible 43 respondents Elm; n= 12 out of a possible 16 respondents Pine; n= 8 out of a possible 18 respondents

19. Family and Resident Results

20. Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver Quality of Life in Life- Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver  What is the QOLLTI-F survey?  The Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver Version (QOLLTI-F) survey assesses the quality of life of caregivers for people with life-threatening chronic or terminal health conditions.  There are five dimensions to this survey; – environment, – patient state, – own state, – outlook, – quality of care, – relationships and – financial worries.

21. QOLLTI-F Maple; n= 15 respondents Birch; n= 23 respondents Elm; n= 22 respondents Pine; n= 14 respondents

22.  What is the MQoL survey?  The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL) was developed to measure five dimensions of quality of life which are: physical symptoms, physical well-being, psychological, existential and support.  What is quality of life?  Quality of life is defined as an individual’s subjective well-being. McGill Quality of life Survey

23. MQOL Maple; n= 5 residents Birch; n= 2 residents, 17 proxies Elm; n= 1 resident, 6 proxy Pine; n= 6 resident, 2 proxy

24. Group Discussion What surprised you most/least about the results of the environmental scan? What practices and strategies are you aware of that have been effective in providing palliative care in long-term care homes?

25. Acknowledgement Funding Provided By: Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada Thank you to our partners:

26. Contact Us Visit our website: www.palliativealliance.ca Email us: palliativealliance@lakeheadu.ca Call us: 807-766-7228 Thank You